Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. This is disgusting [modified]

This is disgusting [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
167 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S soap brain

    Why not? Brain damage and drug usage target only the brain, and yet have profound effects on the mind. How can the mind transcend the brain?

    G Offline
    G Offline
    Gary Kirkham
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    I never said that chemistry can't affect the mind, I am not convinced that the "mind is simply the sum of the chemical reactions occurring in your body."

    Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

    S L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S soap brain

      Why not? Brain damage and drug usage target only the brain, and yet have profound effects on the mind. How can the mind transcend the brain?

      K Offline
      K Offline
      kmg365
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      ...you say this as I migrate my OS and development tools from the "brain" of my laptop to the "brain" of my virtual server host. The software has changed brains and has gone to a better place.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Gary Kirkham

        I never said that chemistry can't affect the mind, I am not convinced that the "mind is simply the sum of the chemical reactions occurring in your body."

        Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

        S Offline
        S Offline
        soap brain
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        So what is it? If it's not matter, then why is it so strongly affected by chemicals and yet completely undetectable? If I were to take a clump of neurons and carefully, one by one, wire them together like they are in the brain, at what point do they have a mind?

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K kmg365

          ...you say this as I migrate my OS and development tools from the "brain" of my laptop to the "brain" of my virtual server host. The software has changed brains and has gone to a better place.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          soap brain
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          The hard drives have physically altered their structures. The software doesn't transcend them, it's encoded onto them.

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Gary Kirkham

            I never said that chemistry can't affect the mind, I am not convinced that the "mind is simply the sum of the chemical reactions occurring in your body."

            Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            Gary Kirkham wrote:

            I am not convinced that the "mind is simply the sum of the chemical reactions occurring in your body."

            Just out of curiosity - hypothetically speaking, what evidence would you require to be convinced of this?

            - F

            G S S 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • G Gary Kirkham

              Or that premarital sex leads to dancing. :)

              Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

              M Offline
              M Offline
              MidwestLimey
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              Dancing is yet to be proven, but it has been linked to accelerated marriage plans.

              10110011001111101010101000001000001101001010001010100000100000101000001000111100010110001011001011

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Gary Kirkham wrote:

                I am not convinced that the "mind is simply the sum of the chemical reactions occurring in your body."

                Just out of curiosity - hypothetically speaking, what evidence would you require to be convinced of this?

                - F

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gary Kirkham
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                Whatcha got?

                Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S soap brain

                  The hard drives have physically altered their structures. The software doesn't transcend them, it's encoded onto them.

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kmg365
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  Software thinks it has a physical hard drive, but now it's drives are spiri.... virtual.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S soap brain

                    If only I showed restraint and maturity in deciding which symbols to care about. Like Grilled Cheese Virgin Mary[^], Potato Chip Jesus[^], Fishstick Jesus[^], Rotten Grape Mary[^], Tree Mary[^], Mother Theresa Cinnamon Bun[^], Potato Mary[^], and of course Virgin Mary Cerebellum[^]. If only I wasn't so hung up on the symbolic insignificance of 77,300 scholarly articles [^] on the phenomenon of brain damage causing personality change.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Synaptrik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    I actually have a box with a ship model in it that's pretty old, and has a stain with the immortal face of James Brown on it. I swear it. Now switch your religion to the grandfather of funk.

                    This statement is false

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Gary Kirkham wrote:

                      I am not convinced that the "mind is simply the sum of the chemical reactions occurring in your body."

                      Just out of curiosity - hypothetically speaking, what evidence would you require to be convinced of this?

                      - F

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Synaptrik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      Just out of curiosity, why is it important to manipulate another's beliefs? And yes, that applies to Gary as well.

                      This statement is false

                      L G 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S soap brain

                        Oakman wrote:

                        Only people who think that are ones with little minds, less imagination, and no souls.

                        You surely don't really believe that. I have a fantastic imagination - I can imagine all the different ways that the world isn't, and never will be. Hey, I'm open to the idea of some currently undiscovered interaction between matter and mind-vapour, but it has to make sense. You can't just say that something undetectable exists, is intrinsically tied to clumps of neurons and violates numerous laws of physics by prompting uncountably many nerve impulses, just because. You also can't criticise me because I don't believe you.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Synaptrik
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        Can you prove that you are not really dreaming this experience? Empirically? Leave some mystery to life. Not everything has to have a rational explanation. There's a proverb, Sufi I think, that suggests that if you remove all of the falsities from your reality, you might find yourself left with nothing. Take it as you will.

                        This statement is false

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gary Kirkham

                          Whatcha got?

                          Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          I asked what evidence would be required to convince you. Successful brain transplant? Purposeful personality change by altering brain structure? See, it's my guess that there is absolutely no empirical evidence that anyone could produce that would convince you, and I was just wondering if I was wrong.

                          - F

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Synaptrik

                            Just out of curiosity, why is it important to manipulate another's beliefs? And yes, that applies to Gary as well.

                            This statement is false

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            Because erroneous beliefs have consequences. For (a ridiculous) example, if I believe that I can close my eyes and God will let me drive through oncoming traffic without hitting anyone, that belief needs correction before someone gets hurt or killed.

                            - F

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Synaptrik

                              Just out of curiosity, why is it important to manipulate another's beliefs? And yes, that applies to Gary as well.

                              This statement is false

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              Gary Kirkham
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              Actually I wasn't trying to manipulate anyone, I mearly stated that I wasn't convinced that the mind was only comprised of and/or completely explained by chemistry.

                              Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                I asked what evidence would be required to convince you. Successful brain transplant? Purposeful personality change by altering brain structure? See, it's my guess that there is absolutely no empirical evidence that anyone could produce that would convince you, and I was just wondering if I was wrong.

                                - F

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                Gary Kirkham
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                Fisticuffs wrote:

                                it's my guess that there is absolutely no empirical evidence that anyone could produce that would convince you

                                Sounds familiar.

                                Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                                L S 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Because erroneous beliefs have consequences. For (a ridiculous) example, if I believe that I can close my eyes and God will let me drive through oncoming traffic without hitting anyone, that belief needs correction before someone gets hurt or killed.

                                  - F

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Synaptrik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  Erroneous to whom? The discussion is mind. Not God. And whether it is solely a physical component and whether there can only be physical components. You cannot provide empirical evidence that there is only a physical component to mind. And you cannot provide empirical evidence that a being such as the concept of God represents does not exist. Its a fool's quest.

                                  This statement is false

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G Gary Kirkham

                                    Actually I wasn't trying to manipulate anyone, I mearly stated that I wasn't convinced that the mind was only comprised of and/or completely explained by chemistry.

                                    Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Synaptrik
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    Your sig is.

                                    This statement is false

                                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S soap brain

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      Only people who think that are ones with little minds, less imagination, and no souls.

                                      You surely don't really believe that. I have a fantastic imagination - I can imagine all the different ways that the world isn't, and never will be. Hey, I'm open to the idea of some currently undiscovered interaction between matter and mind-vapour, but it has to make sense. You can't just say that something undetectable exists, is intrinsically tied to clumps of neurons and violates numerous laws of physics by prompting uncountably many nerve impulses, just because. You also can't criticise me because I don't believe you.

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oakman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                      You surely don't really believe that

                                      I believe anyone who thinks they've got it all figured out shows a paucity of imagination.

                                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                      You can't just say that something undetectable exists, is intrinsically tied to clumps of neurons and violates numerous laws of physics by prompting uncountably many nerve impulses, just because

                                      Nor can you say it doesn't, just because. An absence of proof is not an absence of truth.

                                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                      You also can't criticise me because I don't believe you.

                                      I can do anything I want along those lines, but you probably need to take any criticisms I offer, or that anyone else offers, a little less seriously.

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Synaptrik

                                        Your sig is.

                                        This statement is false

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        Gary Kirkham
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        Synaptrik wrote:

                                        Your sig is.

                                        My sig is what?

                                        Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Synaptrik

                                          Erroneous to whom? The discussion is mind. Not God. And whether it is solely a physical component and whether there can only be physical components. You cannot provide empirical evidence that there is only a physical component to mind. And you cannot provide empirical evidence that a being such as the concept of God represents does not exist. Its a fool's quest.

                                          This statement is false

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          Ask a general question, get a general answer. You asked generally about beliefs. Yes, some beliefs are erroneous. A schizophrenic may believe that they are the King of England. This belief is not correct.

                                          Synaptrik wrote:

                                          You cannot provide empirical evidence that there is only a physical component to mind.

                                          I absolutely can, and it's suggested by Ravel's posts - that there are discrete aspects of what we would consider personality affected in a predictable way when that part of the brain is lesioned. That the complexity of the brain is consistent with the complexity of human behaviour. Etc. All of that is certainly empirical evidence. It's nice, however, that because you, from your vast worldly experience, have decreed that the pursuit of a genuine understanding of human behaviour and personality is a 'fool's quest.' I'll give that opinion all due consideration.

                                          - F

                                          S 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups