How C# are you? [modified]

[Andre xxxxxxx]

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

You, also, can't declare a method as abstract if it's not in an abstract class.

Ok, so Harold was wrong with his answer. In C++/CLI

ref class A
{
virtual foo() = 0;
};

gives a warning because of the missing abstract behind the class. But in C++ you can also provide a default implementation of a method AND declare it as abstract (pure virtual).

class A
{
virtual foo() = 0
{
doSomething();
}
}

If C# does not force me to declare every method as abstract, the test is wrong here again.

[NormDroid]

Most ambiguous set of questions I have ever to set my poor eyes on.

Software Kinetics (requires SL3 beta) - Moving software

[molesworth]

I'm not sure what his intention was. To confuse and babmoozle perhaps? :)

There are three kinds of people in the world - those who can count and those who can't...

[realJSOP]

A multiple choice question should not allow more than one correct answer unless the answers include the choices below: A) answer 1 B) answer 2 C) answer 3 D) All of the above E) None of the above F) The test is crap

"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

[Pete OHanlon]

Andre xxxxxxx wrote:

If C# does not force me to declare every method as abstract, the test is wrong here again.

Correct. The following class is perfectly legal:

public abstract class MyClass
{
private int _myValue;
public void SetMyValue(int myValue)
{
_myValue = myValue;
}

protected int MyValue
{
get { return _myValue; }
}

public abstract int GetMyValueAfterSomeOperation();
}

This would then be used as:

public class MyMultClass
{
private int _myMult;
public MyMultClass(int myMult)
{
_myMult = myMult;
}

public override int GetMyValueAfterSomeOperation()
{
return MyValue * _myMult;
}
}

"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

[NormDroid]

Are you sure you didn't right this test ;) Honestly it begs that pople who create this shit are allow to type at the fucking keyboard.

Software Kinetics (requires SL3 beta) - Moving software

[Andre xxxxxxx]

John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

A) answer 1 B) answer 2 C) answer 3 D) All of the above E) None of the above F) (your answer) The test is crap - correct answer

[NormDroid]

Forgot to annotate it with FTFY

Software Kinetics (requires SL3 beta) - Moving software

[Rob Graham]

Norm .net wrote:

Honestly it begs that pople who create this sh*t are allow to type at the f***ing keyboard.

They didn't. It was scrawled on a bar napkin and handed to a near illiterate secretary.

[0x3c0]

I worked very hard for my GCSEs. I would appreciate it if you didn't deride the work I put in by claiming that I would have got a C if I had just turned up, instead of spending two years learning a syllabus

Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

[Lost User]

We'll never know, though, will we?

___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')