So how well can you see colours?

[Michel Wassink]

I got 8 :) I thought my eyes were worse

Michel Wassink

---

We must make user friendly software. Where are friendly users?

[Gary Wheeler]

37. Unfortunately, test results are probably skewed based upon your monitor, video adapter, and any color management provided by your video driver. I'm still using a pair of 21" CRT's here at work, and neither one is in particularly great shape. I'll have to try this again tonight at home, where I've got a much nicer LCD.

Software Zen: delete this;

[Gary Wheeler]

Phil Uribe wrote:

unless your monitor is really screwy it shuoldn't matter that much how well calibrated or true to "real life" it is

Most emphatically not true. Talk to a human factors engineer about color perception some time. Also talk to anyone who works in high-end video production or desktop publishing. A given combination of monitor, video adapter, and video driver settings produces a color response curve. Many of the standard HTML color encodings either can not be distinguished or are displayed incorrectly depending upon these considerations.

Software Zen: delete this;

[Gary Wheeler]

Doubtful. LCD's surpassed CRT's in color range a long time ago.

Software Zen: delete this;

[francoisdotnet]

3! yoohoo :cool: One's monitor must surely have an affect too .. I have a ATI Mobility Radeon X600 on my HP 15.4" Widescreen NB?

[Steve Dubyo]

Good game that. I scored 4.

;-]

[MatthysDT]

11 for me :cool:

Doggy treat[^]

[Deflinek]

I got 8, but my eyes are going to explode :wtf: :omg:

-- "My software never has bugs. It just develops random features."

[Mustafa Ismail Mustafa]

35

Don't forget to vote if the response was helpful

---

Sig history "dad" Ishmail-Samuel Mustafa "There's no point questioning the actions of a c0ck-juggling thunderc*nt" From the book of testy commentary by martin_hughes Unix is a Four Letter Word, and Vi is a Two Letter Abbreviation

[realJSOP]

I didn't move anything, and simply hit the submit button - I scored 980.

"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

[ed welch]

I got twelve, but the test takes too long so I rushed the last two strips. This makes a good waste of thime at work. Thanks ;)

[Sathesh Sakthivel]

Great good job.

SSK. Anyone who says sunshine brings happiness has never danced in the rain.

[Graham Shanks]

11 - but "Highest score for your gender and age range: 1462" - somebody must be trying hard to maximise their score :rolleyes:

Graham Librarians rule, Ook!

[Lost User]

Monitor calibration will play a large part in this.

Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

[wout de zeeuw]

Huh, mine was perfect! (no kidding!) :doh: And my monitor is not too fancy, cheapest 24" from Samsung: syncmaster 245b, but I guess still good for colors.

Wout

[Zhat]

Hehehe, took about a minute...actually scored 0! Perfect score, not bad for an old man.

[ednrg]

Great find. Thanks!!! I got a 51% on my horrible work monitor.

[Pawel Krakowiak]

16. My eyes are bleeding. :P I was a little afraid because a couple of years ago I visited a doctor and I failed a test or two on color recognition which scared me a little, but she said it was in the error margin, although while performing the test I got an impression she was surprised I didn't see that number among the colorful balls...

[Boro_Bob]

14 for me. Not too bad.

Words fade as the meanings change, but somehow, it don't bother me.

[c2423]

I got 29 - not bad considering I'm green deficient! Chris