MS Auto Updates - Problem?
-
I haven't had any problems except a system at work where IT has decided to implement an update server so they can "test each update" (I think they're idiots.)
Joe Woodbury wrote:
I think they're idiots
Not necesarily - the MS auto update to IE8 is a good example of an automatic update that can screw your system good and proper. If you can, it makes some sense to pretest updates, particularly if you have a company wide base system.
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
-
Joe Woodbury wrote:
I think they're idiots
Not necesarily - the MS auto update to IE8 is a good example of an automatic update that can screw your system good and proper. If you can, it makes some sense to pretest updates, particularly if you have a company wide base system.
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
I seem to recall a Symantec update that crashed half of China :laugh: And we think MS has problems, can you imagine working for Symantec X| .
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
I seem to recall a Symantec update that crashed half of China :laugh: And we think MS has problems, can you imagine working for Symantec X| .
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
Mycroft Holmes wrote:
can you imagine working for Symantec Dead .
Actually, I used to dream of working at Symantec. This way, I could obliterate their code base, professionally kill all the idiots that abound over there. Of course, I have to think of an escape plan, but I'm banking on them being too stupid to require an elaborate one...
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
-
Mycroft Holmes wrote:
can you imagine working for Symantec Dead .
Actually, I used to dream of working at Symantec. This way, I could obliterate their code base, professionally kill all the idiots that abound over there. Of course, I have to think of an escape plan, but I'm banking on them being too stupid to require an elaborate one...
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
I was wandering through my c:\program files folder a few weeks ago and came across a Symantec folder, nuked it instantly, rebooted and check the hard drive. I then went and washed my hands. I have no idea where it came from, don't care just got it of the drive. It it possible to disinfect or wash parts of the hard disk, I don't want it to upset any of the neighboring files, I hate to think they had to live next to a Symantec.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
Mycroft Holmes wrote:
can you imagine working for Symantec Dead .
Actually, I used to dream of working at Symantec. This way, I could obliterate their code base, professionally kill all the idiots that abound over there. Of course, I have to think of an escape plan, but I'm banking on them being too stupid to require an elaborate one...
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
If you want an escape plan, tell them that you're a reporter for a technology website, and would like to ask them about their use of potentially unfair practices in failing to provide a comprehensive uninstaller. You'll be escorted from the building immediately
Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow
-
I was wandering through my c:\program files folder a few weeks ago and came across a Symantec folder, nuked it instantly, rebooted and check the hard drive. I then went and washed my hands. I have no idea where it came from, don't care just got it of the drive. It it possible to disinfect or wash parts of the hard disk, I don't want it to upset any of the neighboring files, I hate to think they had to live next to a Symantec.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
I know the feeling! It's a pity, they were really good in the Norton Utilities days...
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
-
I know the feeling! It's a pity, they were really good in the Norton Utilities days...
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
You're talking in the good old days (my first days when I was starting to notice that computers can be used for other useful activities besides playing games).
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
-
You're talking in the good old days (my first days when I was starting to notice that computers can be used for other useful activities besides playing games).
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
That was about when they last produced something that wasn't a PITA, yes.
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
-
Is there a recent problem with MS Updates working? Suddenly, (over the past few weeks) both auto and manual updates are slow or non-existent. I've heard everything from Vista SP volume to Registry problems trying to expain it away. Anyone have some insight?
Meh, Microsoft update currently crashes with a DEP violation...
-
I know the feeling! It's a pity, they were really good in the Norton Utilities days...
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
Didn't they have a fairly reasonable C compiler/development system back then as well? I never used it, but I think I remember it getting reasonable reviews in magazines.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
-
That was about when they last produced something that wasn't a PITA, yes.
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
:laugh: Its as if you knew what years I'm talking about?! :laugh: At around the time of Dos 6 if I'm not mistaken. I could always check with my dad.
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
-
Joe Woodbury wrote:
I think they're idiots
Not necesarily - the MS auto update to IE8 is a good example of an automatic update that can screw your system good and proper. If you can, it makes some sense to pretest updates, particularly if you have a company wide base system.
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
I have no problem screening patches for servers, but the notion that most IT departments are qualified (or even have the time) to fully test patches is ludicrous. If they said that they were just going to delay the patches a week and check for reports, I'd understand that. But the testing thing is all about control and nothing more. IE8 didn't screw up my system--for every system I've installed it on (four) it went very smoothly.
-
:laugh: Its as if you knew what years I'm talking about?! :laugh: At around the time of Dos 6 if I'm not mistaken. I could always check with my dad.
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:
I could always check with my dad
Ouch! Accurate, but ouch!
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
-
Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:
I could always check with my dad
Ouch! Accurate, but ouch!
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones
OriginalGriff wrote:
Ouch!
Not intended as such! :angel:
OriginalGriff wrote:
Accurate, but ouch!
I'm only 29!
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
