GREAT NEWS ABOUT KAYLEEE !!!!!
-
Roger Wright wrote:
I used to shovel the driveway armed with nothing but a pair of shorts and a bottle of tequila. Brrrr.... No way I could do that today.
That;s one of the reasons we reproduce - so our sons can take over shoveling and mowing the lawn while we give the tequila the attention it deserved and never got while we were holding implements in our hands.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Excellent points! :-D
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
Come on, own up. Current rating 1.3 out of 8 votes. That means Daro has a fan. Or has been self-voting again.
-
StupidFilter. That's fascinating. That site leads to a Wikipedia article about "Eternal September[^]". That article, in and of itself, is quite amazing. It's a form of virtual experiment that seems to demonstrate that a lack of enculturation results in anarchy andstupidity. An absence of social taboos almost grants idiocy free reign. Wow. I think that idea is applicable in a broad sense.
73Zeppelin wrote:
It's a form of virtual experiment that seems to demonstrate that a lack of enculturation results in anarchy and stupidity.
I remember the period well. There were AOLers who thought that Usenet was a service provided by and under the control of AOL. In one famous case, an AOLer was flamed and responded by threatening to report the flamer to Steve Case. However, they were slowly but surely becoming acclimatized to the wild and woolly world of Usenet, last I looked. However, I do not remember Usenet, ever, being anything but anarchic and often quite rough. alt.flame and it's many offspring - 1005 according to my newsreader - were celebrated for cruelty and insults. The days when it might have been a gentile and orderly environment disappeared when students were offered access to something that only professors had been using. When ads started appearing in newsgroups [^](April 12, 1994) the end was in sight and as modem speeds picked up and binaries of porn, much of it perverted, began being shared via groups devoted to that purpose, Usenet became an unhealthy place to vist.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Jon, I'm not sure it could be him. This Dato person has apparently been a member since March 02 and in a Nov 02 posting comments he has 6 years programming experience. I rather suspect that it is not CSS as CSS, I feel, is probably not old enough - late teens/early 20's ? But then, its hard to tell. :~
-
Jon, I'm not sure it could be him. This Dato person has apparently been a member since March 02 and in a Nov 02 posting comments he has 6 years programming experience. I rather suspect that it is not CSS as CSS, I feel, is probably not old enough - late teens/early 20's ? But then, its hard to tell. :~
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Nov 02 posting comments he has 6 years programming experience
But this assumes that he's telling the truth. Something I have never felt was high on Heinze's list of priorities.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
I think CP should add user definable filtering. I should be able to say 'never show me posts by that deluded tosser, Dato, again'. And, once you have the functionality built in, admins can add people to it by default. that would be cool. He'd be posting and no-one would ever see his posts, and he'd have no idea why no-one ever replied.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
And the soapbox would soon become so boring no one would post here at all. [edit] actually, I have no objection at all to the kind of filtering feature that you propose, since it affects only what you might see, and is entirely under your control. I seriously doubt that it would result in driving the CSS's or Datos' or Ilions away, for there would always be some who either chose to not use the filtering, or who occasionally chose to slum. That alone would provide sufficient support to keep these around - they don't require much. I do object to vigilante tools like the current N 1-votes and you're gone garbage, simply because I resent others choosing what I can or can't see without my participation or permission. The site owners have such a right, which they need in order to protect themselves from liability caused by careless or intentionally harmful fools, but the rest of us don't. If some forums were to become moderated, and the moderators selected by site management, that would also be fine (provided it were made clear that the forums were moderated, and what the rules were). [/edit]
modified on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:07 AM
-
Roger Wright wrote:
I used to shovel the driveway armed with nothing but a pair of shorts and a bottle of tequila. Brrrr.... No way I could do that today.
That;s one of the reasons we reproduce - so our sons can take over shoveling and mowing the lawn while we give the tequila the attention it deserved and never got while we were holding implements in our hands.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
I'm an equal opportunity type. The daughters can shovel as well.
-
I think CP should add user definable filtering. I should be able to say 'never show me posts by that deluded tosser, Dato, again'. And, once you have the functionality built in, admins can add people to it by default. that would be cool. He'd be posting and no-one would ever see his posts, and he'd have no idea why no-one ever replied.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
I requested a similar feature about a month ago. The option to have all threads or branches started by a user be displayed collapsed by default. That way their crap doesn't clutter the forums but you can still have a look if you want. Of course it would only be a small step on to include total filtering which removes all traces for all eternity :D heh though I'm sure similar such features have been requested for years now.
-
I think CP should add user definable filtering. I should be able to say 'never show me posts by that deluded tosser, Dato, again'. And, once you have the functionality built in, admins can add people to it by default. that would be cool. He'd be posting and no-one would ever see his posts, and he'd have no idea why no-one ever replied.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
Christian Graus wrote:
I think CP should add user definable filtering. I should be able to say 'never show me posts by that deluded tosser, Dato, again'. And, once you have the functionality built in, admins can add people to it by default. that would be cool. He'd be posting and no-one would ever see his posts, and he'd have no idea why no-one ever replied.
;) My CP already has it![^] If you want to remove the whole thread started by an idiot just add one or two "parentNode" to the line:
trollPost = thisTD.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode
Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.
-
And the soapbox would soon become so boring no one would post here at all. [edit] actually, I have no objection at all to the kind of filtering feature that you propose, since it affects only what you might see, and is entirely under your control. I seriously doubt that it would result in driving the CSS's or Datos' or Ilions away, for there would always be some who either chose to not use the filtering, or who occasionally chose to slum. That alone would provide sufficient support to keep these around - they don't require much. I do object to vigilante tools like the current N 1-votes and you're gone garbage, simply because I resent others choosing what I can or can't see without my participation or permission. The site owners have such a right, which they need in order to protect themselves from liability caused by careless or intentionally harmful fools, but the rest of us don't. If some forums were to become moderated, and the moderators selected by site management, that would also be fine (provided it were made clear that the forums were moderated, and what the rules were). [/edit]
modified on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:07 AM
The post deleting stuff was added because of people like CSS and the sort of drivel he used to incessantly post. It was a way to move beyond admins having to watch all the time to remove posts that frankly, could cause CP legal issues if nothing else. And, it's never my intention to ban people if it's avoidable. I think just letting me decide there are people I don't want to see, is a fair solution for exactly the reasons you say.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Nov 02 posting comments he has 6 years programming experience
But this assumes that he's telling the truth. Something I have never felt was high on Heinze's list of priorities.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface