Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Source control recs

Source control recs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpc++collaborationquestion
28 Posts 16 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Here is the situation: A small group of devs (3) have been maintaining a couple of small C++ apps and one large-ish VB6 desktop app for several years using no source control system. They have been tasked with a complete re-write of the VB app with major additions to the product. It remains a desktop app. They will likely use VS2005 or VS2008 and code in C#. Also the team will likely expand to 5 or 6. The company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support". They cannot be reasoned with. What do you folks recommend for a reasonably priced, well supported and well rounded solution for source / revision control? TIA

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jim Crafton
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Like the others mention, subversion is probably your best bet for a group this size. I have heard good things about Perforce as well. An alternate solution: 1) Get the subversion source and build it at home. 2) Change the name, icons, bitmaps in the source to something like "MilliKun Team Enterprise Source Server, from MillKun Inc.". 3) Then create a webpage (use your google mail account for this) for MillKun Inc, and list your "products". Make sure to charge somewhere north of $10,000 for Enterprise Platimnum Level Support. 4) Add a PayPal link so you can charge money. 5) PROFIT!!!

    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jim Crafton

      Like the others mention, subversion is probably your best bet for a group this size. I have heard good things about Perforce as well. An alternate solution: 1) Get the subversion source and build it at home. 2) Change the name, icons, bitmaps in the source to something like "MilliKun Team Enterprise Source Server, from MillKun Inc.". 3) Then create a webpage (use your google mail account for this) for MillKun Inc, and list your "products". Make sure to charge somewhere north of $10,000 for Enterprise Platimnum Level Support. 4) Add a PayPal link so you can charge money. 5) PROFIT!!!

      ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

      C Offline
      C Offline
      charlieg
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      As sad as Jim's suggestion is... there is some merit to it. :)

      Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Hurtling toward a government of the stupid, by the stupid, for the stupid we go. —Michelle Malkin

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Here is the situation: A small group of devs (3) have been maintaining a couple of small C++ apps and one large-ish VB6 desktop app for several years using no source control system. They have been tasked with a complete re-write of the VB app with major additions to the product. It remains a desktop app. They will likely use VS2005 or VS2008 and code in C#. Also the team will likely expand to 5 or 6. The company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support". They cannot be reasoned with. What do you folks recommend for a reasonably priced, well supported and well rounded solution for source / revision control? TIA

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Joe Woodbury
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        We just purchased Surround SCM from Seapine. When doing the eval, I was also very impressed with Accurev. If they have MSDN Team Suite they could just use team server.

        Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T TheIdleProgrammer

          I know you said no open source but... ...your IT guys need to get clued up. Subversion is by far the best source control system around and in the years that we've been using it we've never needed any support. There's more than enough online documentation for most issues and the excellent usability/stability/features make it the number one choice in my opinion. Fight for it, you won't regret it!

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Joe Woodbury
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          I totally disagree. When doing an extensive review, Subversion failed miserably. At one point, we ended up with a corrupt source tree. One engineer using it lost history out of blue. It has other problems as well with tracking ownership of files.

          Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

          J T 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C charlieg

            As sad as Jim's suggestion is... there is some merit to it. :)

            Charlie Gilley Will program for food... Hurtling toward a government of the stupid, by the stupid, for the stupid we go. —Michelle Malkin

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jim Crafton
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Think of the comedic value! And think of the irony if he could use one of his companies machines to act as a web server to host the www.MillKun.com site!

            ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Joe Woodbury

              We just purchased Surround SCM from Seapine. When doing the eval, I was also very impressed with Accurev. If they have MSDN Team Suite they could just use team server.

              Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jim Crafton
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              A number of people here have complained about how byzantine the Team Server/Suite stuff is and how it's pretty flaky.

              ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jim Crafton

                A number of people here have complained about how byzantine the Team Server/Suite stuff is and how it's pretty flaky.

                ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Joe Woodbury
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                My experience as well, which is why we rejected it. However, for pure .NET development and if you already have the Team Suite, it's worth a try (it's certainly not worth paying for otherwise.)

                Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jim Crafton

                  Think of the comedic value! And think of the irony if he could use one of his companies machines to act as a web server to host the www.MillKun.com site!

                  ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Insult - meet injury.

                  Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Here is the situation: A small group of devs (3) have been maintaining a couple of small C++ apps and one large-ish VB6 desktop app for several years using no source control system. They have been tasked with a complete re-write of the VB app with major additions to the product. It remains a desktop app. They will likely use VS2005 or VS2008 and code in C#. Also the team will likely expand to 5 or 6. The company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support". They cannot be reasoned with. What do you folks recommend for a reasonably priced, well supported and well rounded solution for source / revision control? TIA

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    David Crow
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Mike Mullikin wrote:

                    The company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support".

                    And how does that differ from going so many years with no VCS at all?

                    "Love people and use things, not love things and use people." - Unknown

                    "The brick walls are there for a reason...to stop the people who don't want it badly enough." - Randy Pausch

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Interesting... I'll forward the link to the man in charge. Thanks.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jorgen Sigvardsson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      I also recommend the Visual SVN plugin for Visual Studio. It's cheap, and works very well. That together with the free Tortoise SVN client, and you have a very nice setup. The Visual SVN guys also maintain a free server version of Subversion. You don't have to go through the hassle of getting apache to play nicely with subversion. Just install and click a few buttons, and you have a SVN server ready to go. See here http://www.visualsvn.com/[^]

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                        I also recommend the Visual SVN plugin for Visual Studio. It's cheap, and works very well. That together with the free Tortoise SVN client, and you have a very nice setup. The Visual SVN guys also maintain a free server version of Subversion. You don't have to go through the hassle of getting apache to play nicely with subversion. Just install and click a few buttons, and you have a SVN server ready to go. See here http://www.visualsvn.com/[^]

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jon Sagara
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:

                        The Visual SVN guys also maintain a free server version of Subversion. You don't have to go through the hassle of getting apache to play nicely with subversion. Just install and click a few buttons, and you have a SVN server ready to go.

                        It rocks. I use it for my personal projects. Highly recommended. Very easy to use.

                        Jon Sagara Some see the glass as half-empty, some see the glass as half-full. I see the glass as too big. -- George Carlin .NET Blog | Personal Blog | Articles

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Here is the situation: A small group of devs (3) have been maintaining a couple of small C++ apps and one large-ish VB6 desktop app for several years using no source control system. They have been tasked with a complete re-write of the VB app with major additions to the product. It remains a desktop app. They will likely use VS2005 or VS2008 and code in C#. Also the team will likely expand to 5 or 6. The company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support". They cannot be reasoned with. What do you folks recommend for a reasonably priced, well supported and well rounded solution for source / revision control? TIA

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jon Sagara
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Take a look at SourceGear Vault[^].

                          Jon Sagara Some see the glass as half-empty, some see the glass as half-full. I see the glass as too big. -- George Carlin .NET Blog | Personal Blog | Articles

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T TheIdleProgrammer

                            I know you said no open source but... ...your IT guys need to get clued up. Subversion is by far the best source control system around and in the years that we've been using it we've never needed any support. There's more than enough online documentation for most issues and the excellent usability/stability/features make it the number one choice in my opinion. Fight for it, you won't regret it!

                            N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Nemanja Trifunovic
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            C h r i s C h a m b e r s wrote:

                            Subversion is by far the best source control system around

                            Now, that's a slight exagaration. It is not bad, especially for a small team, but far from "the best around".

                            Programming Blog utf8-cpp

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Here is the situation: A small group of devs (3) have been maintaining a couple of small C++ apps and one large-ish VB6 desktop app for several years using no source control system. They have been tasked with a complete re-write of the VB app with major additions to the product. It remains a desktop app. They will likely use VS2005 or VS2008 and code in C#. Also the team will likely expand to 5 or 6. The company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support". They cannot be reasoned with. What do you folks recommend for a reasonably priced, well supported and well rounded solution for source / revision control? TIA

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Marc Clifton
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Mike Mullikin wrote:

                              he company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support".

                              Absurd. As if the support on a commercial product is worth anything. :rolleyes: Marc

                              Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Joe Woodbury

                                I totally disagree. When doing an extensive review, Subversion failed miserably. At one point, we ended up with a corrupt source tree. One engineer using it lost history out of blue. It has other problems as well with tracking ownership of files.

                                Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Joe Woodbury wrote:

                                At one point, we ended up with a corrupt source tree.

                                You didn't set it to use the old database format which should not be used, under any circumstances, on a network share? That combo produces side effects like what you mention. It's also marked in bold and red in the documentation... :)

                                -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Marc Clifton

                                  Mike Mullikin wrote:

                                  he company's IT department is loathe to use free open source software on the servers sighting a fear of "no support".

                                  Absurd. As if the support on a commercial product is worth anything. :rolleyes: Marc

                                  Thyme In The Country Interacx My Blog

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Big Daddy Farang
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Marc Clifton wrote:

                                  As if the support on a commercial product is worth anything.

                                  Well it is the product is from oh, never mind. :doh:

                                  BDF People don't mind being mean; but they never want to be ridiculous. -- Moliere

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jon Sagara

                                    Take a look at SourceGear Vault[^].

                                    Jon Sagara Some see the glass as half-empty, some see the glass as half-full. I see the glass as too big. -- George Carlin .NET Blog | Personal Blog | Articles

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Anton Afanasyev
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Vault is what I would recommend as well. Easy to use, doesn't cost much, and, well....just pretty nice :)

                                    :badger:

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Joe Woodbury

                                      I totally disagree. When doing an extensive review, Subversion failed miserably. At one point, we ended up with a corrupt source tree. One engineer using it lost history out of blue. It has other problems as well with tracking ownership of files.

                                      Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      TheIdleProgrammer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      I can't believe that an extensive review would find that Subversion failed miserably as a version control system. I hate to say it but the problems you saw must have been due to operator error.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups