Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric

NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpannouncement
43 Posts 29 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kant
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

    రవికాంత్

    P D L M J 15 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kant

      The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

      రవికాంత్

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Kant wrote:

      currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons

      Ah - units for my generation. :-D

      "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

      As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kant

        The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

        రవికాంత్

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Douglas Troy
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        WAIT! That's not right ... forgot to carry the decimal, it should be $37.0 million. :-\


        :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
        Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kant

          The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

          రవికాంత్

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Kant wrote:

          pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons.

          Shouldn't that be "the more widely adopted kilograms and meters"?

          ___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

          A M E 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • K Kant

            The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

            రవికాంత్

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            The US is converting to the metric system... inch by inch.

            M L J A 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • K Kant

              The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

              రవికాంత్

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Maximilien
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              As big as it is, I'm quite surprise at the amount, I would have guessed more $$

              This signature was proudly tested on animals.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Pete OHanlon

                Kant wrote:

                currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons

                Ah - units for my generation. :-D

                "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

                As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

                My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                M Offline
                M Offline
                martin_hughes
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Pete O'Hanlon: gentleman, scholar, chap from the north-east and advocate of funky-monkey measurement systems from the olden days! Bring back the Rood, Vigrate, Hide and Link!

                print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kant

                  The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

                  రవికాంత్

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Joe Woodbury
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Never understood why anyone cares. As long as you aren't mixing systems, either one works. "Oh, it's easier to convert..." Yeah, scientists are always doing complex calculations and conversions in their heads. Besides, knowing bureaucracies, some department somewhere wouldn't convert and the state of Florida would explode.

                  Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                  P B T D O 5 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • K Kant

                    The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

                    రవికాంత్

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    swjam
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    i'd be happy to convert it for half as much. i've done more horrible things for less, like code in VB6

                    ---------------------------------------------------------- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Joe Woodbury

                      Never understood why anyone cares. As long as you aren't mixing systems, either one works. "Oh, it's easier to convert..." Yeah, scientists are always doing complex calculations and conversions in their heads. Besides, knowing bureaucracies, some department somewhere wouldn't convert and the state of Florida would explode.

                      Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Parsley72
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Joe Woodbury wrote:

                      As long as you aren't mixing systems, either one works.

                      That's kind of the point - the Mars Climate Orbiter crashed because NASA use Imperial and the subcontractor used Metric: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter[^]

                      P R 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • P Parsley72

                        Joe Woodbury wrote:

                        As long as you aren't mixing systems, either one works.

                        That's kind of the point - the Mars Climate Orbiter crashed because NASA use Imperial and the subcontractor used Metric: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter[^]

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Pierre Leclercq
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Yes, and they say project cost was $327.6 millions. So the lack of coherence hs already cost almost the $370 millions.

                        You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Kant

                          The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

                          రవికాంత్

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          AmazingMo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Kant wrote:

                          the more widely adopted meters and newtons

                          ... or the even more widely adopted metres and newtons.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Kant wrote:

                            pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons.

                            Shouldn't that be "the more widely adopted kilograms and meters"?

                            ___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Anton Afanasyev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            _Maxxx_ wrote:

                            Kant wrote: pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. Shouldn't that be "the more widely adopted kilograms and meters"?

                            Something tells me that with the conversions like pounds=>meters, and feet=>newtons, its going to take a heck of a lot more than 370 million $.

                            During a lecture, a non-sleeping student is like a PC copying data from CD to HDD in DMA mode. That is, incoming data is written straight onto paper, bypassing the brain.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Maximilien

                              As big as it is, I'm quite surprise at the amount, I would have guessed more $$

                              This signature was proudly tested on animals.

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              tec goblin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Yes, I mean this type of amount seems a good investment to the future. An investment that will be paid off just from the fact that metric is way more simple, and is used by physicists etc.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Joe Woodbury

                                Never understood why anyone cares. As long as you aren't mixing systems, either one works. "Oh, it's easier to convert..." Yeah, scientists are always doing complex calculations and conversions in their heads. Besides, knowing bureaucracies, some department somewhere wouldn't convert and the state of Florida would explode.

                                Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                tec goblin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                You just don't get how easier it is to convert. Even volume to weight in metric can be done in our heads, and IS done in our heads for simple things. And of course you're mixing things when you're reading for example an article or collaborate with someone who's not from the States.

                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Kant wrote:

                                  pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons.

                                  Shouldn't that be "the more widely adopted kilograms and meters"?

                                  ___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Newtons and "pounds of thrust" are measurements of force. Technically, because a Newton is a measurement of force, you can use any weight measurement to convey the amount in weigh and indeed, 1N = 0.102kg Unless you're being sarcastic...

                                  If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Joe Woodbury

                                    Never understood why anyone cares. As long as you aren't mixing systems, either one works. "Oh, it's easier to convert..." Yeah, scientists are always doing complex calculations and conversions in their heads. Besides, knowing bureaucracies, some department somewhere wouldn't convert and the state of Florida would explode.

                                    Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    burningbeard
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Joe Woodbury wrote:

                                    ...and the state of Florida would explode.

                                    And that would be a bad thing? :laugh:

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      The US is converting to the metric system... inch by inch.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Now that's funny! :-D

                                      If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • K Kant

                                        The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

                                        రవికాంత్

                                        H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        hairy_hats
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        "Three nations have not officially adopted the International System of Units as their primary or sole system of measurement: Liberia, Myanmar and the United States."

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K Kant

                                          The shuttles that NASA uses to fly to space currently use measurements in the form of pounds and feet as opposed to the more widely adopted meters and newtons. The upcoming shuttle replacement will continue to use the imperial measurement system because it would cost NASA $370 million dollars to convert to the "'International System' of units". NASA: It would cost $370 million to convert to metric[^] :wtf: :omg: Read the comments in that post.

                                          రవికాంత్

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Chris Quinn
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          It's not just conversion that costs - if you read Richard Feynman's account of the investigation of the Challenger shuttlke disaster, NASA turned down an eminently sensible suggestion from an engineer working on the solid rocket boosters to put four blobs of paint near the field joints to help them line up bolts more easily - it would have been too expensive - not for the paint, but to rewrite all of the manuals!

                                          ==================================== Transvestites - Roberts in Disguise! ====================================

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups