Micro$oft vs. ₤inux
-
I was thinking, since many Linux zealots use a dollar sign to spell Microsoft why not use a Lira sign to spell Linux?
Henry Jacobs wrote: I was thinking, since many Linux zealots use a dollar sign to spell Microsoft why not use a Lira sign to spell Linux? Why on earth would we want to do that? Linux guys work for free! I'm thinking that Linux must have originally been owned by P.T. Barnum. :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
-
I was thinking, since many Linux zealots use a dollar sign to spell Microsoft why not use a Lira sign to spell Linux?
I think intentionally misspelling Micro$oft, Microsloth, Windoze etc... shows the immaturity of the majority of Linux 'zealots'. Come on... If they're so desperate to 'insult' MS, can't they come up with something a little more original ?
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
I can levitate birds... -
Screw them. They won't get a thing from me unless I give it away because I want to. Neither should you or anyone else :) It's funny how many Linux Zelots and/or GNU-wannabes have distorted the principle of freedom. The true spirit of GNU is to produce free stuff (with the exception that the stuff cannot be unfree) and the stuff should be free as in free speech - not free beer. I don't know how many times Stallman has repeated this goal - but still the Linux zealots and the GNU-wannabes still think about free beer. I've got news for them - beer isn't free until you're offered one. And isn't it also very bizarre that Linux Zealots - the main defenders of GNU/GPL - utterly hate the father of GNU/GPL? :) It's friday evening and it's time for :beer: -- Please state the nature of your medical emergency.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: don't know how many times Stallman has repeated this goal He repeats this every time I'm reading Bison docs (thanks God we've switched to XML-based file format already): We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to make software proprietary. Software should be free. I guess he's referring to free beer style of software. Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com
*** Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere. ***
-
I think intentionally misspelling Micro$oft, Microsloth, Windoze etc... shows the immaturity of the majority of Linux 'zealots'. Come on... If they're so desperate to 'insult' MS, can't they come up with something a little more original ?
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
I can levitate birds...Some of them show more knowledge of Windows and call it Micros~1. "In an organization, each person rises to the level of his own incompetence." Peter's Principle
-
Screw them. They won't get a thing from me unless I give it away because I want to. Neither should you or anyone else :) It's funny how many Linux Zelots and/or GNU-wannabes have distorted the principle of freedom. The true spirit of GNU is to produce free stuff (with the exception that the stuff cannot be unfree) and the stuff should be free as in free speech - not free beer. I don't know how many times Stallman has repeated this goal - but still the Linux zealots and the GNU-wannabes still think about free beer. I've got news for them - beer isn't free until you're offered one. And isn't it also very bizarre that Linux Zealots - the main defenders of GNU/GPL - utterly hate the father of GNU/GPL? :) It's friday evening and it's time for :beer: -- Please state the nature of your medical emergency.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: ...the stuff should be free as in free speech - not free beer This phrase has never made sense to me and contrdicts both the GNU movement and Stallman's own position. "Free" in "free speech" means uncensored by government. It means people are able to express what they want and charge what they will for that expression and the government can't do a damn thing about it (though they try.) The founders of the United States also recognized that speech could, and should, be owned by the originator for a time and mandated that copyright and patent laws be created (though both have been abused beyond belief.)
-
Some of them show more knowledge of Windows and call it Micros~1. "In an organization, each person rises to the level of his own incompetence." Peter's Principle
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: don't know how many times Stallman has repeated this goal He repeats this every time I'm reading Bison docs (thanks God we've switched to XML-based file format already): We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to make software proprietary. Software should be free. I guess he's referring to free beer style of software. Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com
*** Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere. ***
Aah.. as the Swedish1 saying goes: even the sun has dark spots. :) 1 It may be an international saying, I dunno. -- Please state the nature of your medical emergency.
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: ...the stuff should be free as in free speech - not free beer This phrase has never made sense to me and contrdicts both the GNU movement and Stallman's own position. "Free" in "free speech" means uncensored by government. It means people are able to express what they want and charge what they will for that expression and the government can't do a damn thing about it (though they try.) The founders of the United States also recognized that speech could, and should, be owned by the originator for a time and mandated that copyright and patent laws be created (though both have been abused beyond belief.)
Joe Woodbury wrote: It means people are able to express what they want and charge what they will for that expression and the government can't do a damn thing about it (though they try.) Well, of course you can charge whatever you want for whatever you do :) But I don't think that's what Stallman refers to. I think it's the fact that you are free to speak, and no one can take your spoken word from you and censor it. At least that's how I interprets that phrase. -- Please state the nature of your medical emergency.
-
Some of them show more knowledge of Windows and call it Micros~1. "In an organization, each person rises to the level of his own incompetence." Peter's Principle
LOL :laugh:
Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
I can levitate birds... -
Henry Jacobs wrote: I was thinking, since many Linux zealots use a dollar sign to spell Microsoft why not use a Lira sign to spell Linux? Why on earth would we want to do that? Linux guys work for free! I'm thinking that Linux must have originally been owned by P.T. Barnum. :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
What's with you guys and your hatred towards Linux? Did linux kill your children or something? Jees guys, grow up and use the tools that suit your needs. I bet some Linux programmers could write code circles around some of you any day.:mad: :mad: I use both for development, and I'll tell something right now, there are times where I wish i was doing certain projects on/for linux clients/systems. I'm new here, pardon the n00bing
-
What's with you guys and your hatred towards Linux? Did linux kill your children or something? Jees guys, grow up and use the tools that suit your needs. I bet some Linux programmers could write code circles around some of you any day.:mad: :mad: I use both for development, and I'll tell something right now, there are times where I wish i was doing certain projects on/for linux clients/systems. I'm new here, pardon the n00bing
Hi, Joe. There's no hatred of Linux, at least on my part. In fact, my first professional gig ages ago was in QNX, a real time PC UNIX clone. Many is the day I worked in DOS and missed the horsepower of a good operating system. However, there's definately a pissing contest between Microsoft and Linux, given that MS is the huge, successful company people love to hate and the Linux camp is full of young, idealistic people who think that programming is all about art, money is evil and technology should be free. The reason I poke the Linux guys in the ribs here & there is because of that notion, hence my joke about them working for free. I'm a mercenary and as such have no brand loyalty. I don't care nearly as much about which operating system I'm working in as I do about my hourly rate! In general we're just having a little fun with it all. Try not to take it too seriously. The stress will only shave years off your life. :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
-
Hi, Joe. There's no hatred of Linux, at least on my part. In fact, my first professional gig ages ago was in QNX, a real time PC UNIX clone. Many is the day I worked in DOS and missed the horsepower of a good operating system. However, there's definately a pissing contest between Microsoft and Linux, given that MS is the huge, successful company people love to hate and the Linux camp is full of young, idealistic people who think that programming is all about art, money is evil and technology should be free. The reason I poke the Linux guys in the ribs here & there is because of that notion, hence my joke about them working for free. I'm a mercenary and as such have no brand loyalty. I don't care nearly as much about which operating system I'm working in as I do about my hourly rate! In general we're just having a little fun with it all. Try not to take it too seriously. The stress will only shave years off your life. :-D Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
By the way, and I'm speaking as a part-time linux user. I couldn't give a rats-bum (:-O) whether software or anything I wanted for my linux box was free or not. The whole point of linux is open-source, not free software. I understand a lot of people around here like to use linux is some situations, but those who don't need to show some respect for the other half of coders on this planet I'm new here, pardon the n00bing
-
By the way, and I'm speaking as a part-time linux user. I couldn't give a rats-bum (:-O) whether software or anything I wanted for my linux box was free or not. The whole point of linux is open-source, not free software. I understand a lot of people around here like to use linux is some situations, but those who don't need to show some respect for the other half of coders on this planet I'm new here, pardon the n00bing
Joe Herbert wrote: The whole point of linux is open-source, not free software. I don't doubt your sincerity, though some of your comrades would take exception with that. Joe Herbert wrote: but those who don't need to show some respect Oh, my. :omg: He's expecting respect in the lounge. Anybody wanna clue him in? :-) Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
-
By the way, and I'm speaking as a part-time linux user. I couldn't give a rats-bum (:-O) whether software or anything I wanted for my linux box was free or not. The whole point of linux is open-source, not free software. I understand a lot of people around here like to use linux is some situations, but those who don't need to show some respect for the other half of coders on this planet I'm new here, pardon the n00bing
Joe Herbert wrote: I'm new here, pardon the n00bing Quick rundown of the rules then: - No cussin' - No fightin' - No porn Asking stupid questions is encouraged. Debates about creationism vs Darwinism are scheduled for the third Monday of each month. Debates on Linux vs Windows are held the first Friday each month. cheers, Chris Maunder Q172653: Sometimes Barney Starts Playing Peekaboo on His Own
-
Joe Herbert wrote: I'm new here, pardon the n00bing Quick rundown of the rules then: - No cussin' - No fightin' - No porn Asking stupid questions is encouraged. Debates about creationism vs Darwinism are scheduled for the third Monday of each month. Debates on Linux vs Windows are held the first Friday each month. cheers, Chris Maunder Q172653: Sometimes Barney Starts Playing Peekaboo on His Own
Chris Maunder wrote: Debates about creationism vs Darwinism You mean the stupid ways that people are created vs. the stupid ways they cause their own demise? Chistopher Duncan Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
-
Because most Linux zealots are too busy trying to figure the latest distro's "new and improved" directory structure to figure out how to type stupid foreign characters on their freakin keyboards (that is, if their keyboard works at all). ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: are too busy trying to figure the latest distro's "new and improved" directory structure You having fun with your new Linux boxes huh? :-D
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa -
Some of them show more knowledge of Windows and call it Micros~1. "In an organization, each person rises to the level of his own incompetence." Peter's Principle
Daniel Turini wrote: Micros~1 I like it. :)
as long as I live it will be fine / there's nothing what I can do /
the world will die and so do I / so why should I take care
'Take Care' Funker Vogt -
I was thinking, since many Linux zealots use a dollar sign to spell Microsoft why not use a Lira sign to spell Linux?
Henry Jacobs wrote: why not use a Lira sign to spell Linux? Because GNU/Linux is free.
