Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Basic Physics Savvy Quiz

Basic Physics Savvy Quiz

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
phphtmlvisual-studiocomgame-dev
46 Posts 31 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L leppie

    http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

    xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
    IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

    M Offline
    M Offline
    MidwestLimey
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    72.5% without cheating .. hmmm this seems to be a CP trend.


    I'm largely language agnostic


    After a while they all bug me :doh:


    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L leppie

      http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

      xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
      IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

      Z Offline
      Z Offline
      Zach Burnett
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      77.5% It appears as though I've forgotten my basics, but darnint bring on the fluid dynamics.

      Zach

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L leppie

        http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

        xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
        IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

        H Offline
        H Offline
        hairy_hats
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        95% without cheating.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L leppie

          http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

          xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
          IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Sebastian Schneider
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          85% without cheating. Some errors could be the result of misunderstandings, since I am not a native speaker. Errors in: Force is a form of energy Energy is the ability to do work (misconception about the ability to do work, but not a misunderstanding) Shanda drives around a track Clouds are water vapor (possible misunderstanding - I thought a "vapor" was what the text describes) Ice melts and water freezes at the same temperature Voltage is the force which pushes electrons through wires (possible misunderstanding) However, I now know which parts of my physics knowledge I need to work on...

          Cheers, Sebastian -- "If it was two men, the non-driver would have challenged the driver to simply crash through the gates. The macho image thing, you know." - Marc Clifton

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L leppie

            http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

            xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
            IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            92.5%. It was interesting to re-read the questions afterwards. Two of the ones I got wrong were due to my misreading the question. The other one I just didn't know. Cheers, Drew.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H hairy_hats

              95% without cheating.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mladen Jankovic
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Steve_Harris wrote:

              95%

              :omg:

              Steve_Harris Biography:

              Started off with a chemistry degree...

              Oh well... :cool:

              Mostly, when you see programmers, they aren't doing anything. One of the attractive things about programmers is that you cannot tell whether or not they are working simply by looking at them. Very often they're sitting there seemingly drinking coffee and gossiping, or just staring into space. What the programmer is trying to do is get a handle on all the individual and unrelated ideas that are scampering around in his head. (Charles M Strauss)

              H 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L leppie

                http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                80%, but guessed on a lot of them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L leppie

                  http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                  xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                  IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                  V Offline
                  V Offline
                  Vincent Curry
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  95% without cheating. I did rush a bit, so perhaps should have spent longer on the two questions I got wrong... I suppose I should admit to having done Mechanical Engineering at University...

                  Vincent www.pub-olympics.com

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V Vincent Curry

                    95% without cheating. I did rush a bit, so perhaps should have spent longer on the two questions I got wrong... I suppose I should admit to having done Mechanical Engineering at University...

                    Vincent www.pub-olympics.com

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    Eurosid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    I got 95% as well. :-\ I have engineering degrees, though. Hence my dopey questions in programming forums. :sigh:

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L leppie

                      http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                      xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                      IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dalek Dave
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      80% but disagree with Q35. It states the small ampage required to be fatal. OK I buy that. It also asks if a car battery can electrocute. I said YES. It said the answer was no. The question did not ask whether the battery would FATALLY electrocute. I speak from experience here, Car batteries give a hell of a wallop! Maybe not fatal , but electrocution nonetheless! Bad Question! Other than that I am appalled at the ones I got wrong! (2.2 in Physics and I missed a couple of pearlers!) :)

                      ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                      L P 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dalek Dave

                        80% but disagree with Q35. It states the small ampage required to be fatal. OK I buy that. It also asks if a car battery can electrocute. I said YES. It said the answer was no. The question did not ask whether the battery would FATALLY electrocute. I speak from experience here, Car batteries give a hell of a wallop! Maybe not fatal , but electrocution nonetheless! Bad Question! Other than that I am appalled at the ones I got wrong! (2.2 in Physics and I missed a couple of pearlers!) :)

                        ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Dalek Dave wrote:

                        Maybe not fatal , but electrocution nonetheless!

                        Ummmm... me thinks electrocution is fatal by definition[^]

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                          Maybe not fatal , but electrocution nonetheless!

                          Ummmm... me thinks electrocution is fatal by definition[^]

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dalek Dave
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Ah thats just facts, you can prove anything with facts! I have been electrocuted several times, car batteries and household electrics. To define it as death is like saying hanging is fatal. Mediaeval Punishment was often Hanging until not quite dead before drawing and quartering,(ok these were the fatal bits. As you're an American, perhaps you can answer me this, is Electrocution still used as a death penalty in The States?

                          ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                          L M S 4 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • L leppie

                            http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                            xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                            IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            R Giskard Reventlov
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            I got 62.5% by randomly selecting true/false without reading the questions.

                            me, me, me

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dalek Dave

                              Ah thats just facts, you can prove anything with facts! I have been electrocuted several times, car batteries and household electrics. To define it as death is like saying hanging is fatal. Mediaeval Punishment was often Hanging until not quite dead before drawing and quartering,(ok these were the fatal bits. As you're an American, perhaps you can answer me this, is Electrocution still used as a death penalty in The States?

                              ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Electrocution is currently an optional form of execution in Alabama, Florida, South Carolina and Virginia. In Kentucky and Tennessee, the electric chair has been retired except for those whose capital crimes were committed prior to 1998. The electric chair is an alternate form of execution approved for potential use in Illinois and Oklahoma if other forms of execution are found unconstitutional in the state at the time of execution.

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Dalek Dave

                                Ah thats just facts, you can prove anything with facts! I have been electrocuted several times, car batteries and household electrics. To define it as death is like saying hanging is fatal. Mediaeval Punishment was often Hanging until not quite dead before drawing and quartering,(ok these were the fatal bits. As you're an American, perhaps you can answer me this, is Electrocution still used as a death penalty in The States?

                                ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                martin_hughes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                Dalek Dave wrote:

                                I have been electrocuted several times, car batteries and household electrics.

                                If only you'd put a bit more effort in at Uni and got yourself that 2.1; perhaps you wouldn't have been electrocuted quite so often :)

                                ***The collected future Mrs. Martin Hughes***

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L leppie

                                  http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                                  xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                                  IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Dan Neely
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  87.5 with 2 misreads.

                                  You know, every time I tried to win a bar-bet about being able to count to 1000 using my fingers I always got punched out when I reached 4.... -- El Corazon

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M martin_hughes

                                    Dalek Dave wrote:

                                    I have been electrocuted several times, car batteries and household electrics.

                                    If only you'd put a bit more effort in at Uni and got yourself that 2.1; perhaps you wouldn't have been electrocuted quite so often :)

                                    ***The collected future Mrs. Martin Hughes***

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    Dalek Dave
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    I so laughed at that! :) Fixing old Cars was never likely to get me an extra mark! And the household electrocution was because I pulled the Correctly Marked Fuse out of the Fusebox, unfortunately whilst it was a correctly marked fuse, it was in the Wrong slot. 240V ac up the jacksy was not my idea of fun! My arm was numb for hours! You are right though, I should have worked harder, but a desmond is better than a third!

                                    ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Electrocution is currently an optional form of execution in Alabama, Florida, South Carolina and Virginia. In Kentucky and Tennessee, the electric chair has been retired except for those whose capital crimes were committed prior to 1998. The electric chair is an alternate form of execution approved for potential use in Illinois and Oklahoma if other forms of execution are found unconstitutional in the state at the time of execution.

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Dalek Dave
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      Wouldn't a bullet be quicker, cheaper and more environmentally friendly?

                                      ------------------------------------ "I want you to imagine I have a blaster in my hand" - Zaphod Beeblebrox. "You DO have a blaster in your hand" - Freighter Pilot "Yeah, so you don't have to tax your imagination too hard" - Zaphod Beeblebrox

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L leppie

                                        http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                                        xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                                        IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        Gary Wheeler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        90%. Two of the questions were stated ambiguously (in one, the question treats acceleration as an unsigned quantity). Not bad, given that it's been 28 years since my college physics classes.

                                        Software Zen: delete this;

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L leppie

                                          http://www.intuitor.com/physics_test/PhysicsSavvy.html[^] Got 75% without Google or cheating :)

                                          xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                                          IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 4a out now (29 May 2008)

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Chris Losinger
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          72.5 though one was a misreading (thought it said "millimeter" not "milliliter") and one i somehow checked the wrong box. and, i protest the "electrocution" question. it relies on the specific meaning of "electrocution" (always fatal) and not the common usage (any shock will do). not exactly a physics question.

                                          image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups