Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why 'Message Automatically Removed' sucks today

Why 'Message Automatically Removed' sucks today

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comlounge
28 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    How about those poor kid sisters though?

    C Offline
    C Offline
    CaptainSeeSharp
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    harold aptroot wrote:

    How about those poor kid sisters though?

    If people are truly that sensitive then perhaps they should seek psychological help.

    Fall of the Republic[^]

    L C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C CaptainSeeSharp

      harold aptroot wrote:

      How about those poor kid sisters though?

      If people are truly that sensitive then perhaps they should seek psychological help.

      Fall of the Republic[^]

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Sure, but the rule probably exists for a reason, I mean, Chris isn't a politician is he? :) [edit]to clarify: that means his rules probably make sense

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Sure, but the rule probably exists for a reason, I mean, Chris isn't a politician is he? :) [edit]to clarify: that means his rules probably make sense

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CaptainSeeSharp
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        harold aptroot wrote:

        Sure, but the rule probably exists for a reason, I mean, Chris isn't a politician is he?

        Well, my reply to the donation thread was not about politics, however politics as you so like to call it is part of everyday life. The problem with people is that they consolidate, compartmentalize, and block out what they do not want to face up to.

        Fall of the Republic[^]

        L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Miszou

          So many threads of half-missing conversations. It's like listening to one end of a phone conversation, and all you can hear is "hmmm... aha.... oh yeah, I totally agree.... hahaha... Oh no she didn't!!..." Just because you don't want to read something someone said, doesn't mean you should vote for it to be removed so no one else can read it. Please, let me make up my own mind as to whether I should be able to see all the comments or not. Vote it down if you must, but removing half my reading material just because you don't like someones opinon or whatever is just plain annoying. There, I said it. 'Message Automatically Removed' sucks today (and every day actually).

          The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          In short, CSS is an deranged raving idiot who can't quite get voted off the island before some well meaning idiots make the mistake of trying to argue with him.

          The latest nation. Procrastination.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CaptainSeeSharp

            harold aptroot wrote:

            Sure, but the rule probably exists for a reason, I mean, Chris isn't a politician is he?

            Well, my reply to the donation thread was not about politics, however politics as you so like to call it is part of everyday life. The problem with people is that they consolidate, compartmentalize, and block out what they do not want to face up to.

            Fall of the Republic[^]

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Interesting, it wasn't even me who downvoted you But, seriously, this last message, I really don't understand what you're trying to say here. Also, no offense, but I have a feeling that I might not want to know.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C CaptainSeeSharp

              harold aptroot wrote:

              How about those poor kid sisters though?

              If people are truly that sensitive then perhaps they should seek psychological help.

              Fall of the Republic[^]

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Christian Graus
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Like you explicitly refuse to do ?

              Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C CaptainSeeSharp

                harold aptroot wrote:

                Sure, but the rule probably exists for a reason, I mean, Chris isn't a politician is he?

                Well, my reply to the donation thread was not about politics, however politics as you so like to call it is part of everyday life. The problem with people is that they consolidate, compartmentalize, and block out what they do not want to face up to.

                Fall of the Republic[^]

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                The problem with people is that they consolidate, compartmentalize, and block out what they do not want to face up to.

                What, you mean all of us? We're doomed guys, head for the hills ...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  Like you explicitly refuse to do ?

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CaptainSeeSharp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Becoming chemically lobotomized and sexually impotent are not in my best interests.

                  Fall of the Republic[^]

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C CaptainSeeSharp

                    Becoming chemically lobotomized and sexually impotent are not in my best interests.

                    Fall of the Republic[^]

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Maximilien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    maybe, but it's in our best interests.

                    This signature was proudly tested on animals.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Maximilien

                      maybe, but it's in our best interests.

                      This signature was proudly tested on animals.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      CaptainSeeSharp
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Wanting to hurt or see harm done to others is indicative of a dangerous mental illness. Seek help immediately.

                      Fall of the Republic[^]

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Miszou

                        So many threads of half-missing conversations. It's like listening to one end of a phone conversation, and all you can hear is "hmmm... aha.... oh yeah, I totally agree.... hahaha... Oh no she didn't!!..." Just because you don't want to read something someone said, doesn't mean you should vote for it to be removed so no one else can read it. Please, let me make up my own mind as to whether I should be able to see all the comments or not. Vote it down if you must, but removing half my reading material just because you don't like someones opinon or whatever is just plain annoying. There, I said it. 'Message Automatically Removed' sucks today (and every day actually).

                        The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BillWoodruff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Miszou wrote:

                        Just because you don't want to read something someone said, doesn't mean you should vote for it to be removed so no one else can read it.

                        Hi Miszou, How about we make a bargain here : if you don't tell me what I should or shouldn't do, or how I should, or should not vote, I won't tell you what you should or should not think :) Just because one or more persons vote to remove a message does not mean that message is automtically removed ! I trust Chris and CP staff to do "the right thing" to keep the Lounge and CP a place that "nurtures community," and is "kid sister safe." I am sure the decisions they make about what to remove are deliberate, and well thought out.

                        Miszou wrote:

                        Please, let me make up my own mind as to whether I should be able to see all the comments or not.

                        Is there something stopping you right now from "making up your own mind" whether you read comments on a removed post, or any other posts ? Learn to stop reading things when they confuse you, unless you suspect/believe they contain content worth learning something from, and, imho, you will be more at peace. Of course : "being more at peace" could then deprive addicts of "SuckPosts" of their "daily bread" : the moral issue in that ... well, each of us must come to grips with that using hazardous-material evaluation and handling techniques of our own choosing. Also, think of this : allowing banned messages to persist in some form would then diminish the "spectrum of suckness,' impoverish the lives of those who live to write code like :

                        // I am pretty new to Linq : please feel free to "fix" (neuter, or spay) this code to taste

                        List<SpectrumOfSuckness.Posts.SuckPostTopicType> possibleSuckPostTopics =
                        new List<SpectrumOfSuckness.Posts.SuckPostTopicType>();

                        possibleSuckPostTopics =
                        (
                        from suckPostTopic in SpectrumOfSuckness.SuckTopics

                        	where
                        		suckPostTopic.TopicFlavor == SpectrumOfSuckness.Flavors.Suckissimus
                        
                        	orderby 
                        		suckPostTopic.IrritationQuotient ascending
                        			
                            	select suckPostTopic
                        

                        )
                        .ToList();

                        // selection procedure from list of possibleSuckPostTopics
                        // left out here as an exercise for the reader

                        best, Bill

                        "Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, num

                        C T 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • B BillWoodruff

                          Miszou wrote:

                          Just because you don't want to read something someone said, doesn't mean you should vote for it to be removed so no one else can read it.

                          Hi Miszou, How about we make a bargain here : if you don't tell me what I should or shouldn't do, or how I should, or should not vote, I won't tell you what you should or should not think :) Just because one or more persons vote to remove a message does not mean that message is automtically removed ! I trust Chris and CP staff to do "the right thing" to keep the Lounge and CP a place that "nurtures community," and is "kid sister safe." I am sure the decisions they make about what to remove are deliberate, and well thought out.

                          Miszou wrote:

                          Please, let me make up my own mind as to whether I should be able to see all the comments or not.

                          Is there something stopping you right now from "making up your own mind" whether you read comments on a removed post, or any other posts ? Learn to stop reading things when they confuse you, unless you suspect/believe they contain content worth learning something from, and, imho, you will be more at peace. Of course : "being more at peace" could then deprive addicts of "SuckPosts" of their "daily bread" : the moral issue in that ... well, each of us must come to grips with that using hazardous-material evaluation and handling techniques of our own choosing. Also, think of this : allowing banned messages to persist in some form would then diminish the "spectrum of suckness,' impoverish the lives of those who live to write code like :

                          // I am pretty new to Linq : please feel free to "fix" (neuter, or spay) this code to taste

                          List<SpectrumOfSuckness.Posts.SuckPostTopicType> possibleSuckPostTopics =
                          new List<SpectrumOfSuckness.Posts.SuckPostTopicType>();

                          possibleSuckPostTopics =
                          (
                          from suckPostTopic in SpectrumOfSuckness.SuckTopics

                          	where
                          		suckPostTopic.TopicFlavor == SpectrumOfSuckness.Flavors.Suckissimus
                          
                          	orderby 
                          		suckPostTopic.IrritationQuotient ascending
                          			
                              	select suckPostTopic
                          

                          )
                          .ToList();

                          // selection procedure from list of possibleSuckPostTopics
                          // left out here as an exercise for the reader

                          best, Bill

                          "Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, num

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          CaptainSeeSharp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          You reek of disdain and insolence. You can put perfume on shit but that doesn't make it stink any less.

                          Fall of the Republic[^]

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C CaptainSeeSharp

                            Wanting to hurt or see harm done to others is indicative of a dangerous mental illness. Seek help immediately.

                            Fall of the Republic[^]

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            AspDotNetDev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            You state:

                            • If people are deranged, they should seek psychological help.
                            • You refuse to seek psychological help, because it will make you sexually impotent and chemically lobotomized.
                            • Wanting to see harm done to others indicates a dangerous mental illness.
                            • Those with a dangerous mental illness should seek help (presumably psychological) immediately.

                            Conclusion:

                            • You think others that are too sensitive should seek psychological help.
                            • Psychologial help is harmful.
                            • You wish that what is harmful (psychological help) to be applied to others (those who are too sensitive).
                            • Since you want to see harm (psychological help) applied to others (the too sensitive), you have a dangerous mental illnesss and should seek (psychological) help immediately.

                            Visual Studio is an excellent GUIIDE.

                            C B 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • A AspDotNetDev

                              You state:

                              • If people are deranged, they should seek psychological help.
                              • You refuse to seek psychological help, because it will make you sexually impotent and chemically lobotomized.
                              • Wanting to see harm done to others indicates a dangerous mental illness.
                              • Those with a dangerous mental illness should seek help (presumably psychological) immediately.

                              Conclusion:

                              • You think others that are too sensitive should seek psychological help.
                              • Psychologial help is harmful.
                              • You wish that what is harmful (psychological help) to be applied to others (those who are too sensitive).
                              • Since you want to see harm (psychological help) applied to others (the too sensitive), you have a dangerous mental illnesss and should seek (psychological) help immediately.

                              Visual Studio is an excellent GUIIDE.

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              CaptainSeeSharp
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              aspdotnetdev wrote:

                              You state: * If people are deranged, they should seek psychological help. * You refuse to seek psychological help, because it will make you sexually impotent and chemically lobotomized. * Wanting to see harm done to others indicates a dangerous mental illness. * Those with a dangerous mental illness should seek help (presumably psychological) immediately. Conclusion: * You think others that are too sensitive should seek psychological help. * Psychologial help is harmful. * You wish that what is harmful (psychological help) to be applied to others (those who are too sensitive). * Since you want to see harm (psychological help) applied to others (the too sensitive), you have a dangerous mental illnesss and should seek (psychological) help immediately.

                              I knew someone would reply with this. I was simply redirecting his evil wishes back to himself where they rightfully belong.

                              Fall of the Republic[^]

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                aspdotnetdev wrote:

                                You state: * If people are deranged, they should seek psychological help. * You refuse to seek psychological help, because it will make you sexually impotent and chemically lobotomized. * Wanting to see harm done to others indicates a dangerous mental illness. * Those with a dangerous mental illness should seek help (presumably psychological) immediately. Conclusion: * You think others that are too sensitive should seek psychological help. * Psychologial help is harmful. * You wish that what is harmful (psychological help) to be applied to others (those who are too sensitive). * Since you want to see harm (psychological help) applied to others (the too sensitive), you have a dangerous mental illnesss and should seek (psychological) help immediately.

                                I knew someone would reply with this. I was simply redirecting his evil wishes back to himself where they rightfully belong.

                                Fall of the Republic[^]

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                AspDotNetDev
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                *Guy trips and falls on face* Then replies: "I meant to do that; I was actually just checking to see what it was like to see the ground approaching with the acceleration of gravity."

                                Visual Studio is an excellent GUIIDE.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                  You reek of disdain and insolence. You can put perfume on shit but that doesn't make it stink any less.

                                  Fall of the Republic[^]

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  BillWoodruff
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                  You reek of disdain and insolence.

                                  Thanks, CSS, Have your first five for that almost Chaucerian riposte ! That's a high standard to live up to, but I will try :) best, Bill

                                  "Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    How about those poor kid sisters though?

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mark_Wallace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Going by the ages of most people here, it's *I* who is not KSS.

                                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B BillWoodruff

                                      Miszou wrote:

                                      Just because you don't want to read something someone said, doesn't mean you should vote for it to be removed so no one else can read it.

