Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Royal Mail Recall

Royal Mail Recall

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
testingbeta-testing
13 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Russell Jones

    Royal Mail have created a stamp displaying a picture of Gordon Brown. Unfortunately, the stamp was not sticking to envelopes. This enraged the Prime Minister, who demanded a full investigation. After a month of testing and spending of £1.1million, a special commission presented the following findings: 1. The stamp is in perfect order. 2. There is nothing wrong with the adhesive. 3. People are spitting on the wrong side of the stamp

    modified on Friday, December 11, 2009 8:59 AM

    R Offline
    R Offline
    R Giskard Reventlov
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Brilliant.

    me, me, me

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R R Giskard Reventlov

      Brilliant.

      me, me, me

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterchen
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      When I first heard it, it took some guts to tell it.

      Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
      | FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P peterchen

        When I first heard it, it took some guts to tell it.

        Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
        | FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server

        R Offline
        R Offline
        R Giskard Reventlov
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Go on, I'll bite: why did it take some guts to tell?

        me, me, me

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Russell Jones

          Royal Mail have created a stamp displaying a picture of Gordon Brown. Unfortunately, the stamp was not sticking to envelopes. This enraged the Prime Minister, who demanded a full investigation. After a month of testing and spending of £1.1million, a special commission presented the following findings: 1. The stamp is in perfect order. 2. There is nothing wrong with the adhesive. 3. People are spitting on the wrong side of the stamp

          modified on Friday, December 11, 2009 8:59 AM

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Luc Pattyn
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Now that can be solved quite easily: have the image on both sides, glue on both sides too, and charge double as you now can use such stamps twice. :)

          Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]


          I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages


          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Russell Jones

            Royal Mail have created a stamp displaying a picture of Gordon Brown. Unfortunately, the stamp was not sticking to envelopes. This enraged the Prime Minister, who demanded a full investigation. After a month of testing and spending of £1.1million, a special commission presented the following findings: 1. The stamp is in perfect order. 2. There is nothing wrong with the adhesive. 3. People are spitting on the wrong side of the stamp

            modified on Friday, December 11, 2009 8:59 AM

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Sean Cundiff
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Does that mean you're licking his backside when you lick the, um, back side? ;P The real question here is: Why are you Brits still using stamps that require licking?

            -Sean ---- Fire Nuts

            R 0 S S 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • R R Giskard Reventlov

              Go on, I'll bite: why did it take some guts to tell?

              me, me, me

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Russell Jones
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              It would be a different joke if Erich Honecker were the target of your humour.

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Sean Cundiff

                Does that mean you're licking his backside when you lick the, um, back side? ;P The real question here is: Why are you Brits still using stamps that require licking?

                -Sean ---- Fire Nuts

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Russell Jones
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                The unions behind the post office don't like progress in any form (apart from progress towards oblivion).

                0 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Sean Cundiff

                  Does that mean you're licking his backside when you lick the, um, back side? ;P The real question here is: Why are you Brits still using stamps that require licking?

                  -Sean ---- Fire Nuts

                  0 Offline
                  0 Offline
                  0x3c0
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Because if the Royal Mail allowed non-lickable stamps, the CWU would view it as a modernisation and go on strike :laugh:

                  OSDev :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Russell Jones

                    The unions behind the post office don't like progress in any form (apart from progress towards oblivion).

                    0 Offline
                    0 Offline
                    0x3c0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Just beat me to it

                    OSDev :)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Sean Cundiff

                      Does that mean you're licking his backside when you lick the, um, back side? ;P The real question here is: Why are you Brits still using stamps that require licking?

                      -Sean ---- Fire Nuts

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Single Step Debugger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Addiction?

                      The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Sean Cundiff

                        Does that mean you're licking his backside when you lick the, um, back side? ;P The real question here is: Why are you Brits still using stamps that require licking?

                        -Sean ---- Fire Nuts

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Steve Mayfield
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        easy way to get DNA without saying your creating a DNA database for everyone???? Envelope contents: Name / Address / Fingerprints / DNA ... oh is there something else that they are use for :rolleyes:

                        Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Russell Jones

                          It would be a different joke if Erich Honecker were the target of your humour.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          peterchen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          It's strange - I know I'm better off, but also, the joke lost its bite. On a lighter note, xkcd[^].

                          Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
                          | FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups