Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. C# or Java ??

C# or Java ??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpjavaquestion
73 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R rockNroll

    Hi, I have got a new project which is based on image processing. Which language will be better for this project.. C# or Java and why ? cheers rNr

    L Offline
    L Offline
    leckey 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Assembly.

    Shhhhh..... http://craptasticnation.blogspot.com/[^]

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R rockNroll

      Hi, I have got a new project which is based on image processing. Which language will be better for this project.. C# or Java and why ? cheers rNr

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Bert delaVega
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Turbo Pascal Seriously, it depends on the business need/requirement/accessibility. Image processing is too vague a question. What type of processing? What type of environment?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R rockNroll

        Hi, I have got a new project which is based on image processing. Which language will be better for this project.. C# or Java and why ? cheers rNr

        F Offline
        F Offline
        Fatbuddha 1
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        If it should be platform independent then Java. If it should be Windows, then C#, espacially if you have any user Interface. Cheers

        You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R rockNroll

          Hi, I have got a new project which is based on image processing. Which language will be better for this project.. C# or Java and why ? cheers rNr

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jeremy Tierman
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Cobol or Fortran for really intensive stuff :rolleyes:

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R rockNroll

            Hi, I have got a new project which is based on image processing. Which language will be better for this project.. C# or Java and why ? cheers rNr

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pete OHanlon
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Have you considered COBOL.NET? I'm just asking. ;P

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            My blog | My articles

            L V 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              Logo[^]

              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

              J Offline
              J Offline
              John M Drescher
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              :laugh: I believe I learned that in the 70s.

              John

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jeremy Tierman

                Cobol or Fortran for really intensive stuff :rolleyes:

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pete OHanlon
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Damn - you beat me to the BOLOC representation.

                Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                My blog | My articles

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Pete OHanlon

                  Have you considered COBOL.NET? I'm just asking. ;P

                  Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                  My blog | My articles

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  COBOL - learnt that on this http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/computers/gallery/cdc/6600.jsp[^] and before you ask, yep, I'm almost that old !

                  P B 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    COBOL - learnt that on this http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/computers/gallery/cdc/6600.jsp[^] and before you ask, yep, I'm almost that old !

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Pete OHanlon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Ah - I managed to avoid COBOL. I have more of a mathematical background, so I was more on the FORTRAN, APL and C track.

                    Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                    My blog | My articles

                    L G J 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • P Pete OHanlon

                      Ah - I managed to avoid COBOL. I have more of a mathematical background, so I was more on the FORTRAN, APL and C track.

                      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                      My blog | My articles

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Never tried Fortran. But did use PLAN on an ICL 1900 series, as well as COBOL and Assembler on an IBM 360. Those were the days when timeshare was common and input via a punched card/tape after agency punching them from 80 column hand written coding sheets.

                      P L 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Never tried Fortran. But did use PLAN on an ICL 1900 series, as well as COBOL and Assembler on an IBM 360. Those were the days when timeshare was common and input via a punched card/tape after agency punching them from 80 column hand written coding sheets.

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Pete OHanlon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        I remember those days so well.

                        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                        My blog | My articles

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Pete OHanlon

                          Ah - I managed to avoid COBOL. I have more of a mathematical background, so I was more on the FORTRAN, APL and C track.

                          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                          My blog | My articles

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          GuyThiebaut
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          I learn't COBOL and worked for a year programming it - makes bloated VB look positively anorexic in comparison.

                          Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G GuyThiebaut

                            I learn't COBOL and worked for a year programming it - makes bloated VB look positively anorexic in comparison.

                            Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            Pete OHanlon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            You have my sympathies.

                            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                            My blog | My articles

                            G 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris Losinger

                              Logo[^]

                              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Brady Kelly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              :laugh::laugh:    :laugh::laugh:

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R rockNroll

                                Hi, I have got a new project which is based on image processing. Which language will be better for this project.. C# or Java and why ? cheers rNr

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                Brady Kelly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Clarion!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  COBOL - learnt that on this http://www.cisl.ucar.edu/computers/gallery/cdc/6600.jsp[^] and before you ask, yep, I'm almost that old !

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Brady Kelly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  Call that old?  I learned COBOL on coding sheets! :suss: I actually did, at a programming college in 1996.  We only did hands-on practical once for each of three modules.  Every second Saturday morning was a gruelling five hour practical written in pencil on coding sheets.

                                  G L 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Pete OHanlon

                                    You have my sympathies.

                                    Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                    My blog | My articles

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    GuyThiebaut
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Yes thanks, I was going to say COBOLocks but I can't say that in the lounge can I? Oh no I went and said it :rolleyes:

                                    Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Brady Kelly

                                      Call that old?  I learned COBOL on coding sheets! :suss: I actually did, at a programming college in 1996.  We only did hands-on practical once for each of three modules.  Every second Saturday morning was a gruelling five hour practical written in pencil on coding sheets.

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      GuyThiebaut
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      When I learn't COBOL the tutors used to get a ruler out to measure indentation on the paper. I kid you not, if it was two centimetres out we had to type it out again. We were also taught to read code dumps in hex. But this was back in 1990. So I am surprised that in 1996 you were still doing this sort of thing - maybe it's just the sadistic trainers who teach COBOL.

                                      Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B Brady Kelly

                                        Call that old?  I learned COBOL on coding sheets! :suss: I actually did, at a programming college in 1996.  We only did hands-on practical once for each of three modules.  Every second Saturday morning was a gruelling five hour practical written in pencil on coding sheets.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        Brady Kelly wrote:

                                        at a programming college in 1996

                                        You must be younger than you sound. My induction into COBOL was in the early 1970's, that's when the Ford Escort Mk I was still in production.

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G GuyThiebaut

                                          When I learn't COBOL the tutors used to get a ruler out to measure indentation on the paper. I kid you not, if it was two centimetres out we had to type it out again. We were also taught to read code dumps in hex. But this was back in 1990. So I am surprised that in 1996 you were still doing this sort of thing - maybe it's just the sadistic trainers who teach COBOL.

                                          Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          Brady Kelly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          They wanted to teach correct coding without relying on a compiler to identify errors.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups