What a Catastrophe
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
I don't care about the status of the company or their product, Its what Obama said and done along with the rest of the gang.
So if Bush had done the same thing, you'd be all for it?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
I don't care about the status of the company or their product, Its what Obama said and done along with the rest of the gang.
So if Bush had done the same thing, you'd be all for it?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
From the article:
The reports, which GM will neither confirm nor deny, could mean trouble because GM is supported by $15.4 billion in U.S. government loans, largely due to the Obama administration's desire to preserve the company's 90,000 U.S. jobs.
I am not sure to understand, but by doing so, GM would go agains Obama's will to preserver American jobs, isn't it?
-
Liar.
-
Are you being intentionally obtuse? Or, are you happy being apart of the "me too" group of former neocon cheerleaders? Why weren't you bitching about this stuff when it was happening during the previous administrations? Why do you suddenly care? Why aren't you bitching about the layabouts in the midwest who receive public money to not grow crops? Why weren't you complaining when the federal government under the last administration did all it could to curtail states rights (look up CA vs EPA)? Why didn't you care when public money was spent to build stadiums so that a few people could profit and a lot of people could lose their homes and in turn get good minimum wage jobs selling popcorn? But now you and your ilk care? Now the substance is suddenly more important than the symbolism? Why? You and the rest of the republican cheerleaders have completely lost the plot. You've stopped thinking for yourselves, you accept what you are told and you happily, knowingly, partake in doublethink.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
Are you being intentionally obtuse? Or, are you happy being apart of the "me too" group of former neocon cheerleaders? Why weren't you bitching about this stuff when it was happening during the previous administrations? Why do you suddenly care? Why aren't you bitching about the layabouts in the midwest who receive public money to not grow crops? Why weren't you complaining when the federal government under the last administration did all it could to curtail states rights (look up CA vs EPA)? Why didn't you care when public money was spent to build stadiums so that a few people could profit and a lot of people could lose their homes and in turn get good minimum wage jobs selling popcorn? But now you and your ilk care? Now the substance is suddenly more important than the symbolism? Why? You and the rest of the republican cheerleaders have completely lost the plot. You've stopped thinking for yourselves, you accept what you are told and you happily, knowingly, partake in doublethink.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
Chris Austin wrote:
Why weren't you bitching about this stuff when it was happening during the previous administrations? Sometimes I have other things to do you know? You know what I mean jackass?
Chris Austin wrote:
Why aren't you bitching about the layabouts in the midwest who receive public money to not grow crops? Why weren't you complaining .....
Just because I never posted about it that doesn't mean I think its good or insignificant.
Chris Austin wrote:
Now the substance is suddenly more important than the symbolism?
Oh okay symbolism is more important than substance, Riigghtt... :rolleyes:
Chris Austin wrote:
Why?
A trojan horse is a perfect example of why substance is more important than symbolism.
Chris Austin wrote:
You and the rest of the republican cheerleaders have completely lost the plot.
Perhaps I have, perhaps I'm not a republican in a sense, I don't go along with something because it is labeled republican.
-
Chris Austin wrote:
Why weren't you bitching about this stuff when it was happening during the previous administrations? Sometimes I have other things to do you know? You know what I mean jackass?
Chris Austin wrote:
Why aren't you bitching about the layabouts in the midwest who receive public money to not grow crops? Why weren't you complaining .....
Just because I never posted about it that doesn't mean I think its good or insignificant.
Chris Austin wrote:
Now the substance is suddenly more important than the symbolism?
Oh okay symbolism is more important than substance, Riigghtt... :rolleyes:
Chris Austin wrote:
Why?
A trojan horse is a perfect example of why substance is more important than symbolism.
Chris Austin wrote:
You and the rest of the republican cheerleaders have completely lost the plot.
Perhaps I have, perhaps I'm not a republican in a sense, I don't go along with something because it is labeled republican.
Intel 4004 wrote:
perhaps I'm not a republican in a sense
You're not alone. A lot of Republicans don't have any sense. Democrats, too.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
perhaps I'm not a republican in a sense
You're not alone. A lot of Republicans don't have any sense. Democrats, too.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
-
-
Intel 4004 wrote:
Obama has got to go, no doubt about it.
He will... in about 8 years. :laugh:
ShamWow
-
Are you being intentionally obtuse? Or, are you happy being apart of the "me too" group of former neocon cheerleaders? Why weren't you bitching about this stuff when it was happening during the previous administrations? Why do you suddenly care? Why aren't you bitching about the layabouts in the midwest who receive public money to not grow crops? Why weren't you complaining when the federal government under the last administration did all it could to curtail states rights (look up CA vs EPA)? Why didn't you care when public money was spent to build stadiums so that a few people could profit and a lot of people could lose their homes and in turn get good minimum wage jobs selling popcorn? But now you and your ilk care? Now the substance is suddenly more important than the symbolism? Why? You and the rest of the republican cheerleaders have completely lost the plot. You've stopped thinking for yourselves, you accept what you are told and you happily, knowingly, partake in doublethink.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell