Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. This is just for the laugh of it.

This is just for the laugh of it.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
regexcsharp
27 Posts 14 Posters 24 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    adamsappel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi. Background: Co-Worker, (Female <- not biased, just stating the fact), Qualification: Architect... (btw, this is all C# VS2008 code, I swear) Ok, one for the count:

    public static bool NameExists (string name)
    {
    bool exists = false;
    int i = 0;
    while ((i < someListContainingNames.Count) && (exists == false))
    {
    if (someListContainingNames[i] == filename)
    {
    exists = true;
    }
    i++;
    }
    return exists;
    }

    Please see if you can read this... (Original code kept):

            else if (   ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true))
                     && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true))
                     ) 
            {
               if (  ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) 
                  && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false)
                  ) 
               {
                  if (canCopy.DoCopy == true)
                  {
    

    Spot the redundency (Regex's left out):

         string str = "";
         string str2 = "";
         Regex regex1 = new Regex(regex1String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
         Regex regex2 = new Regex(regex2String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
         Regex regex3 = new Regex(regex3String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
         Regex regex4 = new Regex(regex4String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
    
         if (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
         {
            str = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
            str2 = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
         }
         else if (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
         {
            str = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
            str2 = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
         }
         else if (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
         {
            str = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
            str2 = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
         }
         else if (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
         {
            str = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
            str2 = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
         }
         else
         {
            str = "";
            str2 = "";
         }
    
         if (  (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
            || (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
            || (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
            || (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
            )
    
    C D P M C 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A adamsappel

      Hi. Background: Co-Worker, (Female <- not biased, just stating the fact), Qualification: Architect... (btw, this is all C# VS2008 code, I swear) Ok, one for the count:

      public static bool NameExists (string name)
      {
      bool exists = false;
      int i = 0;
      while ((i < someListContainingNames.Count) && (exists == false))
      {
      if (someListContainingNames[i] == filename)
      {
      exists = true;
      }
      i++;
      }
      return exists;
      }

      Please see if you can read this... (Original code kept):

              else if (   ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true))
                       && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true))
                       ) 
              {
                 if (  ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) 
                    && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false)
                    ) 
                 {
                    if (canCopy.DoCopy == true)
                    {
      

      Spot the redundency (Regex's left out):

           string str = "";
           string str2 = "";
           Regex regex1 = new Regex(regex1String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
           Regex regex2 = new Regex(regex2String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
           Regex regex3 = new Regex(regex3String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
           Regex regex4 = new Regex(regex4String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
      
           if (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
           {
              str = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
              str2 = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
           }
           else if (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
           {
              str = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
              str2 = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
           }
           else if (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
           {
              str = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
              str2 = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
           }
           else if (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
           {
              str = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
              str2 = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
           }
           else
           {
              str = "";
              str2 = "";
           }
      
           if (  (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
              || (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
              || (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
              || (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
              )
      
      C Offline
      C Offline
      CPallini
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      No surprise: Architects are supposed to design buildings... :-D

      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
      [My articles]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A adamsappel

        Hi. Background: Co-Worker, (Female <- not biased, just stating the fact), Qualification: Architect... (btw, this is all C# VS2008 code, I swear) Ok, one for the count:

        public static bool NameExists (string name)
        {
        bool exists = false;
        int i = 0;
        while ((i < someListContainingNames.Count) && (exists == false))
        {
        if (someListContainingNames[i] == filename)
        {
        exists = true;
        }
        i++;
        }
        return exists;
        }

        Please see if you can read this... (Original code kept):

                else if (   ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true))
                         && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true))
                         ) 
                {
                   if (  ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) 
                      && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false)
                      ) 
                   {
                      if (canCopy.DoCopy == true)
                      {
        

        Spot the redundency (Regex's left out):

             string str = "";
             string str2 = "";
             Regex regex1 = new Regex(regex1String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
             Regex regex2 = new Regex(regex2String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
             Regex regex3 = new Regex(regex3String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
             Regex regex4 = new Regex(regex4String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
        
             if (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
             {
                str = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                str2 = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
             }
             else if (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
             {
                str = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                str2 = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
             }
             else if (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
             {
                str = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                str2 = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
             }
             else if (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
             {
                str = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                str2 = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
             }
             else
             {
                str = "";
                str2 = "";
             }
        
             if (  (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
                || (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
                || (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
                || (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
                )
        
        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        adamsappel wrote:

        Female <- not biased, just stating the fact

        Then why did you mention it? :mad:

        Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

        P M V 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • A adamsappel

          Hi. Background: Co-Worker, (Female <- not biased, just stating the fact), Qualification: Architect... (btw, this is all C# VS2008 code, I swear) Ok, one for the count:

          public static bool NameExists (string name)
          {
          bool exists = false;
          int i = 0;
          while ((i < someListContainingNames.Count) && (exists == false))
          {
          if (someListContainingNames[i] == filename)
          {
          exists = true;
          }
          i++;
          }
          return exists;
          }

          Please see if you can read this... (Original code kept):

                  else if (   ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true))
                           && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true))
                           ) 
                  {
                     if (  ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) 
                        && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false)
                        ) 
                     {
                        if (canCopy.DoCopy == true)
                        {
          

          Spot the redundency (Regex's left out):

               string str = "";
               string str2 = "";
               Regex regex1 = new Regex(regex1String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
               Regex regex2 = new Regex(regex2String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
               Regex regex3 = new Regex(regex3String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
               Regex regex4 = new Regex(regex4String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
          
               if (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
               {
                  str = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                  str2 = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
               }
               else if (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
               {
                  str = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                  str2 = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
               }
               else if (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
               {
                  str = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                  str2 = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
               }
               else if (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
               {
                  str = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                  str2 = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
               }
               else
               {
                  str = "";
                  str2 = "";
               }
          
               if (  (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
                  || (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
                  || (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
                  || (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
                  )
          
          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Conrad
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Not sure about the sql query your colleague wrote. That had to be a joke on a dull Friday afternoon :)

          "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dan Neely

            adamsappel wrote:

            Female <- not biased, just stating the fact

            Then why did you mention it? :mad:

            Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            My thoughts exactly.

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              My thoughts exactly.

              A Offline
              A Offline
              adamsappel
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Why not? If it was worth mentioning that the profession of the "developer" in question is, it's worth mentioning what the sex of the person is. Well done on nitpicking. Feminist pricks.

              J B P 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • A adamsappel

                Why not? If it was worth mentioning that the profession of the "developer" in question is, it's worth mentioning what the sex of the person is. Well done on nitpicking. Feminist pricks.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jamie550
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Race? Age? Country of origin? Religion?

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J jamie550

                  Race? Age? Country of origin? Religion?

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nagy Vilmos
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Race? 100m for people with no sense of direction. Age? middle Country of origin? Current thinking is North Africa, maybe Egypt, then humans slowly migrated across all the land mass. Religion? Helps in the dark pit of night. Does that help?


                  Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A adamsappel

                    Why not? If it was worth mentioning that the profession of the "developer" in question is, it's worth mentioning what the sex of the person is. Well done on nitpicking. Feminist pricks.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Baconbutty
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Rsole

                    I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days :)

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A adamsappel

                      Hi. Background: Co-Worker, (Female <- not biased, just stating the fact), Qualification: Architect... (btw, this is all C# VS2008 code, I swear) Ok, one for the count:

                      public static bool NameExists (string name)
                      {
                      bool exists = false;
                      int i = 0;
                      while ((i < someListContainingNames.Count) && (exists == false))
                      {
                      if (someListContainingNames[i] == filename)
                      {
                      exists = true;
                      }
                      i++;
                      }
                      return exists;
                      }

                      Please see if you can read this... (Original code kept):

                              else if (   ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true))
                                       && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true))
                                       ) 
                              {
                                 if (  ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) 
                                    && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false)
                                    ) 
                                 {
                                    if (canCopy.DoCopy == true)
                                    {
                      

                      Spot the redundency (Regex's left out):

                           string str = "";
                           string str2 = "";
                           Regex regex1 = new Regex(regex1String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                           Regex regex2 = new Regex(regex2String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                           Regex regex3 = new Regex(regex3String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                           Regex regex4 = new Regex(regex4String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                      
                           if (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
                           {
                              str = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                              str2 = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                           }
                           else if (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
                           {
                              str = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                              str2 = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                           }
                           else if (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
                           {
                              str = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                              str2 = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                           }
                           else if (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
                           {
                              str = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                              str2 = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                           }
                           else
                           {
                              str = "";
                              str2 = "";
                           }
                      
                           if (  (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
                              || (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
                              || (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
                              || (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
                              )
                      
                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Malli_S
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      else if ( ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true)) ) { if ( ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) ) { if (canCopy.DoCopy == true) {

                      I'm faint ! :doh:

                      -Malli...! :rose:****

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dan Neely

                        adamsappel wrote:

                        Female <- not biased, just stating the fact

                        Then why did you mention it? :mad:

                        Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Malli_S
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Female <- not biased, just stating the fact

                        One of my (female) colleague accepts the fact that females aren't technically that sound. (I just mentioned her thought, not mine ! ;P )

                        -Malli...! :rose:****

                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Baconbutty

                          Rsole

                          I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days :)

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          adamsappel
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Such a nice quote. Seriously, I feel your pain. :( PS: I'm not an "Rsole" (PPS: is it still 'an' and not 'a' when using illegal abreviations, whilst being a little hipocritical with your quote?)

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Malli_S

                            Female <- not biased, just stating the fact

                            One of my (female) colleague accepts the fact that females aren't technically that sound. (I just mentioned her thought, not mine ! ;P )

                            -Malli...! :rose:****

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            adamsappel
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Not saying females aren't technically sound, just saying their track record isn't exactly up to scratch, which is kind of contradicting myself, so ignore my first statement... :)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A adamsappel

                              Such a nice quote. Seriously, I feel your pain. :( PS: I'm not an "Rsole" (PPS: is it still 'an' and not 'a' when using illegal abreviations, whilst being a little hipocritical with your quote?)

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              cpkilekofp
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              adamsappel wrote:

                              PS: I'm not an "Rsole"

                              What, exactly, is an Rsole?? :confused:

                              P 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A adamsappel

                                Hi. Background: Co-Worker, (Female <- not biased, just stating the fact), Qualification: Architect... (btw, this is all C# VS2008 code, I swear) Ok, one for the count:

                                public static bool NameExists (string name)
                                {
                                bool exists = false;
                                int i = 0;
                                while ((i < someListContainingNames.Count) && (exists == false))
                                {
                                if (someListContainingNames[i] == filename)
                                {
                                exists = true;
                                }
                                i++;
                                }
                                return exists;
                                }

                                Please see if you can read this... (Original code kept):

                                        else if (   ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true))
                                                 && ((staysTheSameEXEDLL == false) || (EXEDLLPathExistsSoCanProcess == true))
                                                 ) 
                                        {
                                           if (  ((isEXEDLL == true) || (isEXEConfig == true)) 
                                              && (staysTheSameEXEDLL == false)
                                              ) 
                                           {
                                              if (canCopy.DoCopy == true)
                                              {
                                

                                Spot the redundency (Regex's left out):

                                     string str = "";
                                     string str2 = "";
                                     Regex regex1 = new Regex(regex1String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                                     Regex regex2 = new Regex(regex2String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                                     Regex regex3 = new Regex(regex3String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                                     Regex regex4 = new Regex(regex4String, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
                                
                                     if (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
                                     {
                                        str = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                        str2 = regex1.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                     }
                                     else if (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
                                     {
                                        str = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                        str2 = regex2.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                     }
                                     else if (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
                                     {
                                        str = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                        str2 = regex3.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                     }
                                     else if (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
                                     {
                                        str = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["code"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                        str2 = regex4.Match(filename).Groups\["type"\].Value.ToUpper();
                                     }
                                     else
                                     {
                                        str = "";
                                        str2 = "";
                                     }
                                
                                     if (  (regex1.IsMatch(filename))
                                        || (regex2.IsMatch(filename))
                                        || (regex3.IsMatch(filename))
                                        || (regex4.IsMatch(filename))
                                        )
                                
                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                cpkilekofp
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                I have a couple of apps that I maintain (originally written by, yes, a female, human as well, and an entry-level developer) who constantly checked for (boolean_value = true). :doh:

                                V 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C cpkilekofp

                                  adamsappel wrote:

                                  PS: I'm not an "Rsole"

                                  What, exactly, is an Rsole?? :confused:

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  Pete OHanlon
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Say the first letter on it's own.

                                  Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                  My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                                  P C 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A adamsappel

                                    Why not? If it was worth mentioning that the profession of the "developer" in question is, it's worth mentioning what the sex of the person is. Well done on nitpicking. Feminist pricks.

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Pete OHanlon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    adamsappel wrote:

                                    it's worth mentioning what the sex of the person is

                                    Why? It doesn't have any bearing on the code.

                                    adamsappel wrote:

                                    If it was worth mentioning that the profession of the "developer" in question is

                                    That has a bearing on the code. The sex of the person doesn't.

                                    adamsappel wrote:

                                    Feminist pricks.

                                    You're just being a bigotted sexist pig, and people are rightly offended by such an obnoxious attitude.

                                    Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                    My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                                    P A 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Pete OHanlon

                                      Say the first letter on it's own.

                                      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      Paul Conrad
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Jeez, is that the letter 'a'? :laugh:

                                      "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Pete OHanlon

                                        adamsappel wrote:

                                        it's worth mentioning what the sex of the person is

                                        Why? It doesn't have any bearing on the code.

                                        adamsappel wrote:

                                        If it was worth mentioning that the profession of the "developer" in question is

                                        That has a bearing on the code. The sex of the person doesn't.

                                        adamsappel wrote:

                                        Feminist pricks.

                                        You're just being a bigotted sexist pig, and people are rightly offended by such an obnoxious attitude.

                                        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                        My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Paul Conrad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        I agree. The quality of the code written does not have any real relation to the gender of the individual. It is more of the individual and the background, training, mentoring that they have received when learning to code.

                                        "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P Pete OHanlon

                                          Say the first letter on it's own.

                                          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                                          My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          cpkilekofp
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

                                          Say the first letter on it's own.

                                          oK :laugh:

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups