Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Dates

Dates

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
111 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Keith Barrow

    Mike Mullikin wrote:

    imperial progeny

    I suggest you read your own history, figure out who you were trying to gain Independance from in the War of Independance (which by the way, at the time was considered a civil war) and then realise why you are all speaking English. Bl**dy colonials :-)

    CCC solved so far: 2 (including a Hard One!)

    W Offline
    W Offline
    Wjousts
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    keefb wrote:

    figure out who you were trying to gain Independance from in the War of Independance

    So rich white guys wouldn't have to pay taxes? A trend that continues to this day.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Abu Mami

      and Chuck Norris is 5' 10"

      R Offline
      R Offline
      realJSOP
      wrote on last edited by
      #91

      Apparently, in Europe, you'd have to say that backwards - 10" 5'. And they still measure weight with stones over there.

      .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
      -----
      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

      M P 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Rage

        That's sort of asking for a flame war, eh eh. But, well, let's go: Writing MM-DD-YYYY is about as silly as still using inches, feet and whatever clumsy measurement units while everybody else with a bit of common sense in the world use the metric system.

        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriff
        wrote on last edited by
        #92

        Rage wrote:

        about as silly as still using inches, feet and whatever clumsy measurement units while everybody else with a bit of common sense in the world use the metric system

        Reluctantly, I have to disagree: inches are more precise! Don't believe me? Look at a normal ruler - metric scale is per millimeter, imperial scale is normally per 1/32nd of an inch (some are 1/64th). Since there are 25.4 millimeters to the inch, the imperial scale is clearly more accurate! Ducks for cover!

        No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Simon P Stevens

          So today is 20th of October 2009. In UK format that is 20/10/2009. Kinda makes sense right, smallest to biggest. Logical. In US format it's 10/20/2009. Now to me that's totally illogical. Why would you do that. Can any Americans explain to me why this makes sense. (lets try to forget about patriotism). I don't understand why it would ever be useful to break the logical order. It's like writing the time in HH:SS:MM. [As a developer I obviously recognise that the superior format is neither of the above but is in fact YYYY-MM-DD as it maintains correct sort order and digit significance]

          Simon

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kinar
          wrote on last edited by
          #93

          as someone else has stated, I personally prefer 10/20/2009 because thats the way I say it in casual conversation "October Twentieth". I don't say "Twentieth of October" very frequently if at all. However, from a programming point of view (and the way I ALWAYS do dates if it is up to me), the form 2009/10/20 makes the most sense. Or usually when programming I leave out the separators so that it is in the format CCYYMMDD. I use this format because sorting by date actually works.

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R realJSOP

            Apparently, in Europe, you'd have to say that backwards - 10" 5'. And they still measure weight with stones over there.

            .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
            -----
            "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
            -----
            "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Michael Schubert
            wrote on last edited by
            #94

            John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

            And they still measure weight with stones over there.

            Only the Brits and the Irish, as far as I know.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R realJSOP

              Apparently, in Europe, you'd have to say that backwards - 10" 5'. And they still measure weight with stones over there.

              .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
              -----
              "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
              -----
              "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #95

              Otherwise they have no stones. :-D

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K kinar

                as someone else has stated, I personally prefer 10/20/2009 because thats the way I say it in casual conversation "October Twentieth". I don't say "Twentieth of October" very frequently if at all. However, from a programming point of view (and the way I ALWAYS do dates if it is up to me), the form 2009/10/20 makes the most sense. Or usually when programming I leave out the separators so that it is in the format CCYYMMDD. I use this format because sorting by date actually works.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #96

                There is no need to say and write it the same way.

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Simon P Stevens

                  So today is 20th of October 2009. In UK format that is 20/10/2009. Kinda makes sense right, smallest to biggest. Logical. In US format it's 10/20/2009. Now to me that's totally illogical. Why would you do that. Can any Americans explain to me why this makes sense. (lets try to forget about patriotism). I don't understand why it would ever be useful to break the logical order. It's like writing the time in HH:SS:MM. [As a developer I obviously recognise that the superior format is neither of the above but is in fact YYYY-MM-DD as it maintains correct sort order and digit significance]

                  Simon

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  PIEBALDconsult
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #97

                  ISO 8601 -- all the time. Educate the masses; don't placate them.

                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                    There is no need to say and write it the same way.

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kinar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #98

                    While I don't disagree, I also don't really care. Seriously, it isn't a big deal. Except on the interwebs.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                      Rage wrote:

                      about as silly as still using inches, feet and whatever clumsy measurement units while everybody else with a bit of common sense in the world use the metric system

                      Reluctantly, I have to disagree: inches are more precise! Don't believe me? Look at a normal ruler - metric scale is per millimeter, imperial scale is normally per 1/32nd of an inch (some are 1/64th). Since there are 25.4 millimeters to the inch, the imperial scale is clearly more accurate! Ducks for cover!

                      No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dan Neely
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #99

                      It depends on the ruler. Unless you're actually paying for a good one (something getting tricky since buying quality instead of cheap Chinese junk has somehow become unAmerican X| ) ours tend to bottom out at 1/16th and I've actually seen a few plastic cheapos, good only as strait edges, that only did 8ths. :wtf: :omg: I don't recall if they had a metric scale on them or not.

                      The latest nation. Procrastination.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Simon P Stevens

                        So today is 20th of October 2009. In UK format that is 20/10/2009. Kinda makes sense right, smallest to biggest. Logical. In US format it's 10/20/2009. Now to me that's totally illogical. Why would you do that. Can any Americans explain to me why this makes sense. (lets try to forget about patriotism). I don't understand why it would ever be useful to break the logical order. It's like writing the time in HH:SS:MM. [As a developer I obviously recognise that the superior format is neither of the above but is in fact YYYY-MM-DD as it maintains correct sort order and digit significance]

                        Simon

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Joan M
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #100

                        I'm really disappointed... I was expecting a thread more on the how to speak with a girl or something like that... :rolleyes:

                        [www.tamelectromecanica.com][www.tam.cat]

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P phannon86

                          See I've always wondered this, I'm left handed, and feel very comfortable changing gear with the left with the right hand on the wheel. I've imagined changing gear with my right hand, and it feels odd!

                          He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man. Current Weight: 16st. 2lbs 10/10/2009 Target Weight : 14st. Weight lost : 0lbs

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          Gary Wheeler
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #101

                          phannon86 wrote:

                          changing gear with my right hand, and it feels odd

                          You silly person. Shifting with the right hand is exactly the way God and Henry Ford intended.

                          Software Zen: delete this;

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            ISO 8601 -- all the time. Educate the masses; don't placate them.

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gary Wheeler
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #102

                            PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                            Educate the masses; don't placate them

                            You obviously have never run from an angry mob.

                            Software Zen: delete this;

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Joan M

                              I'm really disappointed... I was expecting a thread more on the how to speak with a girl or something like that... :rolleyes:

                              [www.tamelectromecanica.com][www.tam.cat]

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Dan Neely
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #103

                              I'd think you'd be an expert on that already. :D

                              The latest nation. Procrastination.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Simon P Stevens

                                So today is 20th of October 2009. In UK format that is 20/10/2009. Kinda makes sense right, smallest to biggest. Logical. In US format it's 10/20/2009. Now to me that's totally illogical. Why would you do that. Can any Americans explain to me why this makes sense. (lets try to forget about patriotism). I don't understand why it would ever be useful to break the logical order. It's like writing the time in HH:SS:MM. [As a developer I obviously recognise that the superior format is neither of the above but is in fact YYYY-MM-DD as it maintains correct sort order and digit significance]

                                Simon

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                John M Drescher
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #104

                                I believe the most logical form is: 2009/10/20

                                John

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K Keith Barrow

                                  160 Fluid Ounces, naturally

                                  CCC solved so far: 2 (including a Hard One!)

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  John M Drescher
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #105

                                  I thought it was 128 ounces. Or 4 quarts which are 32 ounces each.

                                  John

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Dalek Dave

                                    An eighth of a gallon.

                                    ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    JimmyRopes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #106

                                    Dalek Dave wrote:

                                    An eighth of a gallon.

                                    Which Gallon?

                                    Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                    Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                    I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Brady Kelly

                                      Fish don't drink a lot. They don't have to.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Steve Mayfield
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #107

                                      Fish drink 24/7 ;P (unless they are on the hook for something :doh: )

                                      Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Dario Solera

                                        And what is a gallon?

                                        If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that "says something" about your personality, don't bother. You don't have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. - Charlie Brooker My Photos/CP Flickr Group - ScrewTurn Wiki v3

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Steve Mayfield
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #108

                                        her date if he gets lucky?

                                        Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • W Wjousts

                                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                                          And this is not Nationalistic BS...many studies will show this

                                          Citation needed

                                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                                          Samoa recently changed from right to left.

                                          Only so they could import cheaper cars from Australia instead of shipping them from the US. Also, it caused major problems with buses that have doors that now open into oncoming traffic :wtf:

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jsc42
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #109

                                          I heard (citation needed) that the first Macdonalds Drive-Thru restaurant in the UK was built using the standard plan that came from America. It wasn't until the first people started to use it that they discovered that the customers could not receive the orders because the delivery hatches were on the opposite side from the driver's door windows.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups