How many of you use WPF
-
Bitmap means resolution dependence, and with the every increasing variety of displays out there it makes increasingly more sense to do resolution indepdendent graphics like WPF attempts. I haven't used it that much yet, so I'm still undecided whether I like it or not.
Wout
Why not a bitmap large enough to scale?
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
-
You do realize that modern displays require all graphics to be rasterized prior to actually appearing on the screen... right? The advantage of using a vector image as the source and rasterizing only when you know the exact size and resolution that will be required is that you won't distort or lose detail the way you will when scaling a pre-rasterized image.
Citizen 20.1.01
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
You are over complicating things.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
-
You are over complicating things.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
-
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
You are over complicating things.
Boy... There are a lot of surprises still in store for you.
Citizen 20.1.01
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
You are making things sound more complicated than they need to be.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
-
WPF runs on XP
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
Thanks, but I am well aware of WPF on XP. It's just not the preferred method of generating user interfaces on XP.
CodeWiz51 -- Life is not a spectator sport. I came to play. Code's Musings | Code's Articles
-
Thanks, but I am well aware of WPF on XP. It's just not the preferred method of generating user interfaces on XP.
CodeWiz51 -- Life is not a spectator sport. I came to play. Code's Musings | Code's Articles
No more or less than it is on Vista.
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
-
I'm thinking of just boycotting the technology. Why should I have to learn something new and complicated just for the sake of being up to date? I don't like WPF and how it makes thinks seem messy and more complicated. I should not have to write XML and hoolaguh boolahuh to make a button on a form. WinForms, GDI/+, OpenGL, and DirectX is all we need! Who is with me on this?
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Why should I have to learn something new and complicated just for the sake of being up to date
This is what being a developer is all about. In all seriousness if this isn't what you enjoy then probably time to think of another vocation.
cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
I'm thinking of just boycotting the technology. Why should I have to learn something new and complicated just for the sake of being up to date? I don't like WPF and how it makes thinks seem messy and more complicated. I should not have to write XML and hoolaguh boolahuh to make a button on a form. WinForms, GDI/+, OpenGL, and DirectX is all we need! Who is with me on this?
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
I haven't, but I looked into it for business reasons and was very disappointed. The sample applications I found looked good, but were slow and used a massive amount of system resources (the simplest operation in one applet caused 40% CPU utilization, another used 10% just sitting there.) Looking more into it, it appears that the moment you depart from the simple, WPF becomes a nightmare. Quite honestly, I don't like WinForms much either, especially how it doesn't separate interface and implementation the way traditional dialog boxes do.
Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
-
Why not a bitmap large enough to scale?
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Why not a bitmap large enough to scale?
anisotropism moiré patterns and other aliasing artifacts. Not to mention the memory. How big is big enough to scale? 256x256? 512x512? 1024x1024? 16384x16384?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Why not a bitmap large enough to scale?
anisotropism moiré patterns and other aliasing artifacts. Not to mention the memory. How big is big enough to scale? 256x256? 512x512? 1024x1024? 16384x16384?
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
Windows Vista does it with its explorer icons.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
-
No more or less than it is on Vista.
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
Far less than Vista.
CodeWiz51 -- Life is not a spectator sport. I came to play. Code's Musings | Code's Articles
-
You are making things sound more complicated than they need to be.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
You are making things sound more complicated than they need to be.
No, he is not. Even in OpenGL understanding Rasterization means you understand the results of your operations and hopefully they match your expectations for the code. Otherwise you are playing the sink/swim method of graphics programming. It is NOT that complicated. Everything you do goes through a pipeline process, whether it is GDI or OpenGL is irrelevant, the pipeline process is different depending the graphics foundation you are using, but the process is ultimately the same. There are differences in methodology of the process, for instance GDI is rasterized at every step, where-as OpenGL and Direct3D use deferred rasterization at the end of a frame. One is designed for drawing on a screen and holding it there, the other is designed completely around animation methodologies. Once you realize the process of rasterization, and the need therein, you realize why GDI is slower than DirectX/OpenGL. Rasterizing your process is the foundation of graphics. It isn't like learning how to build cars to learn how to drive one, but it is more like knowing that your car burns gas before you run out somewhere about Thorough, NM and wonder how this happened. Knowing the basics of how something works is very, VERY, good.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Far less than Vista.
CodeWiz51 -- Life is not a spectator sport. I came to play. Code's Musings | Code's Articles
I don't know what makes you say that, but you're plain wrong. There's nothing stopping you using C to write a Windows app for Vista. If you feel that just because the general UI is flashy, you would think it's better to use WPF, that's your decision, but WPF is just an option, in XP or in Vista.
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
-
Windows Vista does it with its explorer icons.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Windows Vista does it with its explorer icons.
and also why expanding windows icons looks ugly, shrinking them always looks odd. The point was trying to find a better way. Whether or not this is a better way will remain to be seen, but exploring the concept has its reasons, and they are many.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Windows Vista does it with its explorer icons.
and also why expanding windows icons looks ugly, shrinking them always looks odd. The point was trying to find a better way. Whether or not this is a better way will remain to be seen, but exploring the concept has its reasons, and they are many.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
El Corazon wrote:
and also why expanding windows icons looks ugly, shrinking them always looks odd
Looks smooth in Vista. Most icons are pretty large so you can expand them without making them look pixelated.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
-
I don't know what makes you say that, but you're plain wrong. There's nothing stopping you using C to write a Windows app for Vista. If you feel that just because the general UI is flashy, you would think it's better to use WPF, that's your decision, but WPF is just an option, in XP or in Vista.
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
Christian Graus wrote:
There's nothing stopping you using C to write a Windows app for Vista.
I hope there are not people who think this is no longer possible! egad, that would be a big misconception of how things work. You can use C/C++ even FORTRAN if you want, heaven forbid even COBOL is available along with all the sharps. You are free to use several methods of GUIs, several methods of graphics.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
El Corazon wrote:
and also why expanding windows icons looks ugly, shrinking them always looks odd
Looks smooth in Vista. Most icons are pretty large so you can expand them without making them look pixelated.
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
CataclysmicQuantum wrote:
Looks smooth in Vista. Most icons are pretty large so you can expand them without making them look pixelated.
which always means more memory for every icon. 100 icons at 128x128 with tri-colored and alpha blended ability means you are using a lot more memory than you need to, per se. And that is assuming that Vista doesn't employ mipmapping techniques for minimizing effects during shrinking, that is applying all sizes below your original, 128x128 & 64x64 & 32x32, etc. This technique is common in 3D interfaces which Vista is finally utilizing for its internal pipeline. However, I do see the aliasing artifacts even in Vista. Searching for the next level is what programming is all about, nothing ever remains completely the same. Something is always changing.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
-
Christian Graus wrote:
There's nothing stopping you using C to write a Windows app for Vista.
I hope there are not people who think this is no longer possible! egad, that would be a big misconception of how things work. You can use C/C++ even FORTRAN if you want, heaven forbid even COBOL is available along with all the sharps. You are free to use several methods of GUIs, several methods of graphics.
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others."
I have to assume that isn't what he means, but failing that, I'm not sure what he does mean, I guess he assumes that MS themselves are pushing for WPF apps, which may well be true, doesn't mean we have to use it.
Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
-
I'm thinking of just boycotting the technology. Why should I have to learn something new and complicated just for the sake of being up to date? I don't like WPF and how it makes thinks seem messy and more complicated. I should not have to write XML and hoolaguh boolahuh to make a button on a form. WinForms, GDI/+, OpenGL, and DirectX is all we need! Who is with me on this?
The Digital World. It is an amazing place in which we primitive humans interact. Our flesh made this synthetic machine. You see, we are so smart, we know a lot of stuff. We were grown from cells that came from the universe, which the matter and physics I'm typing in it is amazing how the universe is working. Human life is very amazing. How I experience this sh*t its like wow.
It makes Sense to boycout, if u have something inliue of it, giving similar quality of graphic. Although, agreed, WPF has enourmous learning curve involved, it is not as we developers want it, but, it really does give impressive UI and Looks; Hope, Google or Yahoo come up with something they can beat WPF, or atleast, Adobe will (i think), or Adobe will be washed away!
ravis
-
Not me. You don't develop for a living do you? 99% of what clients look for is the Look and Feel of an application rather than the feature set. besides, you can do some really cool things with WPF.
"Every time Lotus Notes starts up, somewhere a puppy, a kitten, a lamb, and a baby seal are killed. Lotus Notes is a conspiracy by the forces of Satan to drive us over the brink into madness. The CRC-32 for each file in the installation includes the numbers 666." Gary Wheeler "You're an idiot." John Simmons, THE Outlaw programmer "I realised that all of my best anecdotes started with "So there we were, pissed". Pete O'Hanlon
Yes you can do lots of neat things with WPF, but your statement that 99% of what clients are after is look and feel is just madness. Clients (well mine anyway) want functionality (100% of what they expect) and they want it to be pleasing to use. 99% just reaks of style over content. To the OP, I agree. I have used WPF on projects where I have been a hired hand but I wouldn't use it out of choice.
The only thing unpredictable about me is just how predictable I'm going to be.