                                      Hi Miszou, How about we make a bargain here : if you don't tell me what I should or shouldn't do, or how I should, or should not vote, I won't tell you what you should or should not think :) Just because one or more persons vote to remove a message does not mean that message is automtically removed ! I trust Chris and CP staff to do "the right thing" to keep the Lounge and CP a place that "nurtures community," and is "kid sister safe." I am sure the decisions they make about what to remove are deliberate, and well thought out.

                                      Miszou wrote:

                                      Please, let me make up my own mind as to whether I should be able to see all the comments or not.

                                      Is there something stopping you right now from "making up your own mind" whether you read comments on a removed post, or any other posts ? Learn to stop reading things when they confuse you, unless you suspect/believe they contain content worth learning something from, and, imho, you will be more at peace. Of course : "being more at peace" could then deprive addicts of "SuckPosts" of their "daily bread" : the moral issue in that ... well, each of us must come to grips with that using hazardous-material evaluation and handling techniques of our own choosing. Also, think of this : allowing banned messages to persist in some form would then diminish the "spectrum of suckness,' impoverish the lives of those who live to write code like :

                                      // I am pretty new to Linq : please feel free to "fix" (neuter, or spay) this code to taste

                                      List<SpectrumOfSuckness.Posts.SuckPostTopicType> possibleSuckPostTopics =
                                      new List<SpectrumOfSuckness.Posts.SuckPostTopicType>();

                                      possibleSuckPostTopics =
                                      (
                                      from suckPostTopic in SpectrumOfSuckness.SuckTopics

                                      	where
                                      		suckPostTopic.TopicFlavor == SpectrumOfSuckness.Flavors.Suckissimus
                                      
                                      	orderby 
                                      		suckPostTopic.IrritationQuotient ascending
                                      			
                                          	select suckPostTopic
                                      

                                      )
                                      .ToList();

                                      // selection procedure from list of possibleSuckPostTopics
                                      // left out here as an exercise for the reader

                                      best, Bill

                                      "Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, num

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Tom Deketelaere
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      BillWoodruff wrote:

                                      Just because one or more persons vote to remove a message does not mean that message is automtically removed ! I trust Chris and CP staff to do "the right thing" to keep the Lounge and CP a place that "nurtures community," and is "kid sister safe." I am sure the decisions they make about what to remove are deliberate, and well thought out.

                                      Actually I think it takes 13 people to press the 'vote to remove message' button, after that the post get removed without intervention of Chris or the staff.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Miszou

                                        So many threads of half-missing conversations. It's like listening to one end of a phone conversation, and all you can hear is "hmmm... aha.... oh yeah, I totally agree.... hahaha... Oh no she didn't!!..." Just because you don't want to read something someone said, doesn't mean you should vote for it to be removed so no one else can read it. Please, let me make up my own mind as to whether I should be able to see all the comments or not. Vote it down if you must, but removing half my reading material just because you don't like someones opinon or whatever is just plain annoying. There, I said it. 'Message Automatically Removed' sucks today (and every day actually).

                                        The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter

                                        V Offline
                                        V Offline
                                        Vikram A Punathambekar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        I understand where you're coming from, but the messages that get deleted are usually in extremely poor taste or racist and violate the KSS rule in some way or the other. People complained that removing the message caused lack of continuity, so Chris left the message with the placeholder, now people don't like this either. Sometimes I really pity Maunder.

                                        Cheers, Vikram. (Cracked not one CCC, but two!)

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A AspDotNetDev

                                          You state:

                                          • If people are deranged, they should seek psychological help.
                                          • You refuse to seek psychological help, because it will make you sexually impotent and chemically lobotomized.
                                          • Wanting to see harm done to others indicates a dangerous mental illness.
                                          • Those with a dangerous mental illness should seek help (presumably psychological) immediately.

                                          Conclusion:

                                          • You think others that are too sensitive should seek psychological help.
                                          • Psychologial help is harmful.
                                          • You wish that what is harmful (psychological help) to be applied to others (those who are too sensitive).
                                          • Since you want to see harm (psychological help) applied to others (the too sensitive), you have a dangerous mental illnesss and should seek (psychological) help immediately.

                                          Visual Studio is an excellent GUIIDE.

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          Brady Kelly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          :thumbsup: :laugh:

                                          I have been trying for weeks to get this little site indexed. If you wonder what it is, or would like some informal accommodation for the 2010 World Cup, please click on this link for Rhino Cottages.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups