Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. Managed C++/CLI
  4. Reference Casting question.

Reference Casting question.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Managed C++/CLI
questioncsharp
17 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterdrozd

    I tried it and it does not work. It may be that I separated the class to a header file from the implemenation.

    System::Boolean DataEvent16::IsActive::get()
    {
    System::Boolean data = (System::Boolean)(((* _Event) & 0x02) != 0); <--fails here.
    return data;
    }

    header file
    property System::Boolean IsActive
    {
    System::Boolean get();
    }

    this still fails. I am trying to get bits from an unsigned short and pass back to C# the value of the bits. I tried a union with a structure to define the bits and tried to set a variable that had all the bits as a System::UInt16 but it would not let me assign the * (System::Uint16 ^ ) to the unmanaged data type so I had to switch gears and try this method. doing a return when the class is implemented inline works fine however I can not use the class in another CPP file as a class variable because I could not make one class aware of the other with out a header. so I separated them. this led to problems with visual studio 2005 C++ CLI This should be a simple item but it's starting to take up so much time. :sigh: thanks -- Pete :)

    modified on Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:34 AM

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Salsbery
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    led mike and I can't reproduce the error. Here's how I tested:

    UInt16 ^_Event = gcnew UInt16(4);
    Boolean boolean = (((*_Event) & 0x01) != false);

    You don't need the (System::Boolean) cast. The != operator already returns a boolean. The only thing I can think of based on the code you've shown is _Event isn't really a UInt16 ^. Mark

    Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L led mike

      Mark Salsbery wrote:

      I don't know what's up with that - not enough info for me.

      Yeah I know, I plugged this in and ran it just fine

      System::Boolean data = (System::Boolean)(((* _Event) & 0x01) != false);

      led mike

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mark Salsbery
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      I did this:

      UInt16 ^ _Event = gcnew UInt16(4);
      Boolean boolean = (((*_Event) & 0x01) != false);

      *shrug*

      Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mark Salsbery

        led mike and I can't reproduce the error. Here's how I tested:

        UInt16 ^_Event = gcnew UInt16(4);
        Boolean boolean = (((*_Event) & 0x01) != false);

        You don't need the (System::Boolean) cast. The != operator already returns a boolean. The only thing I can think of based on the code you've shown is _Event isn't really a UInt16 ^. Mark

        Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

        P Offline
        P Offline
        peterdrozd
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        here is part of the header file.

        public ref class DataEvent16
        {
        private:
        System::UInt16 ^ _Event;

        public:
            DataEvent16(System::UInt16 ^ Event);
            DataEvent16();
            property System::UInt16 RawData
            {
                System::UInt16 get();
                void set ( System::UInt16 value);
            }
            property System::UInt16 IsSet
            {
                System::UInt16  get();
            }
            property System::Boolean IsActive
            {
                System::Boolean get();
            }
        

        };

        Implementation file

        DataEvent16::vDataEvent16(System::UInt16 ^ Event)
        {
        _Event = Event;
        }
        DataEvent16::vDataEvent16()
        {
        _Event = gcnew System::UInt16(0);
        }
        System::Boolean vDataEvent16::IsActive::get()
        {
        System::Boolean data = (System::Boolean)(((* _Event) & 0x02) != 0);
        return data;
        }

        this will compile but explode. on the boolean statement. I know it seems like overkill but I have tried several iterations. :)

        M 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • P peterdrozd

          I tried it and it does not work. It may be that I separated the class to a header file from the implemenation.

          System::Boolean DataEvent16::IsActive::get()
          {
          System::Boolean data = (System::Boolean)(((* _Event) & 0x02) != 0); <--fails here.
          return data;
          }

          header file
          property System::Boolean IsActive
          {
          System::Boolean get();
          }

          this still fails. I am trying to get bits from an unsigned short and pass back to C# the value of the bits. I tried a union with a structure to define the bits and tried to set a variable that had all the bits as a System::UInt16 but it would not let me assign the * (System::Uint16 ^ ) to the unmanaged data type so I had to switch gears and try this method. doing a return when the class is implemented inline works fine however I can not use the class in another CPP file as a class variable because I could not make one class aware of the other with out a header. so I separated them. this led to problems with visual studio 2005 C++ CLI This should be a simple item but it's starting to take up so much time. :sigh: thanks -- Pete :)

          modified on Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:34 AM

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mark Salsbery
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Are you sure the C# side is providing a System::Uint16 ^ and not just a System::Uint16? A System::Uint16 ^ (reference to a value type) is kind of unconventional...

          Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mark Salsbery

            I did this:

            UInt16 ^ _Event = gcnew UInt16(4);
            Boolean boolean = (((*_Event) & 0x01) != false);

            *shrug*

            Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

            L Offline
            L Offline
            led mike
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Mark Salsbery wrote:

            I did this:

            and it didn't throw any exception right?

            led mike

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P peterdrozd

              here is part of the header file.

              public ref class DataEvent16
              {
              private:
              System::UInt16 ^ _Event;

              public:
                  DataEvent16(System::UInt16 ^ Event);
                  DataEvent16();
                  property System::UInt16 RawData
                  {
                      System::UInt16 get();
                      void set ( System::UInt16 value);
                  }
                  property System::UInt16 IsSet
                  {
                      System::UInt16  get();
                  }
                  property System::Boolean IsActive
                  {
                      System::Boolean get();
                  }
              

              };

              Implementation file

              DataEvent16::vDataEvent16(System::UInt16 ^ Event)
              {
              _Event = Event;
              }
              DataEvent16::vDataEvent16()
              {
              _Event = gcnew System::UInt16(0);
              }
              System::Boolean vDataEvent16::IsActive::get()
              {
              System::Boolean data = (System::Boolean)(((* _Event) & 0x02) != 0);
              return data;
              }

              this will compile but explode. on the boolean statement. I know it seems like overkill but I have tried several iterations. :)

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mark Salsbery
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              I had to remove the 'v's (vDataEvent16, vDataEvent16) to get your code to compile, but it worked fine in VS 2008. Mark

              Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L led mike

                Mark Salsbery wrote:

                I did this:

                and it didn't throw any exception right?

                led mike

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mark Salsbery
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Correctamundo!

                Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P peterdrozd

                  here is part of the header file.

                  public ref class DataEvent16
                  {
                  private:
                  System::UInt16 ^ _Event;

                  public:
                      DataEvent16(System::UInt16 ^ Event);
                      DataEvent16();
                      property System::UInt16 RawData
                      {
                          System::UInt16 get();
                          void set ( System::UInt16 value);
                      }
                      property System::UInt16 IsSet
                      {
                          System::UInt16  get();
                      }
                      property System::Boolean IsActive
                      {
                          System::Boolean get();
                      }
                  

                  };

                  Implementation file

                  DataEvent16::vDataEvent16(System::UInt16 ^ Event)
                  {
                  _Event = Event;
                  }
                  DataEvent16::vDataEvent16()
                  {
                  _Event = gcnew System::UInt16(0);
                  }
                  System::Boolean vDataEvent16::IsActive::get()
                  {
                  System::Boolean data = (System::Boolean)(((* _Event) & 0x02) != 0);
                  return data;
                  }

                  this will compile but explode. on the boolean statement. I know it seems like overkill but I have tried several iterations. :)

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mark Salsbery
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  BTW thanks for providing code to test with :) What does the calling code look like?

                  Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mark Salsbery

                    BTW thanks for providing code to test with :) What does the calling code look like?

                    Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    peterdrozd
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    fixed it. I had to remove all references for that data. The problem was that I have some arguments that have to be passed as references. I have others that have to be passed as value types. the _Event is a value type. I was passing it in as a reference so in that function, I was referencing the pointer I think. So it would compile but the value was probably greater than max value. I guess this all came about because I have become accustomed to coding inline classes and not removing the class definition from the implementation. there are not too many good examples online that I found on how to do it right. thanks everyone for your help. -Peter :cool:

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P peterdrozd

                      fixed it. I had to remove all references for that data. The problem was that I have some arguments that have to be passed as references. I have others that have to be passed as value types. the _Event is a value type. I was passing it in as a reference so in that function, I was referencing the pointer I think. So it would compile but the value was probably greater than max value. I guess this all came about because I have become accustomed to coding inline classes and not removing the class definition from the implementation. there are not too many good examples online that I found on how to do it right. thanks everyone for your help. -Peter :cool:

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mark Salsbery
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      That's what I figured - I just wasn't sure why the C# side didn't complain about a mismatched argument. :) Cheers, Mark

                      Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups