Speaking of socialists
-
Oakman wrote:
destroying the standard of living in this country.
One of two things are going to inevitably happen. Either we are going to be drug down to the rest of the world's standard of living, or the rest of the world is going to rise up to our standard of living. There is no other possible long range scenario. The latter can only happen if the entire world adopts a free market, free trade economic system. Any effort to manage the process by anyone, the notion that one nation can exist in some kind of an independent economic bubble or that some sort of tightly controlled centralized authority has any hope of mananaging something as granular and complex as the international economy, will result inevitably in the former.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Do you cut and paste things you wrote earlier or is there a site called capitalismfordunces.com that you get your answers from? Either way, desperately repeating the same mantra when reading the WSJ gives the lie to everything you write, seems, imho, to be a waste of your time.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Oakman wrote:
Then we need a better system.
And God should have created a more perfect planet, but he didn't.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
And God should have created a more perfect planet, but he didn't.
God may or may not have invented the Earth, but, though I hate to destroy your illusions, God did not invent capitalism.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Sorry Stan, but I believe you are wrong in your defence of unregulated financials.
I'm not saying unregulated, I'm saying minimal regulation. There should be laws governing finance just as there are laws governing every other sector of human activity. But government should not regulate or manage business itself. It should clearly define concepts such as 'fraud' and enforce laws pertaining to those concepts.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
I'm saying minimal regulation.
What are your thoughts about "a little bit pregnant?" How about a treatise on "almost a virgin?"
Stan Shannon wrote:
But government should not regulate or manage business itself.
Why not? As long as it it done by representatives of the peepul? You trust these self-same reprepresentatives to manage everyone's bedroom activity - why not their boardroom activity? Seems to me more people get fucked in the boardroom than in the bedroom . .
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Oakman wrote:
silenced by the poqwers-that-be
Money talks, or is it the threat of a visit from a Hitman - after all, "accidents" do happen
Oakman wrote:
Of course, Stan will never understand it, because he refuses to try
No doubt in my mind that Stan will take some persuasion. [joke]Hitman anybody :laugh: [/joke]
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
No doubt in my mind that Stan will take some persuasion
You want I should talk to me brudder, Vito the Bonecrusher from New Joisey?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
And God should have created a more perfect planet, but he didn't.
God may or may not have invented the Earth, but, though I hate to destroy your illusions, God did not invent capitalism.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Sorry Stan, but I believe you are wrong in your defence of unregulated financials.
I'm not saying unregulated, I'm saying minimal regulation. There should be laws governing finance just as there are laws governing every other sector of human activity. But government should not regulate or manage business itself. It should clearly define concepts such as 'fraud' and enforce laws pertaining to those concepts.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
The Reckoning[^] In the past decade, China has invested upward of $1 trillion, mostly earnings from manufacturing exports, into American government bonds and government-backed mortgage debt. That has lowered interest rates and helped fuel a historic consumption binge and housing bubble in the United States. China, some economists say, lulled American consumers, and their leaders, into complacency about their spendthrift ways. Perhaps, Stan, this time it was the Marxists.
-
Oakman wrote:
God did not invent capitalism
Have you told Ilion that :~ You'll upset him :laugh:
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
But government should not regulate or manage business itself.
You want business to police itself. That's like asking prisoners to police themselves. Its an answer but, in my opinion, a non-working answer.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
You want business to police itself.
I never said that. I said business decisions should be business decisions and not influenced in any way at all by political considerations. The government's only legitimate envolvment is when those decisions cross the line into actual criminal activity - thats policing. What you seem to want is not policing, it is fascism - that is, the corporation serving the interests of the state rather than its own business interests.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I'm saying minimal regulation.
What are your thoughts about "a little bit pregnant?" How about a treatise on "almost a virgin?"
Stan Shannon wrote:
But government should not regulate or manage business itself.
Why not? As long as it it done by representatives of the peepul? You trust these self-same reprepresentatives to manage everyone's bedroom activity - why not their boardroom activity? Seems to me more people get fucked in the boardroom than in the bedroom . .
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
Why not? As long as it it done by representatives of the peepul? You trust these self-same reprepresentatives to manage everyone's bedroom activity - why not their boardroom activity? Seems to me more people get f***ed in the boardroom than in the bedroom . .
You have everything just ass backwards, Jon. Society is inherently stable when economics is free and personal behavior is subject of rules and regulations.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
And God should have created a more perfect planet, but he didn't.
God may or may not have invented the Earth, but, though I hate to destroy your illusions, God did not invent capitalism.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
God did not invent capitalism.
No, but just as with the natural world, it works best when left alone. You simply cannot improve upon it. It is as good as it gets.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
The Reckoning[^] In the past decade, China has invested upward of $1 trillion, mostly earnings from manufacturing exports, into American government bonds and government-backed mortgage debt. That has lowered interest rates and helped fuel a historic consumption binge and housing bubble in the United States. China, some economists say, lulled American consumers, and their leaders, into complacency about their spendthrift ways. Perhaps, Stan, this time it was the Marxists.
73Zeppelin wrote:
Perhaps, Stan, this time it was the Marxists.
More accurately the Maoists.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Do you cut and paste things you wrote earlier or is there a site called capitalismfordunces.com that you get your answers from? Either way, desperately repeating the same mantra when reading the WSJ gives the lie to everything you write, seems, imho, to be a waste of your time.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Everything I write is completely valid, Jon. There is no way to isolate the American economy from the rest of the world. It is impossible. There is no way to do it. No one is wise enough to achieve it. Either we are all going to live in free market splendor or we are going to wallow in collectivist squalor. There are no other options.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
You want business to police itself.
I never said that. I said business decisions should be business decisions and not influenced in any way at all by political considerations. The government's only legitimate envolvment is when those decisions cross the line into actual criminal activity - thats policing. What you seem to want is not policing, it is fascism - that is, the corporation serving the interests of the state rather than its own business interests.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
that is, the corporation serving the interests of the state rather than its own business interests.
So what is wrong, exactly, with business serving the country rather than the country serving business?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
Perhaps, Stan, this time it was the Marxists.
More accurately the Maoists.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesJimmyRopes wrote:
More accurately the Maoists.
Actually, I think the Chinese can, these days, be referred to as capitalists par extraordinaire. They are also a dictatorship, of course, and that they inherited from Mao (and a few thousand years of history.)
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Everything I write is completely valid, Jon. There is no way to isolate the American economy from the rest of the world. It is impossible. There is no way to do it. No one is wise enough to achieve it. Either we are all going to live in free market splendor or we are going to wallow in collectivist squalor. There are no other options.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
No one is wise enough to achieve it. Either we are all going to live in free market splendor or we are going to wallow in collectivist squalor.
Yep. Now back in the 70's you would have gone on to explain that the Free Market was going to convert all the Chinese into Republicans, but that doesn't seem to have happened after all. You're as bad as the Global Warming nuts. "Unless things happen according to MY plan, the world will come to an end!" You are as funny as they are, too, but they have done far less to wreck the global economy than the people who agree -- or claim they do - with you. So tell me, Chicken Little, how will the sky start to fall?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
that is, the corporation serving the interests of the state rather than its own business interests.
So what is wrong, exactly, with business serving the country rather than the country serving business?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
with business serving the country rather than the country serving business?
Because business serving the state is precisely what fascims is, or at least one fundamental element of it. I realize that you think you are free as long as you can do what ever you please with your penis, but I can assure you that the ultimately source of all true freedom is free market economics.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
JimmyRopes wrote:
More accurately the Maoists.
Actually, I think the Chinese can, these days, be referred to as capitalists par extraordinaire. They are also a dictatorship, of course, and that they inherited from Mao (and a few thousand years of history.)
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
Oakman wrote:
I think the Chinese can, these days, be referred to as capitalists par extraordinaire.
They can be referred to as "capitalists par extraordinaire" throughout a lot of their history. Go to any large city in the world and you will find a Chinatown because they have traveled the earth to trade for centuries.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes