Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Bing - bottom of the class

Bing - bottom of the class

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharp
21 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dave Parker

    Or the standard file search in Windows XP which decides not to bother searching the content of text files that don't have the .txt extension, such as .cs files, by default without a load of faffing around in the registry. It worked in Windows 2000, why must they keep messing with stuff that works?

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve Thresher
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    To be fair the content searching is Windows 7 is a lot better, it even handles PDF's.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 1 1 21 Gigawatts

      Russell Jones wrote:

      msdn search

      MSDN had a search function?? :-D

      "...great scott!" Dilbert: Aren't all meetings like this... Richard Dawkins: "What if you're wrong?"

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dan_Martin
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      1.21 Gigawatts wrote:

      MSDN had a search function??

      FTFY

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dan_Martin

        1.21 Gigawatts wrote:

        MSDN had a search function??

        FTFY

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        yes. They couldn't let AOL have a monopoly on mailing coasters. :rolleyes:

        The European Way of War: Blow your own continent up. The American Way of War: Go over and help them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Dave Parker

          Or the standard file search in Windows XP which decides not to bother searching the content of text files that don't have the .txt extension, such as .cs files, by default without a load of faffing around in the registry. It worked in Windows 2000, why must they keep messing with stuff that works?

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kevin McFarlane
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Dave Parker wrote:

          Windows XP which decides not to bother searching the content of text files that don't have the .txt extension, such as .cs files, by default without a load of faffing around in the registry.

          I just use a desktop search tool for that.

          Kevin

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Steve Thresher

            Kevin McFarlane wrote:

            Little things like this matter.

            No they don't, JFGI!

            K Offline
            K Offline
            Kevin McFarlane
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Google is my default but I sometimes try alternatives to see whether they've gotten better or not. :)

            Kevin

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kevin McFarlane

              Try typing STM.NET into Google, Yahoo, Ask and Bing. You should see an entry for Microsoft's STM.NET. But you don't with Bing - unless you surround it with quotes. That's a usability own goal IMO. This is the second time something like this has happened to me with Bing. Little things like this matter.

              Kevin

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tomz_KV
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Pretty soon, you'll not see it on Yahoo when it uses Bing search engine.

              TOMZ_KV

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Tomz_KV

                Pretty soon, you'll not see it on Yahoo when it uses Bing search engine.

                TOMZ_KV

                K Offline
                K Offline
                Kevin McFarlane
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                I was looking for some means of sending feedback to Bing on their page but there's nothing there. But I see there is a forum so I'll post there.

                Kevin

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kevin McFarlane

                  I was looking for some means of sending feedback to Bing on their page but there's nothing there. But I see there is a forum so I'll post there.

                  Kevin

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Tomz_KV
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  I sent the link of this post to Bing already. At the bottom right corner on bing page, there is a link - feedback in dimmed color.

                  TOMZ_KV

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dave Parker

                    Or the standard file search in Windows XP which decides not to bother searching the content of text files that don't have the .txt extension, such as .cs files, by default without a load of faffing around in the registry. It worked in Windows 2000, why must they keep messing with stuff that works?

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Russell Jones
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    File search on windows has got worse in each successive iteration since win2k. In vista I just go to the command line these days as I've never managed to find a file through the Search window

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Kevin McFarlane

                      Try typing STM.NET into Google, Yahoo, Ask and Bing. You should see an entry for Microsoft's STM.NET. But you don't with Bing - unless you surround it with quotes. That's a usability own goal IMO. This is the second time something like this has happened to me with Bing. Little things like this matter.

                      Kevin

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jeremy Tierman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      You didn't pay them enough! :cool:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T Tomz_KV

                        I sent the link of this post to Bing already. At the bottom right corner on bing page, there is a link - feedback in dimmed color.

                        TOMZ_KV

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        Kevin McFarlane
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Ah, the bottom row of my page is obscured by my "Try This Search On" Greasemonkey script banner.

                        Kevin

                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Russell Jones

                          File search on windows has got worse in each successive iteration since win2k. In vista I just go to the command line these days as I've never managed to find a file through the Search window

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Kevin McFarlane
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          What about the built-in desktop search in Vista? Won't that do it?

                          Kevin

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K Kevin McFarlane

                            Ah, the bottom row of my page is obscured by my "Try This Search On" Greasemonkey script banner.

                            Kevin

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            Tomz_KV
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            Not sure why your Bing page looks different. It could be that it detects user location and shows something different.

                            TOMZ_KV

                            K 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Tomz_KV

                              Not sure why your Bing page looks different. It could be that it detects user location and shows something different.

                              TOMZ_KV

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              Kevin McFarlane
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              The feedback link is there, it's just that I have a Firefox add-on that pops up a narrow bottom window whenever I do a search on Google, Yahoo, etc. This allows one-click switching to alternative search engines (i.e., without having to re-enter the search). If I close the window then the feedback link is visible. It's just unfortunate that on Bing that row is right at the bottom. This is also the case with Yahoo but not with Google, Ask or Wikipedia. Anyway, I've now sent feedback. :)

                              Kevin

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Russell Jones

                                I'm pretty sure that anyone who had suffered msdn search knew exactly how good Bing was going to be.

                                E Offline
                                E Offline
                                eggsovereasy
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                Ha,one time I was searching for something on MSDN and couldn't find it no matter how I searched. So I went to google and typed my query the way I did the first time and the very first result was the MSDN page I wanted. I haven't used MSDN's search since.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E eggsovereasy

                                  Ha,one time I was searching for something on MSDN and couldn't find it no matter how I searched. So I went to google and typed my query the way I did the first time and the very first result was the MSDN page I wanted. I haven't used MSDN's search since.

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Russell Jones
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  I'd love to see balmers face if he realised just how many developers use google to search for msdn pages, i bet the referrer links would make great reading

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups