Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Wowser!

Wowser!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpcomjsonlearning
33 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D DaveX86

    "Version 1.0 of the downloable code was..." I hope he didn't do the web page :) Thanks for the link, Roger...I'll check it out. I had one of his 'Undocumented Windows' books back in the Windows 3.1 days...he's pretty good.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Ravi Bhavnani
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    At least it's free. :) Aside: The Indigo Girl's "Learning WCF" book (O'Reilly) has several grammatical errors in the first few pages ("principle" "principal" used instead of "principal" "principle"), but is nevertheless an excellent read. /ravi

    My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

    modified on Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:00 PM

    D J 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Ravi Bhavnani

      At least it's free. :) Aside: The Indigo Girl's "Learning WCF" book (O'Reilly) has several grammatical errors in the first few pages ("principle" "principal" used instead of "principal" "principle"), but is nevertheless an excellent read. /ravi

      My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

      modified on Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:00 PM

      D Offline
      D Offline
      DaveX86
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      Yeah, can't beat free :) I've only just started digging into WCF, though I'll probably stick with what I can find online. If I do break down and get a book, I'll look for that one.

      R K 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • D DaveX86

        Yeah, can't beat free :) I've only just started digging into WCF, though I'll probably stick with what I can find online. If I do break down and get a book, I'll look for that one.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Ravi Bhavnani
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        If you're happy with what's online (there's a lot of good stuff on WCF), you may want to instead invest in Programming WCF Services[^] by Juval Lowy. It kicks it up a notch and is worthwhile reference. You don't need to read it cover-to-cover, just the parts that interest you. /ravi

        My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Ravi Bhavnani

          If you're happy with what's online (there's a lot of good stuff on WCF), you may want to instead invest in Programming WCF Services[^] by Juval Lowy. It kicks it up a notch and is worthwhile reference. You don't need to read it cover-to-cover, just the parts that interest you. /ravi

          My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

          D Offline
          D Offline
          DaveX86
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          I floundered around with it for a few days before I got my very first service to work under IIS, but I got there. It's kind've like the more you think about it, the worse you screw it up :) If I do get a book, I'd rather have an intermediate/advanced one that I can keep using for a long time rather than a beginner one that's only good for a couple of weeks. That one looks pretty good...thanks for the recommedation :beer:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Ravi Bhavnani

            At least it's free. :) Aside: The Indigo Girl's "Learning WCF" book (O'Reilly) has several grammatical errors in the first few pages ("principle" "principal" used instead of "principal" "principle"), but is nevertheless an excellent read. /ravi

            My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

            modified on Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:00 PM

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jono Stewart
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            Heh, this is why you won't be writing any computer books too soon ;) Principle is used correctly... You are right though! It is an excellent read!

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jono Stewart

              Heh, this is why you won't be writing any computer books too soon ;) Principle is used correctly... You are right though! It is an excellent read!

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Ravi Bhavnani
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              c0ward wrote:

              Principle is used correctly...

              No it's not.  I made a mistake in my original post (corrected).  See the 2nd sentence of the 2nd para on page 2 and tell me if "principal" (and its plural) is used correctly.

              c0ward wrote:

              Heh, this is why you won't be writing any computer books too soon

              You're right - I won't.  But I doubt it'll be because of poor grammar. :) /ravi

              My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

              J 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • R Ravi Bhavnani

                c0ward wrote:

                Principle is used correctly...

                No it's not.  I made a mistake in my original post (corrected).  See the 2nd sentence of the 2nd para on page 2 and tell me if "principal" (and its plural) is used correctly.

                c0ward wrote:

                Heh, this is why you won't be writing any computer books too soon

                You're right - I won't.  But I doubt it'll be because of poor grammar. :) /ravi

                My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jono Stewart
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                Ravi Bhavnani wrote:

                No it's not. I made a mistake in my original post (corrected). See the 2nd sentence of the 2nd para on page 2 and tell me if "principal" (and its plural) is used correctly.

                Heh, yup - it is used absolutely correctly :) Maybe you Canadians (flame on!) are a little odd. Haha! Nah - but it could be a language quirk - it wouldn't surprise me any if you guys in the far north used Principal *cough* incorrectly *cough* :doh: At least you put a 'u' in colour :P

                Ravi Bhavnani wrote:

                You're right - I won't. But I doubt it'll be because of poor grammar.

                Sounds like the exact same reason I never will!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Ravi Bhavnani

                  c0ward wrote:

                  Principle is used correctly...

                  No it's not.  I made a mistake in my original post (corrected).  See the 2nd sentence of the 2nd para on page 2 and tell me if "principal" (and its plural) is used correctly.

                  c0ward wrote:

                  Heh, this is why you won't be writing any computer books too soon

                  You're right - I won't.  But I doubt it'll be because of poor grammar. :) /ravi

                  My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jono Stewart
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  Haha I just had another look, and the version I was looking at correctly uses 'principle' :P Obviously she saw the problem and sorted it, so yes, your corrected first post is indeed correct and I shall no longer mock Canadians ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D DaveX86

                    Yeah, can't beat free :) I've only just started digging into WCF, though I'll probably stick with what I can find online. If I do break down and get a book, I'll look for that one.

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    Kevin McFarlane
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    David Lockwood wrote:

                    I'll probably stick with what I can find online

                    The first chapter of Learning WCF is online and is very good (Google "Hello Indigo"). You can also download her samples in either VS 2005 or VS 2008 format and work though the labs just for that chapter. It's surprising how much you learn just from that. I have the Programming WCF Services and it's more advanced but much less readable. Incidentally, despite the title, Learning WCF is not equivalent to Beginning WCF and is pretty in-depth.

                    Kevin

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Kevin McFarlane

                      David Lockwood wrote:

                      I'll probably stick with what I can find online

                      The first chapter of Learning WCF is online and is very good (Google "Hello Indigo"). You can also download her samples in either VS 2005 or VS 2008 format and work though the labs just for that chapter. It's surprising how much you learn just from that. I have the Programming WCF Services and it's more advanced but much less readable. Incidentally, despite the title, Learning WCF is not equivalent to Beginning WCF and is pretty in-depth.

                      Kevin

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DaveX86
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      Thanks Kevin...I'll do that :)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups