The Oath Keepers
-
What are you talking about ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Learn about how the Oath Keepers, a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution and not follow unlawful orders to oppress the American people. Part 1 of 2 (7:27)[^] Part 2 of 2 (8:02)[^]
-
Again, the 52nd Chairborne march proudly against their own paranoid imaginings. Oh how these valiant heroes struggle against the oppressive tyranny inflicted upon them by a reality that is not half as fractured as their tiny minds.
After reading some history, particularly some of the diary excerpts and letters from British troops and Americans, your comments remind of some of the stupid British. Yet after the war that we won, we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology that your country could not achieve. Now we face a similar situation involving your type of mindset.
-
After reading some history, particularly some of the diary excerpts and letters from British troops and Americans, your comments remind of some of the stupid British. Yet after the war that we won, we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology that your country could not achieve. Now we face a similar situation involving your type of mindset.
-
Learn about how the Oath Keepers, a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution and not follow unlawful orders to oppress the American people. Part 1 of 2 (7:27)[^] Part 2 of 2 (8:02)[^]
Why aren't they a partisan organization?
-
Why aren't they a partisan organization?
73Zeppelin wrote:
Why aren't they a partisan organization?
What purpose would that serve?
-
After reading some history, particularly some of the diary excerpts and letters from British troops and Americans, your comments remind of some of the stupid British. Yet after the war that we won, we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology that your country could not achieve. Now we face a similar situation involving your type of mindset.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Yet after the war that we won, we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology that your country could not achieve.
Ah, so you never read where I pointed out I am American a while back. But where does this have anything to do with pointing out this is little more than another blob of paranoid drivel. Now, I'm not sure about you, but I wouldn't have to do any swearing by or on anything to refuse to take such actions. Doing so seems to be a pointless exercise in claiming that you'd never, EVER, do any of those horrible things which you think the opposing political party is going to do to everyone despite being horrible. That sound stupid? Good, it was intended to. Because this crap is. This country advanced because of people actually doing things, not pledging they wouldn't do something.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Yet after the war that we won, we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology that your country could not achieve.
Ah, so you never read where I pointed out I am American a while back. But where does this have anything to do with pointing out this is little more than another blob of paranoid drivel. Now, I'm not sure about you, but I wouldn't have to do any swearing by or on anything to refuse to take such actions. Doing so seems to be a pointless exercise in claiming that you'd never, EVER, do any of those horrible things which you think the opposing political party is going to do to everyone despite being horrible. That sound stupid? Good, it was intended to. Because this crap is. This country advanced because of people actually doing things, not pledging they wouldn't do something.
Distind wrote:
I am American
You are not worthy of carrying the title of American, Idiot perhaps, but not American.
-
Probably the gun confiscation after people started shooting at the rescuers because they wanted to be picked up.
OK - I notice he didn't even reply. I didn't know about that, but I do wonder if these oathkeepers would have kept their oath if it meant getting shot at ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
Why aren't they a partisan organization?
What purpose would that serve?
About as much as they serve today ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Distind wrote:
I am American
You are not worthy of carrying the title of American, Idiot perhaps, but not American.
So if you were in charge, he'd be kicked out ? Totalitarianism is OK if it follows your rules ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
Why aren't they a partisan organization?
What purpose would that serve?
Every purpose. I'm surprised you don't already know. Maybe you should look up "non-partisan".
-
After reading some history, particularly some of the diary excerpts and letters from British troops and Americans, your comments remind of some of the stupid British. Yet after the war that we won, we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology that your country could not achieve. Now we face a similar situation involving your type of mindset.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
we rapidly developed into a powerful and wealthy industrial nation leading the way in scientific discoveries and new technology
Something you'll never make a contribution to. It's people like you that are putting the country in the crapper.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
-
OK - I notice he didn't even reply. I didn't know about that, but I do wonder if these oathkeepers would have kept their oath if it meant getting shot at ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
It was a rumor that some idiots shot at a rescue helicopter. If that story was true, then those idiots were criminal in their actions and should have either been shot or arrested. To use that as an excuse to go door to door and forcefully search occupied homes and confiscate the personal property of all citizens is illegal and unnecessary.
-
Every purpose. I'm surprised you don't already know. Maybe you should look up "non-partisan".
In political science, nonpartisan denotes an election, event or organization in which the participants do not declare or do not formally have a political party affiliation. Not partisan; free from party affiliation, bias, or designation.[1] Non-partisan democracy (also no-party democracy) is a system of representative government or organization such that universal and periodic elections take place without reference to political parties. Again, why would they want to be partisan? What purpose would that serve?
-
About as much as they serve today ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
About as much as they serve today ?
About as much as your intelligence serves?
-
It was a rumor that some idiots shot at a rescue helicopter. If that story was true, then those idiots were criminal in their actions and should have either been shot or arrested. To use that as an excuse to go door to door and forcefully search occupied homes and confiscate the personal property of all citizens is illegal and unnecessary.
So, in other words, they should have done nothing ? Or, sitting in your armchair, NOT being shot at, you think you can second guess what these people should have done when both their lives and the lives of the people they were trying to rescue, were endangered ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
About as much as they serve today ?
About as much as your intelligence serves?
Are you saying that I am very intelligent, or that the Oath Keepers are useless ? Not sure which interpretation I'd prefer, but both are OK for different reasons.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
So, in other words, they should have done nothing ? Or, sitting in your armchair, NOT being shot at, you think you can second guess what these people should have done when both their lives and the lives of the people they were trying to rescue, were endangered ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
They should have gone after the criminals, instead of illegally seizing the property that rightfully belongs to the people that were bunkered down in their homes for safety as the looters ran wild and shot at rescuers. Its the same old story from you...disarm the innocent, sterilize the good, demonize the moral, and maim the children. End of discussion, go jack off to the thought of billions of dead carbon criminals like you always do.