Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Netbook Coding

Netbook Coding

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
visual-studiocsharpcsstutorial
17 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Expert Coming

    Well I still do have my full-size laptop, and my serious desktop, both have much higher resolutions. I was just worried about it since VS really boxes the real code in, the toolbox on the left(it can hide though), the debugging at the bottom, the properties on the right, and the multiple toolbars at the top. After all that I am not sure what will be left for the code viewport.

    The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

    _ Offline
    _ Offline
    _Damian S_
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I just grab the boxes and stretch them open or closed as I need to... How much code do you really need to see at any one time anyway?

    -------------------------------------------------------- Knowledge is knowing that the tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad!!

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Expert Coming

      Well I still do have my full-size laptop, and my serious desktop, both have much higher resolutions. I was just worried about it since VS really boxes the real code in, the toolbox on the left(it can hide though), the debugging at the bottom, the properties on the right, and the multiple toolbars at the top. After all that I am not sure what will be left for the code viewport.

      The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Can't you use remote debugging?

      Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Luc Pattyn

        you could change your display settings to a lower resolution and find out for yourself how it looks and feels... :)

        Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


        Fixturized forever. :confused:


        E Offline
        E Offline
        Expert Coming
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        I was actually thinking there would be another IDE that was a little better on the user space than VS is. I love VS, but it does take up a ton of space.

        The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Expert Coming

          I just got myself an MSI Wind. It is a netbook, i.e. tiny notebook. It has a max screen resolution of 1024x600. I would like to put Visual Studio on it, but have never used it on a screen less than 1024x768, not sure how it will look. Anyone used VS on a small screen, any suggestions how to get it to look right, have enough of a view on the code, yet easy access to controls, properties ect. I also am open to another IDE, but only if it will surely be better with the small form factor. Thanks for the suggestions ahead of time.

          The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

          C Offline
          C Offline
          ColinM123
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          You might want to look at using the express version, a bit more lightweight.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • _ _Damian S_

            I just grab the boxes and stretch them open or closed as I need to... How much code do you really need to see at any one time anyway?

            -------------------------------------------------------- Knowledge is knowing that the tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad!!

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Expert Coming
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            The way I code I use alot of space, that might be my problem, but I prefer is at is makes it more readable, at least to me. I prefer ifs to be formed like so: if(test) { //Do something } instead of just if(test) //Do something

            The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Expert Coming

              Well I still do have my full-size laptop, and my serious desktop, both have much higher resolutions. I was just worried about it since VS really boxes the real code in, the toolbox on the left(it can hide though), the debugging at the bottom, the properties on the right, and the multiple toolbars at the top. After all that I am not sure what will be left for the code viewport.

              The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mycroft Holmes
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              I have a baby laptop, Compaq, with a 13" screen that I use when travelling (not for work) it is primarily for internet access but I have SQL and VS installed in case I need/want to do some work. It works fine, you spend a lot of time flipping and scrolling but it works. Compile is slow, debug is nasty, chasing through the IDe is painful but it does work.

              Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Expert Coming

                I just got myself an MSI Wind. It is a netbook, i.e. tiny notebook. It has a max screen resolution of 1024x600. I would like to put Visual Studio on it, but have never used it on a screen less than 1024x768, not sure how it will look. Anyone used VS on a small screen, any suggestions how to get it to look right, have enough of a view on the code, yet easy access to controls, properties ect. I also am open to another IDE, but only if it will surely be better with the small form factor. Thanks for the suggestions ahead of time.

                The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Member 96
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                :laugh: Some of us cut our teeth coding on CGA or worse, I think you'll be fine. Of course there are many here who claim they will refuse to get out of bed for less than dual HD monitors...spoiled brats. ;)


                "It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Expert Coming

                  I just got myself an MSI Wind. It is a netbook, i.e. tiny notebook. It has a max screen resolution of 1024x600. I would like to put Visual Studio on it, but have never used it on a screen less than 1024x768, not sure how it will look. Anyone used VS on a small screen, any suggestions how to get it to look right, have enough of a view on the code, yet easy access to controls, properties ect. I also am open to another IDE, but only if it will surely be better with the small form factor. Thanks for the suggestions ahead of time.

                  The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  leppie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  I was ready cash in hand to buy one the other day, then I realized it was not one with a 6cell battery, as advertised... Still looking though...

                  xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                  IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
                  ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L leppie

                    I was ready cash in hand to buy one the other day, then I realized it was not one with a 6cell battery, as advertised... Still looking though...

                    xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                    IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
                    ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    We're looking at the Samsung NC10[^] for the same reason - it has a 7 hour runtime on battery.

                    Anna :rose: Having a bad bug day? Tech Blog | Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

                      We're looking at the Samsung NC10[^] for the same reason - it has a 7 hour runtime on battery.

                      Anna :rose: Having a bad bug day? Tech Blog | Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God"

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      leppie
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Well, if I could find one, I would get it! But only 1 place in South Africa offers it, and a bit expensive too, around R7700. Ah, I just found Lenovo S10 with 3 cell at R5000 :)

                      xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                      IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
                      ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L leppie

                        Well, if I could find one, I would get it! But only 1 place in South Africa offers it, and a bit expensive too, around R7700. Ah, I just found Lenovo S10 with 3 cell at R5000 :)

                        xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support
                        IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - out now!
                        ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dan Neely
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Yeah, the NC10 is more expensive than most netbooks. It's battery pack uses somewhat larger cells than any of the rival 6 cell models, and sammy's also charging a best in breed tax on top of the extra hardware cost. :rolleyes:

                        Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups