Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Oracle buys Sun

Oracle buys Sun

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javamysqloraclecomquestion
42 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N NormDroid

    It will be free and completely stripped down, probably rebadged as Oracle 'Lite', then maybe they'll over more versions of Oracle increasing price and features.

    Software Kinetics - Moving software

    D Offline
    D Offline
    devvvy
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    we already have oracle 10g Express and a free M$SQL Express

    dev

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N NormDroid

      Shows you what little I know of Oracle. I've worked with Oracle only once and vowed to use it never again.

      Software Kinetics - Moving software

      D Offline
      D Offline
      devvvy
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      i had problem with it recently discovered it didn't like transaction scope (doc says it does) failed with some "internal error" trying to access memory it isn't supposed to. oracle engineer recommended me to use ODAC BETA version and yet even this version didn't work in the end i resort to go old oConn.BeginTransaction and oTx.Commit/Rollback

      dev

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D devvvy

        why do we want to yet reinvent the wheel once again?

        dev

        N Offline
        N Offline
        NormDroid
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        devvvy wrote:

        why do we want to yet reinvent the wheel once again

        Because that's how the computer industry makes money. Otherwise we'd all stil be using C compilers and developing on legacy systems :~

        Software Kinetics - Moving software

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N NormDroid

          devvvy wrote:

          why do we want to yet reinvent the wheel once again

          Because that's how the computer industry makes money. Otherwise we'd all stil be using C compilers and developing on legacy systems :~

          Software Kinetics - Moving software

          D Offline
          D Offline
          devvvy
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          that's a good thing if you consider how financial industry and real estate makes money out of everyone else - so afterall we should reinvent our wheels!

          dev

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Watson

            Oracle has bought Sun[^]. Probably not so many of us here using Java but this has implications for those of us using MySQL. Seems a better fit than IBM buying Sun though.

            cheers, Paul M. Watson.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Robert Surtees
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            You can look at what they are doing with/to Berkeley DB to get a taste of what might be in store for MySQL. Oracle Berkely DB Product Family[^].

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Watson

              Oracle has bought Sun[^]. Probably not so many of us here using Java but this has implications for those of us using MySQL. Seems a better fit than IBM buying Sun though.

              cheers, Paul M. Watson.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Ray Cassick
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              I am not so sure that I think this is a great idea. I think at first glance people will try to gravitate to what looks like the natural synergy of Oracle (a company heavily leveraged in Java) and SUN (a company that is also obviously heavily involved in Java) but there is a larger component here, the hardware parts, where I think Oracle may have issues. To me this is a clear case of a company getting outside their comfort zone. It can go very well or it can end poorly. I have seen it go both ways, and have been involved in at least one of them (Intel's move into the communications space). Look around and see if you can find any others in the market.. I bet you can. I understand the theory behind synergy and linked product diversification, and it is really hard to look forward in this industry and try to see all the possible outcomes just because the variables are so many, but I just get a bad feeling about this move. I also ask if people would think it was a good idea for Microsoft to buy a hardware company? Do you think that would be successful (keep any anti-ms bias out of it for now).


              LinkedIn[^] | Blog[^] | Twitter[^]

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Ray Cassick

                I am not so sure that I think this is a great idea. I think at first glance people will try to gravitate to what looks like the natural synergy of Oracle (a company heavily leveraged in Java) and SUN (a company that is also obviously heavily involved in Java) but there is a larger component here, the hardware parts, where I think Oracle may have issues. To me this is a clear case of a company getting outside their comfort zone. It can go very well or it can end poorly. I have seen it go both ways, and have been involved in at least one of them (Intel's move into the communications space). Look around and see if you can find any others in the market.. I bet you can. I understand the theory behind synergy and linked product diversification, and it is really hard to look forward in this industry and try to see all the possible outcomes just because the variables are so many, but I just get a bad feeling about this move. I also ask if people would think it was a good idea for Microsoft to buy a hardware company? Do you think that would be successful (keep any anti-ms bias out of it for now).


                LinkedIn[^] | Blog[^] | Twitter[^]

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paul Watson
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Ray Cassick wrote:

                I also ask if people would think it was a good idea for Microsoft to buy a hardware company? Do you think that would be successful

                Best mice and keyboards I ever used were from Microsoft... And who makes the XBox? That works pretty well. Maybe a Microsoft Windows and Microsoft PC strategy could work. Simplify things (price would go up though.) But yeah. I don't see it going well for Sun and Oracle. It is better than IBM + Sun but that isn't saying much.

                cheers, Paul M. Watson.

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D devvvy

                  now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL? MySQL ... function and triggers cannot be recursive temp table cannot be referenced more than once in same query open more than one conn per transaction is not permitted (distrib trans..) ... I thought MySQL is nice in beginning but now thinks its fading away

                  dev

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  devvvy wrote:

                  now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL?

                  Are either open source?

                  D 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    devvvy wrote:

                    now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL?

                    Are either open source?

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    devvvy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    no does that matters (until Express aren't free frankly i don't give a damn)

                    dev

                    L D 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      devvvy wrote:

                      now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL?

                      Are either open source?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      devvvy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      no does that matters (until Express aren't free frankly i don't give a damn)

                      dev

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D devvvy

                        no does that matters (until Express aren't free frankly i don't give a damn)

                        dev

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        devvvy wrote:

                        no does that matters (until Express aren't free frankly i don't give a damn)

                        You're not the only person on the planet. Some of the others do give a damn. Sheesh!

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          devvvy wrote:

                          no does that matters (until Express aren't free frankly i don't give a damn)

                          You're not the only person on the planet. Some of the others do give a damn. Sheesh!

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          devvvy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          sorry I don't give a damn about you too Sheesh :)

                          dev

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Paul Watson

                            Ray Cassick wrote:

                            I also ask if people would think it was a good idea for Microsoft to buy a hardware company? Do you think that would be successful

                            Best mice and keyboards I ever used were from Microsoft... And who makes the XBox? That works pretty well. Maybe a Microsoft Windows and Microsoft PC strategy could work. Simplify things (price would go up though.) But yeah. I don't see it going well for Sun and Oracle. It is better than IBM + Sun but that isn't saying much.

                            cheers, Paul M. Watson.

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Ray Cassick
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            Paul Watson wrote:

                            And who makes the XBox? That works pretty well.

                            Agreed here, but so they make them or OEM them from another vendor?

                            Paul Watson wrote:

                            Best mice and keyboards I ever used were from Microsoft...

                            You have a good point here, but I think that a few of the people that have suffered through the last round of product defects may have a word here :)

                            Paul Watson wrote:

                            Maybe a Microsoft Windows and Microsoft PC strategy could work.

                            I have always said that Windows would be much more stable if it was designed to run on a dedicated hardware environment, free from having to support all the other vendors stuff, but I am not sure if MS is the company to make that hardware.


                            LinkedIn[^] | Blog[^] | Twitter[^]

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P Paul Watson

                              Oracle has bought Sun[^]. Probably not so many of us here using Java but this has implications for those of us using MySQL. Seems a better fit than IBM buying Sun though.

                              cheers, Paul M. Watson.

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              Kevin McFarlane
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              I guessed this might happen after IBM dropped out.

                              Kevin

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Paul Watson

                                Oracle has bought Sun[^]. Probably not so many of us here using Java but this has implications for those of us using MySQL. Seems a better fit than IBM buying Sun though.

                                cheers, Paul M. Watson.

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mike Diack
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                It's not just Java's future that worries me - I hope Oracle will continue to support Virtual Box, which apart from the recent version 2.2.0 fiasco (buggy as hell), has otherwise been growing excellently. Mike

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D devvvy

                                  now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL? MySQL ... function and triggers cannot be recursive temp table cannot be referenced more than once in same query open more than one conn per transaction is not permitted (distrib trans..) ... I thought MySQL is nice in beginning but now thinks its fading away

                                  dev

                                  F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  Fernando A Gomez F
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  devvvy wrote:

                                  now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL?

                                  Because both express versions have several limitations. Example given: your databases can't be longer than 4GB.

                                  Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Fernando A Gomez F

                                    devvvy wrote:

                                    now that Oracle 10g express and M$SQL Express are free, why'd you need MySQL?

                                    Because both express versions have several limitations. Example given: your databases can't be longer than 4GB.

                                    Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    devvvy
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    yes sure, how about function cannot be recursive or no more than one conn can be opened within span of a transaction scope?

                                    dev

                                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D devvvy

                                      no does that matters (until Express aren't free frankly i don't give a damn)

                                      dev

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Dan Neely
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      not to us, but zillions of people have drank that koolaid. :rolleyes:

                                      Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D devvvy

                                        yes sure, how about function cannot be recursive or no more than one conn can be opened within span of a transaction scope?

                                        dev

                                        F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        Fernando A Gomez F
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        That does not change the fact that you can't use express editions if your database will grow higher than 4GB...

                                        Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela

                                        D 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Fernando A Gomez F

                                          That does not change the fact that you can't use express editions if your database will grow higher than 4GB...

                                          Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          devvvy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          yes thinking about it, that's a good point. and with mysql around database there'll always be a database free for all however oracle and M$ decides to price their databases, also keeps database price down since we all need it so much

                                          dev

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups