Again, what planet is he on?
-
Ilíon wrote:
But then, you're as intellectually dishonest as the other[^] two[^].
i.e. not at all ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Please read this[^] if you don't like the answer I gave to your question. "! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums.
-
JihadWatch: New Obama Oath of Office![^]
"And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." -- Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009[^] [ text of speech as released by White House to USA Today[^] ] So here's the new and improved Presidential Oath of Office: "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. So help me Allah."
Yeah, and he said his name is "Barak Hussain Obama" in his speech. His middle name is Hussein :omg: :omg: :omg: I had suspected it all along. :omg: :omg: :omg: We are all doomed!!!!
-
JihadWatch: New Obama Oath of Office![^]
"And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." -- Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009[^] [ text of speech as released by White House to USA Today[^] ] So here's the new and improved Presidential Oath of Office: "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. So help me Allah."
He is trying to reconciliate 2 worlds. It is certainly worth trying. And if it succeeds, it will cost far less than war.
-
He is trying to reconciliate 2 worlds. It is certainly worth trying. And if it succeeds, it will cost far less than war.
Le Centriste wrote:
He is trying to reconciliate 2 worlds. It is certainly worth trying. And if it succeeds, it will cost far less than war.
And not mess up the oil supply. By the way, the verb form is reconcile.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Le Centriste wrote:
He is trying to reconciliate 2 worlds. It is certainly worth trying. And if it succeeds, it will cost far less than war.
And not mess up the oil supply. By the way, the verb form is reconcile.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
the verb form is reconcile
Thank you for the English lesson, I often make that kind of mistake.
-
Oakman wrote:
the verb form is reconcile
Thank you for the English lesson, I often make that kind of mistake.
Le Centriste wrote:
Thank you for the English lesson, I often make that kind of mistake.
I hope you understand that I was not being snide or making fun of you. Your English, compared to my French, is infinitely superior. (I save my snide remarks for the red-blooded Americans who prove conclusively that they don't know how to write, speak, or spell their native tongue.)
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Le Centriste wrote:
Thank you for the English lesson, I often make that kind of mistake.
I hope you understand that I was not being snide or making fun of you. Your English, compared to my French, is infinitely superior. (I save my snide remarks for the red-blooded Americans who prove conclusively that they don't know how to write, speak, or spell their native tongue.)
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Absolutely. :rose:
-
"part of my responsibility" != part of the Presidential Oath of Office.
John Carson
-
JihadWatch: New Obama Oath of Office![^]
"And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." -- Barack Obama, Cairo, June 4, 2009[^] [ text of speech as released by White House to USA Today[^] ] So here's the new and improved Presidential Oath of Office: "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. So help me Allah."
Well its called reining in Americans. You should delete your message before its too late.
-
Well its called reining in Americans. You should delete your message before its too late.
-
John Carson wrote:
"part of my responsibility" != part of the Presidential Oath of Office.
I believe he was indicating those words are not part of the oath, HOW in Gods name can that make him intellectually dishonest?
fred_ wrote:
I believe he was indicating those words are not part of the oath, HOW in Gods name can that make him intellectually dishonest?
The Zero's assertion is "And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." It is *NOT* "part of [one's] responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." John Carson -- being intellectually dishonest -- *chooses* to ignore the point being made. What's your excuse?
-
fred_ wrote:
I believe he was indicating those words are not part of the oath, HOW in Gods name can that make him intellectually dishonest?
The Zero's assertion is "And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." It is *NOT* "part of [one's] responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." John Carson -- being intellectually dishonest -- *chooses* to ignore the point being made. What's your excuse?
Ilíon wrote:
It is *NOT* "part of [one's] responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." John Carson -- being intellectually dishonest -- *chooses* to ignore the point being made.
Do you consider that it is part of the President's responsibility to, say, tell the truth or avoid incurring excessive debt? Neither of those is in the Presidential oath. I understand that you don't agree with the President fighting negative stereotypes of Islam, but the President chooses to take on many responsibilities that are not Constitutionally mandated. Obama is simply informing the public of one such responsibility he has decided to assume.
John Carson