Weak minded simpleton...

R Giskard Reventlov

Not by a hateful little pustule like you.

R Giskard Reventlov

Not of this sort: it is trivial and risible and is also not very christian: are the beliefs (or otherwise) of others not allowed to be seen? Ar emy beliefs so upsetting to you that you could not even read them without have the strength to understand them without being turned? You give it a rest.

me, me, me

Gary Kirkham

I feel very confident in saying that if someone put the ten commandments on the side of the buses you would be whining. So yeah, give it a rest.

digital man wrote:

it is trivial and risible

Then you have no basis to complain that others might feel the same about your principles.

Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

Lost User

Dalek Dave wrote:

So he is breaking the Human Rights Act by being intolerant to those of an Atheist Disposition.

No. He is a private individual and thus not a representative of any public or private entity.

Dalek Dave

Being a private individual excuses you from obeying the law? I don't think so. And he is a reprentitive of a public or private entity, he is an employee of a Public Transport Company.

------------------------------------ "The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion" Arthur C Clarke

Ilion

digital man wrote:

Not of this sort: it is trivial and risible and is also not very christian: are the beliefs (or otherwise) of others not allowed to be seen? Ar emy beliefs so upsetting to you that you could not even read them without have the strength to understand them without being turned?

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Rob Graham

Regardless of YOUR beliefs, I think the gentleman has as much rights as anyone to protest over his beliefs. By calling him weak-minded, you only reveal your prejudice in the matter. I don't happen to agree with his position either, but think you might be the moron here for disrespecting his right to protest.

R Giskard Reventlov

Gary Kirkham wrote:

I feel very confident in saying that if someone put the ten commandments on the side of the buses you would be whining.

You couldn't be more wrong if you had a masters in wrongness. The written word where it conflicts with my views I find well worth reading and trying to understand. If, having done that, my opinion chnages then all well and good; if not, no harm done. I doubt that there is a written form of words that would rattle my cage suffciently to put me in fear of those words or the meaning behind them.

Gary Kirkham wrote:

Then you have no basis to complain that others might feel the same about your principles.

Well of course I don't: please feel free to take the piss as much as you want (I like a good laugh); I'll certainly take the piss out of you.

me, me, me

Lost User

Actually, the Act gives protection to an individual against public authority. Not giving individual protection against another individual. Thus, the individual also has some responsibilities namely "for the protection of the reputation or rights of others" but failure for the individual to give such undertaking is not a violation of somebody else's rights under Human Rights legislation but maybe prosecuted under some other act. If the employee is deemed a representative of a public or private entity and causes some action contrary to the Human Rights Act then the public or private entity can be prosecuted but not the individual who is the representative of such entity. However, the employee in this particular case is using his rights not to drive a bus which distresses him because of stated articles of Human Rights Act and consequently it is a requirement of the entity to satisfy those rights or face possible prosecution.

Rob Graham

That is the least intelligent and most bigoted remark I have ever seen you post. Sad.

soap brain

I'm unbelievably bored at the moment.

soap brain

Actually, can I take back that I ever said it? It came out a lot worse than I intended.

Lost User

*Elaine calls the Elephant Protection League* :laugh:

Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

Oakman

digital man wrote:

Is his faith so weak that it could be turned by a few words on the side of a bus? Moron.

I find that I can think of things that would force me to take a stand similar to his. Since I'd want to have that right and be respected when I exercised it (whether I could keep my job or not is a different story) I guess I'll have to respect him.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

LOL, I wonder what they would do. :laugh:

Don't forget to vote if the response was helpful

Sig history "dad" Ishmail-Samuel Mustafa "There is no wealth like knowledge, no poverty like ignorance" Ali Ibn Abi Talib

Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote: Keep it up. Fool.

I now think of you as Mr. T! - Trollslayer

Rob Graham

I think you just did...

soap brain

There's more to taking it back than simply deleting the post.

Oakman

Then where is the post admitting you were an ass and begging everyone's pardon? :mad:

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

soap brain

Do I have to? :( .

Zhat

Man, I've got to find a way to stay on here as often as possible...I see lots of response to Idiotman, but all I ever see of his posts are "Message Automatically Removed" :laugh: :laugh: