Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. New RCA L40FHD41 LCD TV

New RCA L40FHD41 LCD TV

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
lampquestionlearningworkspace
19 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR realJSOP

    When our DLP TV's lamp went out yesterday, my wife decided (without any prompting from me) to get a new LCD TV for the bedroom, along with an upscaling DVD player. Since I am in the process of becoming deathly ill, I sent her out and had her call me so I could research the equipment on the web that she was considering for purchase. The wife brought home a RCA L40FHD41, and when we set it up, we found the following: 0) Price - $548 (at Wal-Mart) - that's damn good for such a large (40-inch) LCD TV. 1) The TV's setup functionality is basically crap. There is a Menu button on the remote, and this allows you to go through some setup stuff. This setup stuff does NOT include the screen format ((how wide the incoming display signal is). For that setting, you have to click the Format button. I still don't know if it's going to auto-adjust depending on the signal, or if we're going to have to do that manually. 2) There is no way to remove unused sources from the Input menu. To watch a DVD, we have to scroll down SEVEN items to get to "HDMI 1". I would have alternately settled for being able to configure the list so that the things we use are right next to each other, but that's not possible either. Also, if you're at the top of the list, you can't push the UP button and go to the bottom (the menu doesn't wrap). 3) The DirecTV remote (and from what I gather, MANY/ALL generic learning remotes) are not compatible with the TV. The codes provided by DirecTV simply don't work, and using their "search for codes" feature (or web page) doesn't contain anything that will work. This means we need the DirecTV remote to turn on the satellite box and change channels, but the TV's remote for power/sound. What a pain. 4) I told my wife that we would get a better picture if we got a HD satellite box, and she said we could wait for a while, and I agreed. Then, she saw the picture (we were watching Discovery Channel, which is available in HD). Her exact comment was "What good is it to get a 40-inch TV if we're not gonna have a 40-inch picture?". We'll be getting a HD satellite box next week. :)

    .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
    -----
    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
    -----
    "The staggering layers o

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Good - we put the main chip in their boxes :-D

    Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      WTF are you talking about?

      .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
      -----
      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

      D Offline
      D Offline
      dan sh
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      I mean does that TV has the capability to show 3d stuff?

      50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!

      realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D dan sh

        I mean does that TV has the capability to show 3d stuff?

        50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        No.

        .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
        -----
        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
        -----
        "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Gary R Wheeler

          You mean these[^]? Strike 1: Their stupid web site sizes itself to approximately 200% of the width of my screen. Strike 2: Their cheapest model is $99.95. Given that my wife destroys remotes in amount of time indirectly proportional to either their (A) price or (B) difficulty of replacement, I'm not willing to spend more than about $25-$35 for a remote control. Strike 3: Strike 1 really pisses me off. I had to set the IE page zoom to 50% to be able to see the whole thing, at which point I could no longer read the text. Morons.

          Software Zen: delete this;
          Fold With Us![^]

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Losinger
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

          Their stupid web site sizes itself to approximately 200% of the width of my screen.

          ok. but the remote isn't a web site.

          Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

          Their cheapest model is $99.95.

          $68.95[^]. you can probably find them even cheaper.

          Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

          I'm not willing to spend more than about $25-$35 for a remote control.

          i think the Logitechs work better than the cheaper brands. YMMV.

          image processing toolkits | batch image processing

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • realJSOPR realJSOP

            I dislike the fact that I have to connect to their web site at all. It takes forever to update the remote with your configuration, and nine times out of ten, you've done something wrong and have to go through the entrie thing all over again. Oh yeah, their remote isn't aware that there are two HDMI inputs on my DLP TV.

            .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
            -----
            "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
            -----
            "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Losinger
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

            It takes forever to update the remote with your configuration

            it takes a few minutes, sure. but you only need to do that when you're changing hardware.

            John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

            and nine times out of ten, you've done something wrong

            a 90% user error rate isn't really Logitech's fault.

            image processing toolkits | batch image processing

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

              Their stupid web site sizes itself to approximately 200% of the width of my screen.

              ok. but the remote isn't a web site.

              Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

              Their cheapest model is $99.95.

              $68.95[^]. you can probably find them even cheaper.

              Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

              I'm not willing to spend more than about $25-$35 for a remote control.

              i think the Logitechs work better than the cheaper brands. YMMV.

              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

              G Offline
              G Offline
              Gary R Wheeler
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              My constraint on price is based upon my wife's ability to destroy the things.

              Software Zen: delete this;
              Fold With Us![^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Losinger

                ever try the Logitech universal remotes ? i've never run into anything mine can't handle (even though i've had to manually 'train' it on a couple of things).

                image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jorgen Sigvardsson
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                I agree with you. I have one of those remotes, and they work great. The few times an odd device isn't part of the collective database, you can always train it yourself without much hassle. The only thing I have to complain about is their software for managing the remote. The software is shaky at best...

                -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Good - we put the main chip in their boxes :-D

                  Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Meaning: any discrepancy in the video processing, and John can send you a bug report? ;)

                  -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                    Meaning: any discrepancy in the video processing, and John can send you a bug report? ;)

                    -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Yes - on my toll email address. $20 per message ;P

                    Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Yes - on my toll email address. $20 per message ;P

                      Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      RichardM1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      On your Troll emain account? :)

                      Opacity, the new Transparency.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups