Fastest USB Thumb drive ?
-
Has anyone got any decent performance data upon which to base comparisons? I'd like a 16GB drive to use for short-term backup - right now my various C***** and K***** units apparently perform miserably. Any recommendations - pref. based on numbers welcomed. Windows 7 x86. Incidentally HD_Speed (no affiliation) shows a 10x increase in performance if the drive in question is plugged directly into a USB2 port rather than living at the end of a USB extender cable .... Thx++ Jerry
-
Has anyone got any decent performance data upon which to base comparisons? I'd like a 16GB drive to use for short-term backup - right now my various C***** and K***** units apparently perform miserably. Any recommendations - pref. based on numbers welcomed. Windows 7 x86. Incidentally HD_Speed (no affiliation) shows a 10x increase in performance if the drive in question is plugged directly into a USB2 port rather than living at the end of a USB extender cable .... Thx++ Jerry
Hi, 1. I did some measurements on memory sticks I had around: Measured on Dell Inspiron 1720 (2.4GHz Vista) with HD_Speed old Sony 256MB reads 5.3MB/s SanDisk Cruzer Micro 512MB reads 7.3MB/s Sony Cruzer 1GB reads 12MB/sec old Medion 256MB reads 12MB/sec Philips 4GB reads 13MB/sec Sony Cruzer 16GB reads 22MB/sec Kingston DataTraveler 4GB reads 25MB/sec 2. Newer models seem to be (bigger and) faster. 3. IMO large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price. 4. beware Emtec; they have a bad reliability reputation around here. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that.
[The QA section does it automatically, when do we get it on regular forums?]
-
Hi, 1. I did some measurements on memory sticks I had around: Measured on Dell Inspiron 1720 (2.4GHz Vista) with HD_Speed old Sony 256MB reads 5.3MB/s SanDisk Cruzer Micro 512MB reads 7.3MB/s Sony Cruzer 1GB reads 12MB/sec old Medion 256MB reads 12MB/sec Philips 4GB reads 13MB/sec Sony Cruzer 16GB reads 22MB/sec Kingston DataTraveler 4GB reads 25MB/sec 2. Newer models seem to be (bigger and) faster. 3. IMO large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price. 4. beware Emtec; they have a bad reliability reputation around here. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that.
[The QA section does it automatically, when do we get it on regular forums?]
Luc Pattyn wrote:
large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price.
Yup, Sony is expensive when you compare the price to others. Could be these drives last longer?
There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't.
modified on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:46 AM
-
Has anyone got any decent performance data upon which to base comparisons? I'd like a 16GB drive to use for short-term backup - right now my various C***** and K***** units apparently perform miserably. Any recommendations - pref. based on numbers welcomed. Windows 7 x86. Incidentally HD_Speed (no affiliation) shows a 10x increase in performance if the drive in question is plugged directly into a USB2 port rather than living at the end of a USB extender cable .... Thx++ Jerry
We use OCZ Rally2 devices and can recommend them. I'm waiting for the 256GB version, myself though. SSD capacities are getting there, slowly... :rolleyes:
Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"
-
Has anyone got any decent performance data upon which to base comparisons? I'd like a 16GB drive to use for short-term backup - right now my various C***** and K***** units apparently perform miserably. Any recommendations - pref. based on numbers welcomed. Windows 7 x86. Incidentally HD_Speed (no affiliation) shows a 10x increase in performance if the drive in question is plugged directly into a USB2 port rather than living at the end of a USB extender cable .... Thx++ Jerry
Looking forward to the day When Microsoft produce a truly portable OS on a USB, I cant see this being a far off.
-
Luc Pattyn wrote:
large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price.
Yup, Sony is expensive when you compare the price to others. Could be these drives last longer?
There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't.
modified on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:46 AM
Abhinav S wrote:
Could be these drives last longer?
I'm doubting that, you pay a tax for the brandname.
-
Luc Pattyn wrote:
large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price.
Yup, Sony is expensive when you compare the price to others. Could be these drives last longer?
There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't.
modified on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:46 AM
Abhinav S wrote:
Yup, Sony is expensive when you compare the price to others.
And you never know what kind of software payload comes on the Sony units...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Luc Pattyn wrote:
large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price.
Yup, Sony is expensive when you compare the price to others. Could be these drives last longer?
There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't.
modified on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:46 AM
Abhinav S wrote:
Could be these drives last longer?
Who cares really? You'll probably end up replacing it with a faster and bigger model about the time it conks out. I still have a 128 MB device and NEVER use it. The only reason my wife hasn't made me throw it out is because she probably has no idea what it is :)
-
Luc Pattyn wrote:
large manufacturers (such as Sony) have several lines, with at least one of them aimed at performance; which gets reflected in price.
Yup, Sony is expensive when you compare the price to others. Could be these drives last longer?
There are only 10 types of people in this world — those who understand binary, and those who don't.
modified on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:46 AM
-
We use OCZ Rally2 devices and can recommend them. I'm waiting for the 256GB version, myself though. SSD capacities are getting there, slowly... :rolleyes:
Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"
-
Has anyone got any decent performance data upon which to base comparisons? I'd like a 16GB drive to use for short-term backup - right now my various C***** and K***** units apparently perform miserably. Any recommendations - pref. based on numbers welcomed. Windows 7 x86. Incidentally HD_Speed (no affiliation) shows a 10x increase in performance if the drive in question is plugged directly into a USB2 port rather than living at the end of a USB extender cable .... Thx++ Jerry
With USB 3.0 around the corner, I'm waiting to buy a high capacity thumb drive. And there's always eSata; wonder if anyone will figure out how to make a thumb-like drive for that.
