'Evil' Windows 7 campaign goes global
-
I see everyone as fluffy bunny rabbits. ... When I'm hungry!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
it looks much more like a "Let's destroy Microsoft" movement.
It's the same old, same old. People who constantly look for conspiracy theories are the ones who want to be running conspiracies. People who constantly accuse other of lying are the biggest liars on the planet. People who want to drag down corporations want to own and run bigger corporations. The evil that people always see in others is really the evil that's within themselves, because it is very difficult to see any motivations except those which drive oneself.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
So in your mind, those who investigate criminals are the real bad guys?
-
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
and not like fully equipped Apple machines.
I'm off to the Apple Store tomorrow to complain. My Macbook doesn't have a toaster, or a kettle and therefore it cannot be fully equipped.
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
MS is absolute 'evil'
Why. You have said nothing to justify this statement.
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
It is not like free Linux
Because something is free it does not stop it from being evil. True evil offers everything for free. You talk about using pirated software, therefore stealing from hard working people. No sir! It is you that is evil.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
When someone has a monopoly on something that everybody needs, you should be concerned.
-
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
and not like fully equipped Apple machines.
I'm off to the Apple Store tomorrow to complain. My Macbook doesn't have a toaster, or a kettle and therefore it cannot be fully equipped.
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
MS is absolute 'evil'
Why. You have said nothing to justify this statement.
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
It is not like free Linux
Because something is free it does not stop it from being evil. True evil offers everything for free. You talk about using pirated software, therefore stealing from hard working people. No sir! It is you that is evil.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Henry Minute wrote:
I'm off to the Apple Store tomorrow to complain. My Macbook doesn't have a toaster, or a kettle and therefore it cannot be fully equipped.
That's an irony...
Henry Minute wrote:
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote: MS is absolute 'evil' Why. You have said nothing to justify this statement.
Everything said above justifies that M$ is 'evil'
Henry Minute wrote:
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote: It is not like free Linux Because something is free it does not stop it from being evil. True evil offers everything for free.
Well, from your point nature is evil too... Free medicine? Cancer research? Google search and all its services? Wikipedia? Codeproject? You're using CP for free, don't you? When something is free - you can choose to use it or not - that's not evil.
Henry Minute wrote:
You talk about using pirated software, therefore stealing from hard working people. No sir! It is you that is evil.
But when two companies (IBM and MS) stole the work of person created CP/M to build their PC/MS DOS system - that's piracy. Copy windows interface from Xerox system and then from Applie - not a piracy? I've used piracy software alot some time ago, same as millions of other people who couldn't afford buying MS "work". However I'm still absolutely clear with opinion that people shouldn't pay for such kind of sh!tty software which is however a monopoly. I'll pay for Mac, I'll donate to OS projects, but will never pay for Office 2007 and will use pirated office 2003. That's life, that's true. I'm not making money on office but I have to use it because everyone is using it. You're too M$ optimistic and loyal I should say. Try UBUNTU - feel free... Like in "free beer", I suppose you like to get couple of pintas for free!
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
-
When someone has a monopoly on something that everybody needs, you should be concerned.
Or not to pay for it, they will never know about it anyway :-)
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
-
When someone has a monopoly on something that everybody needs, you should be concerned.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
When someone has a monopoly on something that everybody needs, you should be concerned.
But nobody needs Microsoft's products. It's just that many people prefer them to the alternatives that are available; including all the free offerings.
-
'Evil' Windows 7 campaign goes global[^] Also, have you noticed how the comments to The Register posts are full of anti-MS zealots? (At the time of writing no comments yet on this one though.)
Kevin
Brown noted it's "very easy" to reach developers, but almost impossible to make the connection outside of that. I wonder wonder wonder why... It's like "Coca Cola created a new soft drink - why not try a Pepsi instead?" Weird.
Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Henry Minute wrote:
I'm off to the Apple Store tomorrow to complain. My Macbook doesn't have a toaster, or a kettle and therefore it cannot be fully equipped.
That's an irony...
Henry Minute wrote:
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote: MS is absolute 'evil' Why. You have said nothing to justify this statement.
Everything said above justifies that M$ is 'evil'
Henry Minute wrote:
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote: It is not like free Linux Because something is free it does not stop it from being evil. True evil offers everything for free.
Well, from your point nature is evil too... Free medicine? Cancer research? Google search and all its services? Wikipedia? Codeproject? You're using CP for free, don't you? When something is free - you can choose to use it or not - that's not evil.
Henry Minute wrote:
You talk about using pirated software, therefore stealing from hard working people. No sir! It is you that is evil.
But when two companies (IBM and MS) stole the work of person created CP/M to build their PC/MS DOS system - that's piracy. Copy windows interface from Xerox system and then from Applie - not a piracy? I've used piracy software alot some time ago, same as millions of other people who couldn't afford buying MS "work". However I'm still absolutely clear with opinion that people shouldn't pay for such kind of sh!tty software which is however a monopoly. I'll pay for Mac, I'll donate to OS projects, but will never pay for Office 2007 and will use pirated office 2003. That's life, that's true. I'm not making money on office but I have to use it because everyone is using it. You're too M$ optimistic and loyal I should say. Try UBUNTU - feel free... Like in "free beer", I suppose you like to get couple of pintas for free!
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
But when two companies (IBM and MS) stole the work of person created CP/M to build their PC/MS DOS system - that's piracy. Copy windows interface from Xerox system and then from Applie - not a piracy?
I happen to be old, and back from that day. In those days access to computers was limited and source code was widely shared. Thing is life changed, Arpanet is what you use here. So there were pluses and minuses about what happened. That said a knee jerk statement like MS is evil only demonstrates a level of immaturity that I cannot even begin to address
-
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
But when two companies (IBM and MS) stole the work of person created CP/M to build their PC/MS DOS system - that's piracy. Copy windows interface from Xerox system and then from Applie - not a piracy?
I happen to be old, and back from that day. In those days access to computers was limited and source code was widely shared. Thing is life changed, Arpanet is what you use here. So there were pluses and minuses about what happened. That said a knee jerk statement like MS is evil only demonstrates a level of immaturity that I cannot even begin to address
I good memory of Gary Kildall I cannot agree with you. Those time MS WAS an evil, CP/M is stolen and that is true. Details of it is hidden by you know who and there's no need to explain why. I worked on CP/M and programmed for it using ASM and I should say that its basics are same as in MS-DOS with correction to 16 bit nature of x86 processors. CP/M-80 is a predecessor of DR-DOS which was legal move towards x86 architecture and made by Digital Research. MS/PC-DOS is fully rewritten version of CP/M-80. Google for details. P.S. Right now I'm working on XP, sure it is best today's OS from MS and will remain the best for some time. But it doesn't mean that MS will be monopoly forever, its time will pass soon as MS have some fast, good moving and young competitors behind. MS is too lazy and huge monster.
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
-
I good memory of Gary Kildall I cannot agree with you. Those time MS WAS an evil, CP/M is stolen and that is true. Details of it is hidden by you know who and there's no need to explain why. I worked on CP/M and programmed for it using ASM and I should say that its basics are same as in MS-DOS with correction to 16 bit nature of x86 processors. CP/M-80 is a predecessor of DR-DOS which was legal move towards x86 architecture and made by Digital Research. MS/PC-DOS is fully rewritten version of CP/M-80. Google for details. P.S. Right now I'm working on XP, sure it is best today's OS from MS and will remain the best for some time. But it doesn't mean that MS will be monopoly forever, its time will pass soon as MS have some fast, good moving and young competitors behind. MS is too lazy and huge monster.
------------------------------------------------------------ Want to be happy - do what you like!
Nickolay Karnaukhov wrote:
CP/M-80 is a predecessor of DR-DOS which was legal move towards x86 architecture and made by Digital Research. MS/PC-DOS is fully rewritten version of CP/M-80.
Very aware.. I'm a old fart got involved back in those days... my point is and I disagree .. worked on TST , other OS's .. in my humble opinion Weven is the best OS I ever used, not a MS shrill either
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
When someone has a monopoly on something that everybody needs, you should be concerned.
But nobody needs Microsoft's products. It's just that many people prefer them to the alternatives that are available; including all the free offerings.
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
But nobody needs Microsoft's products.
They do if they want their business to run smoothly, because MS software is required to get any work done since they are the industry standard.
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
But nobody needs Microsoft's products.
They do if they want their business to run smoothly, because MS software is required to get any work done since they are the industry standard.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They do if they want their business to run smoothly, because MS software is required to get any work done since they are the industry standard.
Not true at all. There are many alternatives to Microsofts products. Also many corporations do large parts of their business on mainframes which run without any Microsoft products involved.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They do if they want their business to run smoothly, because MS software is required to get any work done since they are the industry standard.
Not true at all. There are many alternatives to Microsofts products. Also many corporations do large parts of their business on mainframes which run without any Microsoft products involved.
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
Not true at all. There are many alternatives to Microsofts products.
How many employees are actually trained to use those products? Can the house software work with alternative systems? What about productivity levels? What kind of costs are associated with using alternative software products? I take it that you don't have much experience or foresight into these matters, you are simple a MS fanboy.
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
Not true at all. There are many alternatives to Microsofts products.
How many employees are actually trained to use those products? Can the house software work with alternative systems? What about productivity levels? What kind of costs are associated with using alternative software products? I take it that you don't have much experience or foresight into these matters, you are simple a MS fanboy.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I take it that you don't have much experience or foresight into these matters, you are simple a MS fanboy.
Now where did you get this information from? You know almost nothing about me so you are 1) not in a position to make any assessment of either my experience or my proclivities and 2) as usual descending to personal abuse as soon as you start losing the argument.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I take it that you don't have much experience or foresight into these matters, you are simple a MS fanboy.
Now where did you get this information from? You know almost nothing about me so you are 1) not in a position to make any assessment of either my experience or my proclivities and 2) as usual descending to personal abuse as soon as you start losing the argument.
Everyone understands why you take offense to what I said. Explain to everyone again how only evil people have complaints against MS.
-
Everyone understands why you take offense to what I said. Explain to everyone again how only evil people have complaints against MS.