Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Microsoft should euthanize Vista

Microsoft should euthanize Vista

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comcollaborationquestionannouncement
32 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    Marc Clifton wrote:

    WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G?

    I guess the main concern is how much of that ends up in RAM when you boot.

    Marc Clifton wrote:

    About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location

    Yeah, I like that.

    Marc Clifton wrote:

    Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"!

    Like they would care.

    Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

    E Offline
    E Offline
    elektrowolf
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Christian Graus wrote:

    I guess the main concern is how much of that ends up in RAM when you boot.

    Vista loads some libraries to make programs start faster. This is why it seems like Vista is eating up all your RAM.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Marc Clifton

      Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

      Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

      J Offline
      J Offline
      jchigg2000
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      I personally wouldn't go back to XP. I have Vista on both my laptop & desktop (both w/ VS2008) and am quite pleased with it.

      B D P L 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • J jchigg2000

        I personally wouldn't go back to XP. I have Vista on both my laptop & desktop (both w/ VS2008) and am quite pleased with it.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        blakey404
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        aha! your the one person in every million who likes it! your a celebrity!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J jchigg2000

          I personally wouldn't go back to XP. I have Vista on both my laptop & desktop (both w/ VS2008) and am quite pleased with it.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Duncan Edwards Jones
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Me too - and I have bought it for some of my less technical family as well as the savings from less support disasters (I accidentally deleted something from \system32\ because I got an email saying it might be a virus etc) more than pays for the software.

          '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jchigg2000

            I personally wouldn't go back to XP. I have Vista on both my laptop & desktop (both w/ VS2008) and am quite pleased with it.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pete OHanlon
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            I also like it. I wouldn't dream of going back to anything other than Windows 2003. XP is just plain awful.

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            My blog | My articles

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Marc Clifton

              Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

              Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

              R Offline
              R Offline
              realJSOP
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Marc Clifton wrote:

              In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G?

              Ummm, I care - I don't have a 1TB drive in any of my systems. That (15gb install) is 25% of the available space on your standard corporate Dell PC. The Windows folder on my system at work is 10gb (I'm running the Business edition). I'll check my laptop tonight (Home Premium).

              "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
              -----
              "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Marc Clifton

                Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

                Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Losinger
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                i like Vista. all the haters can go soak their heads.

                image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E elektrowolf

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  I guess the main concern is how much of that ends up in RAM when you boot.

                  Vista loads some libraries to make programs start faster. This is why it seems like Vista is eating up all your RAM.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dexterus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Vista loads about 600 MB for its own stuff and every app it considers you'll use is memory cached (afaik it's a mechanism that learns so will take a while for it to do well while start a new up after it's learned will be as slow as XP or something). So in practice all your memory is used, or almost all but most of it actually decently.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jchigg2000

                    I personally wouldn't go back to XP. I have Vista on both my laptop & desktop (both w/ VS2008) and am quite pleased with it.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    So I won't be able to sell you an XP license? Still got some in stock. Priced at $300,- each of course :-D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dexterus

                      Vista loads about 600 MB for its own stuff and every app it considers you'll use is memory cached (afaik it's a mechanism that learns so will take a while for it to do well while start a new up after it's learned will be as slow as XP or something). So in practice all your memory is used, or almost all but most of it actually decently.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      blakey404
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      can this "feature**" be switched off. i hate it. **which sounds like a bug to me ;)

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Marc Clifton

                        Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

                        Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jerry Hammond
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        I recently migrated to Vista and I would never go back. I really do not get all the whinning. But, given what I know about human nature I chalk it up to luddite-ism.

                        “If we are all in agreement on the decision - then I propose we postpone further discussion of this matter until our next meeting to give ourselves time to develop disagreement and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is all about.”-Alfred P. Sloan

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R realJSOP

                          Marc Clifton wrote:

                          In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G?

                          Ummm, I care - I don't have a 1TB drive in any of my systems. That (15gb install) is 25% of the available space on your standard corporate Dell PC. The Windows folder on my system at work is 10gb (I'm running the Business edition). I'll check my laptop tonight (Home Premium).

                          "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                          -----
                          "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Steve Thresher
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                          That (15gb install) is 25% of the available space on your standard corporate Dell PC

                          Do you know this for a fact or are you basing your figures on the standard corporate Dell PC for running XP? I suspect corporations will upgrade their hardware with the o/s in which case the available space will be more like 150GB which means the o/s still only takes 10% which matches XP (approx 6GB install). Entirely reasonable I think.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Marc Clifton

                            Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

                            Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                            W Offline
                            W Offline
                            wout de zeeuw
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            The missing 'up' button in explorer is my biggest gripe with Vista. The up button was sheer genious, it was a big button that you almost could find blind folded. And now when you got a big directory tree (like every dev has), you have to mess around with the address bar, ugh. A nice example of getting too academic about simple matters.

                            Wout

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Marc Clifton

                              Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

                              Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nemanja Trifunovic
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Vista is good - especially the 64-bit edition. We have conditional variables[^] now :jig:

                              Programming Blog utf8-cpp

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B blakey404

                                can this "feature**" be switched off. i hate it. **which sounds like a bug to me ;)

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Dan Neely
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                You can disable the service, but WHY? The cached apps are dumped instantly when running apps need more memory, so it doesn't affect the performance of running applications at all. Disabling it will only slow the startup of new apps.

                                You know, every time I tried to win a bar-bet about being able to count to 1000 using my fingers I always got punched out when I reached 4.... -- El Corazon

                                B G 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • D Dan Neely

                                  You can disable the service, but WHY? The cached apps are dumped instantly when running apps need more memory, so it doesn't affect the performance of running applications at all. Disabling it will only slow the startup of new apps.

                                  You know, every time I tried to win a bar-bet about being able to count to 1000 using my fingers I always got punched out when I reached 4.... -- El Corazon

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  blakey404
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  in theory. in practice i'd like to see what actually happens.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Steve Thresher

                                    John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                    That (15gb install) is 25% of the available space on your standard corporate Dell PC

                                    Do you know this for a fact or are you basing your figures on the standard corporate Dell PC for running XP? I suspect corporations will upgrade their hardware with the o/s in which case the available space will be more like 150GB which means the o/s still only takes 10% which matches XP (approx 6GB install). Entirely reasonable I think.

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    blakey404
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    you suspect wrong

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B blakey404

                                      you suspect wrong

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Steve Thresher
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      Are you trying to tell me that corporations will expect to run the latest o/s on 7 year old hardware?

                                      AxisFirst For Business

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Marc Clifton

                                        Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

                                        Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        peterchen
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        Marc Clifton wrote:

                                        WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G?

                                        Me, because the bottleneck isn't disk space.

                                        We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
                                        blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Marc Clifton

                                          Article here[^] It's a rather droll article. I love statements like this: It slows me as a human because it is so hard to use," said a friend of mine, a Microsoft developer who for obvious reasons does not want to be quoted by name. This developer added that his whole team dislikes Vista, which requires about 15 gigabytes of free hard-drive space on a PC, according to the company. In an age where we have terabyte hard drives, WTF (who, not what) cares about 15G? Now, I'm not defending Vista! About the only two things I like about it is that I can click on the file path in the address bar and it takes me to that location, and when I create a folder for a download it automatically opens the folder. But even that has drawbacks. The address bar usage falls apart when I have a narrow window with large folder names, and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level. (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?) Anyways, her conversation with an HP salesperson was amusing, but the article itself is rather worthless. Imagine though, if 5 million CP members signed that petition to keep XP alive "indefinitely"! :laugh: Marc

                                          Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          David Crow
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          Marc Clifton wrote:

                                          ...and I can never remember the keystroke for navigating UP one level.

                                          Alt+Left Arrow

                                          Marc Clifton wrote:

                                          (What idiot decided to remove that icon from Explorer?)

                                          Unless your view has changed, it should be in the upper-left corner. At least that's the way it is for me.

                                          "Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown

                                          "To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne

                                          M R 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups