Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. VBer can't understand LINQ

VBer can't understand LINQ

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharplinqcomalgorithmsquestion
27 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Shog9 0

    Sam Rahimi wrote:

    I used it for about a month, no joke, and was writing code faster than I did in VB...

    To be fair, you can replace C# with "x86 assembler" and have the same experience... :-\

    Citizen 20.1.01

    'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Sam Rahimi
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    I don't know if a month of X86 assembler would have me writing apps more productively than using the .NET framework LOL :)

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Michael Sync

      As I used to do both VB.NET and C# nearly everyday, I used to say that VB.NET or C# is really not matter for me.. I've been doing this for 4 years without any problems. but when I started doing LINQ, the syntax that we can use in VB.NET and C# are quite different.... Actually, it's not about LINQ. It's about the inconsistent feature of C# 3.0 and vb.net 9.0.. For example: I can use "var" in C# but not in VB.NET. I can directly assign the XML code to a variable in VB.NET but i can't do that in C#.. So, i think the developer won't be able to switch from C# to VB.NET so easily if C# team and VB.NET team keep on doing that way...

      Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)

      modified on Friday, July 18, 2008 12:21 PM

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Big Daddy Farang
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Michael Sync wrote:

      in C# but not in C#.

      You might want to fix that. :)

      BDF A learned fool is more a fool than an ignorant fool. -- Moliere

      M 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • B Big Daddy Farang

        Michael Sync wrote:

        in C# but not in C#.

        You might want to fix that. :)

        BDF A learned fool is more a fool than an ignorant fool. -- Moliere

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Michael Sync
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Big Daddy Farang wrote:

        You might want to fix that

        Oh! sorry.. :) fixed. Thanks a lot, man :)

        Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Sam Rahimi

          I don't know if a month of X86 assembler would have me writing apps more productively than using the .NET framework LOL :)

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Shog9 0
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Half-way joking, but... yeah. Last time i had to write a significant amount of VB it pretty much put me off coding altogether for a while. Wretched language... :rolleyes:

          Citizen 20.1.01

          'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Big Daddy Farang

            Michael Sync wrote:

            in C# but not in C#.

            You might want to fix that. :)

            BDF A learned fool is more a fool than an ignorant fool. -- Moliere

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Michael Sync
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            thanks. I'm not sure why my reply to your post goes to my own message. :(

            Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Michael Sync

              thanks. I'm not sure why my reply to your post goes to my own message. :(

              Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Michael Sync
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              oh.. my reply that goes wrong move back to your message correctly.. everything looks like magic these days..

              Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Not Active

                I was searching around for books and checking the comments and found this one to be humorous. "It would be nice to have an author approach LINQ from a VB programming point. I really don't want to have to rewrite everything into C# just because no one seems to want to publish a book on LINQ using VB." http://www.amazon.com/review/R1MZ6Z4KBFP5BV/ref=cm_cr_dp_cmt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0735624003&nodeID=283155#wasThisHelpful[^]


                only two letters away from being an asset

                Richard Andrew x64R Online
                Richard Andrew x64R Online
                Richard Andrew x64
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Let's not be too hard on VB, after all, VB is the gateway language. People start with VB and then move on to other languages.

                “Cannot find REALITY.SYS...Universe Halted.” ~ God on phone with Microsoft Customer Support

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                  Let's not be too hard on VB, after all, VB is the gateway language. People start with VB and then move on to other languages.

                  “Cannot find REALITY.SYS...Universe Halted.” ~ God on phone with Microsoft Customer Support

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Not Active
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


                  only two letters away from being an asset

                  P S Richard Andrew x64R 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • M Michael Sync

                    oh.. my reply that goes wrong move back to your message correctly.. everything looks like magic these days..

                    Thanks and Regards, Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Big Daddy Farang
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Michael Sync wrote:

                    everything looks like magic these days..

                    As it should be! :-D

                    BDF A learned fool is more a fool than an ignorant fool. -- Moliere

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Not Active

                      I agree that you should be able to read both. As for using them both, you should also, however, I've found I'm more proficient in C#


                      only two letters away from being an asset

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      keyboard warrior
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Mark Nischalke wrote:

                      I've found I'm more proficient in C#

                      i agree. i have been able to hack into alien computers i never could have with VB. ;P hopefully you read the article a few posts up before you read this...

                      ----------------------------------------------------------- "When I first saw it, I just thought that you really, really enjoyed programming in java." - Leslie Sanford

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Not Active

                        Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


                        only two letters away from being an asset

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Paul Conrad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        Mark Nischalke wrote:

                        the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved

                        He needs to be introduced to Lisp and all the ( ) then :rolleyes:

                        "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Not Active

                          Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


                          only two letters away from being an asset

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Scorch
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          He should try C;; err...++ then ;P

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Not Active

                            Not being hard on VB. Just found it humorous that the guy appeared to be totally lost when semi-colons were involved :)


                            only two letters away from being an asset

                            Richard Andrew x64R Online
                            Richard Andrew x64R Online
                            Richard Andrew x64
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Mark Nischalke wrote:

                            Not being hard on VB.

                            You're right, I didn't pay close enough attention before opening my big mouth.

                            “Cannot find REALITY.SYS...Universe Halted.” ~ God on phone with Microsoft Customer Support

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Sam Rahimi

                              C# seems scary if you come from VBLand, like I did... I used it for about a month, no joke, and was writing code faster than I did in VB... I'd advise everyone to switch over. In my personal, biased opinion :)

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Oakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Sam Rahimi wrote:

                              I'd advise everyone to switch over. In my personal, biased opinion

                              I go back and forth without much of a hiccup. I've found that because VB is more verbose, it's easier to maintain which is a point in its favor IMHO, but usually its the shop that decides not the hired gun. Unless one wants and has long-term job security, not being able to write both is, again imho, like a man with one leg trying to ride a bike.

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M MidwestLimey

                                I still find it scary ".net developers" can't do both.


                                I'm largely language agnostic


                                After a while they all bug me :doh:


                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stuart Dootson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                MidwestLimey wrote:

                                I still find it scary ".net developers" can't won't do both.

                                That covers the C# developers :)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Not Active

                                  I was searching around for books and checking the comments and found this one to be humorous. "It would be nice to have an author approach LINQ from a VB programming point. I really don't want to have to rewrite everything into C# just because no one seems to want to publish a book on LINQ using VB." http://www.amazon.com/review/R1MZ6Z4KBFP5BV/ref=cm_cr_dp_cmt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0735624003&nodeID=283155#wasThisHelpful[^]


                                  only two letters away from being an asset

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Roger Wright
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  I find this humorous because, every time I try to find a solution on MSDN for a C# project, it returns a VB example as a response.

                                  "A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups