Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. New Visual Studio built with WPF

New Visual Studio built with WPF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpvisual-studiowpfcomquestion
72 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jim Crafton

    Can anyone confirm or deny this atrocity? http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2008/12/02/visual-studio-today-tomorrow-and-beyond.aspx#9172277[^] Are they really planning on build an IDE with WPF? Am I missing something? Is this just old news that I've missed out on? //edit On further googling, it looks like this is a definite. Seems initially like not such a good idea, but I'll be curious to see how well it works.

    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Shog9 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    FWIW, Rico Mariani is one of the people behind this, so i expect it will at least perform as well as the old editor. I don't necessarily expect it to become fast enough that i'll want to use it for general-purpose text editing, but every little bit helps.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jim Crafton

      Can anyone confirm or deny this atrocity? http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2008/12/02/visual-studio-today-tomorrow-and-beyond.aspx#9172277[^] Are they really planning on build an IDE with WPF? Am I missing something? Is this just old news that I've missed out on? //edit On further googling, it looks like this is a definite. Seems initially like not such a good idea, but I'll be curious to see how well it works.

      ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      There was an outcry b/c there was no WPF code in Vista, and people were speculating that meant MS was not serious about WPF. So, I'd say it's political more than anything. I can't imagine what you'd need WPF for, in a code editor.

      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

      J P R 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        There was an outcry b/c there was no WPF code in Vista, and people were speculating that meant MS was not serious about WPF. So, I'd say it's political more than anything. I can't imagine what you'd need WPF for, in a code editor.

        Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jim Crafton
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        That was my thought too. However the WPF text classes are more sophisticated than what's in WinForms so maybe that was what attracted them. There is the concern over how this renders the text, I know I have seen some things where the text rendering was actually kind of annoying, but maybe that's something that will be fixed as a result of this.

        ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Christian Graus

          There was an outcry b/c there was no WPF code in Vista, and people were speculating that meant MS was not serious about WPF. So, I'd say it's political more than anything. I can't imagine what you'd need WPF for, in a code editor.

          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Pete OHanlon
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          I suspect that virtualisation may play part of this. Also, WPF text documents tend to be a richer more flexible option.

          "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

          My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L l a u r e n

            but but but... it will be shineeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......... :rolleyes: [edit] but do you think this will let them add current line highlight? [/edit]

            "mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Member 96
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            l a u r e n wrote:

            but do you think this will let them add current line highlight?

            Isn't that what that funny blinking vertical bar thingie is for?


            "It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jim Crafton

              Can anyone confirm or deny this atrocity? http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2008/12/02/visual-studio-today-tomorrow-and-beyond.aspx#9172277[^] Are they really planning on build an IDE with WPF? Am I missing something? Is this just old news that I've missed out on? //edit On further googling, it looks like this is a definite. Seems initially like not such a good idea, but I'll be curious to see how well it works.

              ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              How pointless. It's an IDE for gods sake not some piece of crappy shareware that must have fancy graphics to compensate for the fact that it's not useful.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Member 96

                l a u r e n wrote:

                but do you think this will let them add current line highlight?

                Isn't that what that funny blinking vertical bar thingie is for?


                "It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson

                L Offline
                L Offline
                l a u r e n
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                ummmmmmmmmmmm no ... i mean the whole line background color ... you know ... like every other text editor on the planet has :|

                "mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  There was an outcry b/c there was no WPF code in Vista, and people were speculating that meant MS was not serious about WPF. So, I'd say it's political more than anything. I can't imagine what you'd need WPF for, in a code editor.

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rama Krishna Vavilala
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  For a start you can embed a audio/video comment in your code:) That was one of the samples I saw.

                  R D L 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jim Crafton

                    Just for the editor? If so, what's the point?, Rather, what's the big deal, other than pretty text, assuming you don't mind WPF text rendering.

                    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stuart Dootson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    From an interview I saw with Rico Mariani (VS Chief Architect) it's as much about making the ornaments around the text easy to add as displaying the text. Let's be honest - GDI's not really state of the art any more :-) Personally, I've got no problem with them using WPF, so long as it doesn't hurt performance.

                    Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stuart Dootson

                      From an interview I saw with Rico Mariani (VS Chief Architect) it's as much about making the ornaments around the text easy to add as displaying the text. Let's be honest - GDI's not really state of the art any more :-) Personally, I've got no problem with them using WPF, so long as it doesn't hurt performance.

                      Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jim Crafton
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      Stuart Dootson wrote:

                      GDI's not really state of the art any more

                      Too true. This has been the case for about 15 years. I think the thing that is annoying to some, or at least myself, is that a new Text system could have been developed a *long* time ago, and without 20+ Mb DLL dependencies. Just a matter of priorities I suppose.

                      ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stuart Dootson

                        Yes, they're using WPF for the editor. Judging by the CTP, it's not adversely affecting performance - if anything, it's quicker than VS2008, even running in VPC vs VS2008 running native.

                        Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rob Graham
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Stuart Dootson wrote:

                        if anything, it's quicker than VS2008

                        Even a snail on downers would be faster than VS2008.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                          For a start you can embed a audio/video comment in your code:) That was one of the samples I saw.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rob Graham
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          I already see enough idiotic comments without adding that feature. Its a developer tool dammit, not YouTube reborn.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Rob Graham

                            Stuart Dootson wrote:

                            if anything, it's quicker than VS2008

                            Even a snail on downers would be faster than VS2008.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stuart Dootson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            You're not wrong. I'd probably be more accurate comparing its performance with VS2003, which was the last version of VS I found totally acceptable performance-wise.

                            Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jim Crafton

                              Stuart Dootson wrote:

                              GDI's not really state of the art any more

                              Too true. This has been the case for about 15 years. I think the thing that is annoying to some, or at least myself, is that a new Text system could have been developed a *long* time ago, and without 20+ Mb DLL dependencies. Just a matter of priorities I suppose.

                              ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Shog9 0
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              Jim Crafton wrote:

                              Just a matter of priorities I suppose.

                              Yup. Ask for an upgraded GDI, and you get GDI+: half-assed abandonware. Ask for a PDF/Flash competitor, and you get WPF...

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                                For a start you can embed a audio/video comment in your code:) That was one of the samples I saw.

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Dan Neely
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #32

                                Meh. With text comments I can look at something and go "I was an idiot six months ago" in 2 seconds, vs two minutes. NTM 6mo ago I wouldn't've annoyed my coworkers by babbling into a mike..

                                Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L l a u r e n

                                  ummmmmmmmmmmm no ... i mean the whole line background color ... you know ... like every other text editor on the planet has :|

                                  "mostly watching the human race is like watching dogs watch tv ... they see the pictures move but the meaning escapes them"

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Member 96
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #33

                                  ;)


                                  "It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." -Sam Levenson

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jim Crafton

                                    Can anyone confirm or deny this atrocity? http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2008/12/02/visual-studio-today-tomorrow-and-beyond.aspx#9172277[^] Are they really planning on build an IDE with WPF? Am I missing something? Is this just old news that I've missed out on? //edit On further googling, it looks like this is a definite. Seems initially like not such a good idea, but I'll be curious to see how well it works.

                                    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #34

                                    To me that sounds like sheer insanity. Of all the WPF apps I've seen, they all share two attributes, they are as flashy as a pimp on sunset boulevard and they are slow. For MS to decide to do this, unless they've really revamped the underlying engine, is really them saying "take it like a good female doggy" because they're just feeding us crap and it seems like we're taking it.

                                    Don't forget to vote if the response was helpful


                                    Sig history "dad" Ishmail-Samuel Mustafa Unix is a Four Letter Word, and Vi is a Two Letter Abbreviation

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Jim Crafton

                                      Can anyone confirm or deny this atrocity? http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2008/12/02/visual-studio-today-tomorrow-and-beyond.aspx#9172277[^] Are they really planning on build an IDE with WPF? Am I missing something? Is this just old news that I've missed out on? //edit On further googling, it looks like this is a definite. Seems initially like not such a good idea, but I'll be curious to see how well it works.

                                      ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Judah Gabriel Himango
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #35

                                      The folks that know Rico know he's a hardcore performance freak. So a lot of people were surprised to learn the new code editor will be WPF. He responded to questions about this and said in this post[^]: the code editor for VS will be faster, especially on large code files. Also, the IDE will use less memory.

                                      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jim Crafton

                                        Can anyone confirm or deny this atrocity? http://blogs.msdn.com/ricom/archive/2008/12/02/visual-studio-today-tomorrow-and-beyond.aspx#9172277[^] Are they really planning on build an IDE with WPF? Am I missing something? Is this just old news that I've missed out on? //edit On further googling, it looks like this is a definite. Seems initially like not such a good idea, but I'll be curious to see how well it works.

                                        ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog Just Say No to Web 2 Point Oh

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Joe Woodbury
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #36

                                        It should run faster than VS 2008 on systems with very recent video cards. Windows Forms doesn't use the video driver even as well as WPF, let alone regular windows. On the flip side, on just slightly older systems, WPF runs like a pig.

                                        Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

                                          To me that sounds like sheer insanity. Of all the WPF apps I've seen, they all share two attributes, they are as flashy as a pimp on sunset boulevard and they are slow. For MS to decide to do this, unless they've really revamped the underlying engine, is really them saying "take it like a good female doggy" because they're just feeding us crap and it seems like we're taking it.

                                          Don't forget to vote if the response was helpful


                                          Sig history "dad" Ishmail-Samuel Mustafa Unix is a Four Letter Word, and Vi is a Two Letter Abbreviation

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Judah Gabriel Himango
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #37

                                          I've seen some like that. Others, like Blu, feel really fast and snappy. Have you read Rico's answers about why WPF, and how perf will be affected? He's stated in this blog[^] that the WPF-based editor will be faster, especially on large files, than the GDI-based one.

                                          Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                                          K 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups