Level of Dross/Reputations
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
and volunteer to help develop code to keep the bad guys at bay. I haven't seen anyone else step up like that
I'll put my mooney where my mouth is and I write code that will trap duff articless. The first thing that needs to be done is put a classification on the duff artices. 1. Empty Article 2. Partial Empty Article 3. Bad Formatting 4. Too short? 5. etc. Then develop code analysis and parse the articles. Ain't rocket science.
sounds like it would make a good article aswell :-)
-
I suppose I should have made myself clearer from the start. All "boilerplate" articles should be hunted down and removed before they even make it into the system. In other words, as soon as the "author" presses Submit, the system should check the article. The logic wouldn't be too hard - remove all HTML tags and all white space from the article (possibly even remove all vowels) - and then do a comparison to the template and reject the article if it isn't at least 95% different.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
No worries, Pete, the truely dross articles will get voted down anyway and having the filters set to 3 sweeps them out of the Radar (there I used that damn work again :). My only concerned to the filter code, is say somebody votes an article down and it actually is a good article how does it get picked up again if say you have your filters set the 3? Just a thought.
-
sounds like it would make a good article aswell :-)
:laugh: no there's an idea, a well documented interface so it could plug straight into the article submission code.
bool IsArticleOkForSubmission(string[] articleBody) { bool passed = false; // To Do... add implementation details here. return passed; } -
I think that a lot of Indians in particular, are looking for forms of certification, and are hoping to be able to say they have XX articles and/or hope to get the CP MVP award.
Most interviewers don't give a damn if the candidate has written articles in any website. And I've also seen that most do not give major weightage to certifications. Most know that a) Most folks here get certified ony for the reason to get certified and mostly use dumps b) I've seen cases where you can only start working on the project if have completed a X certification, and you have 1 week to write the exam c) Most guys work in a team, where there may be 1 or 2 knowledgeable individuals who drive the team. the rest of them ride on their shoulders and for the most part, don't know whats going on. It's unfortunate that this actually got translated to blaming a single country for the debacle. But the truth is, in most cases, bitter.
SG Cause is effect concealed. Effect is cause revealed.
SimulationofSai wrote:
It's unfortunate that this actually got translated to blaming a single country for the debacle. But the truth is, in most cases, bitter.
I think you're saying that the truth hurts ? I agree, it probably does.
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
-
The only people I see complaining about the quality of articles are the CodeProject users themselves. Most of the crap articles are being posted by Indians (I'm not trying to be mean, I'm just stating a fact). It's really hard to fathom why these people post the empty articles, or as one guy did, posted an article that was a programming question. Perhaps the UI presented on the site needs to be re-thought.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
Most of the crap articles are being posted by Indians
Fixed that for you. :sigh: I feel bad, helpless and embarrassed, but unfortunately you're correct. :(
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
Most of the crap articles are being posted by Indians
Fixed that for you. :sigh: I feel bad, helpless and embarrassed, but unfortunately you're correct. :(
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
There must be some word on the grapevine that posting dross articles to CP gets you a good job. :rolleyes: :~
-
Jonathan [Darka] wrote:
I also feel less likely to post articles as they are soon knocked out of the "recent articles" list by utter crap and thus get noticed less than they might otherwise do.
Maybe just a minor change to the logic, that only edited/moderated articles appear in the recent artciles list. All bar one of the artciles currently in the recent list are unedited artciles.
Simon
I think that's a good idea, CP need to do something before we all stop visiting.
Jonathan Wilkes Darka[Xanya.net]
-
I agree with your approach: new authors should be on probation for the first 3 articles; if they use the Article Submission Wizard to post an article, it automatically gets routed to the editor's queue, just as if they had emailed it. If all of their first 3 articles are rejected, their account gets deleted. I would like to think that reporting articles, voting, etc., would take care of the problem, but that's like shoveling fleas in a barn - they are remedies, not solutions. We need to put up some screens to keep the fleas out.
Best wishes, Hans
[CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]
Hans Dietrich wrote:
I agree with your approach: new authors should be on probation for the first 3 articles; if they use the Article Submission Wizard to post an article, it automatically gets routed to the editor's queue, just as if they had emailed it. If all of their first 3 articles are rejected, their account gets deleted.
Although I agree in concept, imagine what flooding the editor with all these idiot articles will do to that person? CP voting system has the advantage of a distributed effort, rather than one person shouldering the burden, many of us use the voting system to signal good/bad articles. I think if you want a solution, it needs to support a distribution of effort. In other words, we need to find a solution that will allow us to help the editor rather than pushing all this on one or a few people. Would MVPs be willing to review such articles? would another team?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Hans Dietrich wrote:
I agree with your approach: new authors should be on probation for the first 3 articles; if they use the Article Submission Wizard to post an article, it automatically gets routed to the editor's queue, just as if they had emailed it. If all of their first 3 articles are rejected, their account gets deleted.
Although I agree in concept, imagine what flooding the editor with all these idiot articles will do to that person? CP voting system has the advantage of a distributed effort, rather than one person shouldering the burden, many of us use the voting system to signal good/bad articles. I think if you want a solution, it needs to support a distribution of effort. In other words, we need to find a solution that will allow us to help the editor rather than pushing all this on one or a few people. Would MVPs be willing to review such articles? would another team?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
El Corazon wrote:
Would MVPs be willing to review such articles
Well - I did volunteer a while back, but I suspect it got "lost in the post" with Chris.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
There must be some word on the grapevine that posting dross articles to CP gets you a good job. :rolleyes: :~
norm .net wrote:
There must be some word on the grapevine that posting dross articles to CP gets you a good job.
so if I add the number of messages onto my resume I will get more job offers? I have experience in: C/C++ Prolog Lisp Fortran Java Some C# Assembly 80x86 and 68000 3D landscapes Augmented Reality over 10,000 messages posted at the Code Project
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
I am finding that I am visiting Code Project less and less due to the level of utter dross posted by some article writers. Due to the high amount of substandard articles I am starting to wonder what the point in visiting is? (Just look at 3 out of the "ten most recent changes" to see my point) I feel Code Project is starting to get a reputation for substandard articles and a repository for coders of a questionable ability to post their "Resume enhancing" articles. This is worrying as I feel the creators of Code Project never intended for this to happen. How do we restore the reputation? Or Can we?
1. Report the Articles 2. Vote for the Articles. 3. Give me about a day to get something in place we've been playing with...
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
norm .net wrote:
There must be some word on the grapevine that posting dross articles to CP gets you a good job.
so if I add the number of messages onto my resume I will get more job offers? I have experience in: C/C++ Prolog Lisp Fortran Java Some C# Assembly 80x86 and 68000 3D landscapes Augmented Reality over 10,000 messages posted at the Code Project
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
It must be your birthday, you've got the job! :beer:
-
Hans Dietrich wrote:
I agree with your approach: new authors should be on probation for the first 3 articles; if they use the Article Submission Wizard to post an article, it automatically gets routed to the editor's queue, just as if they had emailed it. If all of their first 3 articles are rejected, their account gets deleted.
Although I agree in concept, imagine what flooding the editor with all these idiot articles will do to that person? CP voting system has the advantage of a distributed effort, rather than one person shouldering the burden, many of us use the voting system to signal good/bad articles. I think if you want a solution, it needs to support a distribution of effort. In other words, we need to find a solution that will allow us to help the editor rather than pushing all this on one or a few people. Would MVPs be willing to review such articles? would another team?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
Chris has Spoken, so we should probably wait to see what he comes up with.
Best wishes, Hans
[CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]
-
norm .net wrote:
There must be some word on the grapevine that posting dross articles to CP gets you a good job.
so if I add the number of messages onto my resume I will get more job offers? I have experience in: C/C++ Prolog Lisp Fortran Java Some C# Assembly 80x86 and 68000 3D landscapes Augmented Reality over 10,000 messages posted at the Code Project
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
Prospective employer: So what you're saying is that - given an average of 2 minutes per posting - you've spent two weeks playing about on line? El Corazon: *Squirm*
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
-
I vote comments like yours a 1.
PeterTheGreat wrote:
How do we restore the reputation? Or Can we?
Stop complaining and write some quality articles yourself to raise the overall level of quality. You want to improve CP's reputation? Then start improving it. This is a site, afterall, where the quality of the site is 99% determined by the contributions of the people. The fact that I can contribute articles without going through a lengthy submittal process, and the fact that the members themselves moderate the articles is fantastic. Sure it has flaws, I get p.o'd like everyone else when I get a 1 vote, but overall, I think it's great. Marc
Quite right! I have proactively not submitted a single article, a feat by itself that must have boosted the average article score by more then 1.8 points.
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
-
Prospective employer: So what you're saying is that - given an average of 2 minutes per posting - you've spent two weeks playing about on line? El Corazon: *Squirm*
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
MidwestLimey wrote:
Prospective employer: So what you're saying is that - given an average of 2 minutes per posting - you've spent two weeks playing about on line? El Corazon: *Squirm*
El: Your maths is flawed. It takes far less time to post LOL and :laugh: so the average posting time is brought down quite considerably.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
MidwestLimey wrote:
Prospective employer: So what you're saying is that - given an average of 2 minutes per posting - you've spent two weeks playing about on line? El Corazon: *Squirm*
El: Your maths is flawed. It takes far less time to post LOL and :laugh: so the average posting time is brought down quite considerably.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
It takes far less time to post LOL and so the average posting time is brought down quite considerably.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
I am finding that I am visiting Code Project less and less due to the level of utter dross posted by some article writers. Due to the high amount of substandard articles I am starting to wonder what the point in visiting is? (Just look at 3 out of the "ten most recent changes" to see my point) I feel Code Project is starting to get a reputation for substandard articles and a repository for coders of a questionable ability to post their "Resume enhancing" articles. This is worrying as I feel the creators of Code Project never intended for this to happen. How do we restore the reputation? Or Can we?
-
Quite right! I have proactively not submitted a single article, a feat by itself that must have boosted the average article score by more then 1.8 points.
I'm largely language agnostic
After a while they all bug me :doh:
MidwestLimey wrote:
I have proactively not submitted a single article, a feat by itself that must have boosted the average article score by more then 1.8 points.
:-D I'm sure we all appreciate it. ;P Marc
-
Christian Graus wrote:
eah, and I'm sure that just the right UI will stop all programming questions to the lounge.
I'm trying to be "sensitive" toward the plight of the typical Indian programmer (whose first language isn't English). Besides, I've always been a proponent of changing the interface here. Someone else suggested a 30-day delay in the ability to post articles, but that will just keep the better programmers from registering. Maybe implementing some sort of rudimentary text checking to make sure the article a) contains text, and b) doesn't contain any of the text that is used in the boilerplate template presented in the article submission wizard, and c) contains MORE text than the boilerplate template (of course the stuff in the header tags would be omitted from this comparison).
Christian Graus wrote:
Face it, fact is that our industry has a lot more stupid people in it than used to be the case.
Yeah, I know, but just allowing it to happen without trying to address it is simply not acceptable. I know Chris et al have a lot of other crap to deal with, so I am willing to put my money where my mouth is, and volunteer to help develop code to keep the bad guys at bay. I haven't seen anyone else step up like that - it seems most people just want to complain, or just shake their heads.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
Maybe implementing some sort of rudimentary text checking to make sure the article a) contains text, and b) doesn't contain any of the text that is used in the boilerplate template presented in the article submission wizard, and c) contains MORE text than the boilerplate template (of course the stuff in the header tags would be omitted from this comparison).
We do this. However even simple changes to the text, even just whitespace, can render our checks useless.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
so I am willing to put my money where my mouth is, and volunteer to help develop code to keep the bad guys at bay
That's incredibly kind. I'd welcome any effort to smarten up our checks on whether the template we provide has been 'sufficiently' modified.
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
