Would you take a "false" promotion?
-
Would you take a "false" promotion? i.e. one without a raise, or without increment corresponding title or without relevant authority to fire/hire/review salary/appraisal All there is is responsiblity to "look after" the new unit, and "be responsible"? I've seen so many powerless team leads and unit managers that such arrangement seems to be quite standard these days.
dev
Sounds like marriage. All the responsibility, and none of the authority! ;) Marc
-
Would you take a "false" promotion? i.e. one without a raise, or without increment corresponding title or without relevant authority to fire/hire/review salary/appraisal All there is is responsiblity to "look after" the new unit, and "be responsible"? I've seen so many powerless team leads and unit managers that such arrangement seems to be quite standard these days.
dev
It's nothing new. I was appointed "technical coordinator" (aka, lead engineer) for a group of 8 engineers while I was still in school. No authority, less pay than the rest, and all the responsibility for maikng the project work. That was over 30 years ago, and kids are still falling for it. :laugh:
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
It's nothing new. I was appointed "technical coordinator" (aka, lead engineer) for a group of 8 engineers while I was still in school. No authority, less pay than the rest, and all the responsibility for maikng the project work. That was over 30 years ago, and kids are still falling for it. :laugh:
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
devvvy wrote:
Would you take a "false" promotion?
Do you have a choice? The only other choice you have is to look for a different job.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Sounds like marriage. All the responsibility, and none of the authority! ;) Marc
-
Would you take a "false" promotion? i.e. one without a raise, or without increment corresponding title or without relevant authority to fire/hire/review salary/appraisal All there is is responsiblity to "look after" the new unit, and "be responsible"? I've seen so many powerless team leads and unit managers that such arrangement seems to be quite standard these days.
dev
-
"Of course, it's all about Team Work" - another standard corporate bullshxt invented by ladies in HR
dev
couldn't agree more. When I think of their IQ(the HR laddies)... it makes me wanna throw a
System.Terrorright on their computers. But i would have to undo it :( [added] But then again they are paid to be calm, polite, and to smile while fireing some poor guys/gals .... Hate them. I really do. Can't stand them. :mad: From the heart of my bottom :) [/added]modified on Sunday, April 11, 2010 5:27 AM
-
It's nothing new. I was appointed "technical coordinator" (aka, lead engineer) for a group of 8 engineers while I was still in school. No authority, less pay than the rest, and all the responsibility for maikng the project work. That was over 30 years ago, and kids are still falling for it. :laugh:
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
Would you take a "false" promotion? i.e. one without a raise, or without increment corresponding title or without relevant authority to fire/hire/review salary/appraisal All there is is responsiblity to "look after" the new unit, and "be responsible"? I've seen so many powerless team leads and unit managers that such arrangement seems to be quite standard these days.
dev
-
I'd keep my eye open for a job somewhere else. A company that does that doesn't inspire loyalty from me.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
-
Would you take a "false" promotion? i.e. one without a raise, or without increment corresponding title or without relevant authority to fire/hire/review salary/appraisal All there is is responsiblity to "look after" the new unit, and "be responsible"? I've seen so many powerless team leads and unit managers that such arrangement seems to be quite standard these days.
dev
That's not a promotion; that's merely someone who is shifting with responsibilities. There's the question "why" these responsibilities need to shift, and the question why they think that you're going to do something extra without any form of compensation therefore. How would this person feel if you asked for more salary without doing any extra work? :)
I are Troll :suss:
-
That's not a promotion; that's merely someone who is shifting with responsibilities. There's the question "why" these responsibilities need to shift, and the question why they think that you're going to do something extra without any form of compensation therefore. How would this person feel if you asked for more salary without doing any extra work? :)
I are Troll :suss:
-
What's wrong with that? Senior executives makes much more just making decision - that's the extra work?
dev
devvvy wrote:
What's wrong with that? Senior executives makes much more just making decision - that's the extra work?
The question was about getting more responsibility; it implied no extra influence. There's also a slight difference in the perception of the workload on those decisions. Someone might be thinking that they're doing you a favor if you get to choose - not realising that the decision requires arguments and extra documentation. The point I'm making is that it is work that they're handing out, not just influence.
I are Troll :suss:
-
But this is such normal practice. It's the norm of businesses, how they operate. Just like the bullshit with Multi-tasking (aka Many-Tasking) Your boss must be thinking you have very limited social intelligence to accept an "Offer" such as this.
dev
-
devvvy wrote:
What's wrong with that? Senior executives makes much more just making decision - that's the extra work?
The question was about getting more responsibility; it implied no extra influence. There's also a slight difference in the perception of the workload on those decisions. Someone might be thinking that they're doing you a favor if you get to choose - not realising that the decision requires arguments and extra documentation. The point I'm making is that it is work that they're handing out, not just influence.
I are Troll :suss:
-
Roger Wright wrote:
still in school. No authority, less pay
You were still better off than me. I was never paid in school. :)
I had no choice in the matter. If I didn't work, I couldn't go to school. ;P
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
-
Would you take a "false" promotion? i.e. one without a raise, or without increment corresponding title or without relevant authority to fire/hire/review salary/appraisal All there is is responsiblity to "look after" the new unit, and "be responsible"? I've seen so many powerless team leads and unit managers that such arrangement seems to be quite standard these days.
dev
As others say, do you have a choice? If its work you'd like to do; or could lead to something you think is better (pay and our authority) after proving yourself, why not? Get an agreement about what it would take to get what you want. Note if you're "responsible", you want some way to get your decisions enforced through your authority or management backup...