Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. VS 2010 - what are the shiny parts?

VS 2010 - what are the shiny parts?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
visual-studiocomquestioncareer
51 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christopher Duncan

    I like stuff that's new and shiny just like any other geek (after all, I just upgraded to Windows 7 which is nothing but shiny). However, I've also spent a lot of money on MS upgrades over the years that really brought little new to the party. And so, I ask the more experienced among you:

    • What makes purchasing VS 2010 worthwhile?
    • Can I do things with it that I can't do in VS 2008?
    • Does it come in a hyper intelligent shade of the color blue?

    Christopher Duncan
    www.PracticalUSA.com
    Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
    Copywriting Services

    M Offline
    M Offline
    MrZaggy
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Well I'll have to get back to you on the good bits... The VS2010PROMSDN download is at 95% now... :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P PIEBALDconsult

      Christopher Duncan wrote:

      what are the shiny parts?"

      I suppose the surfaces of the disc, maybe the packaging.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Muhammad Gouda
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      By shiny, they mean the best parts. So, I may say, the splash screen :)

      foreach(Minute m in MyLife) myExperience++;

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Johann Gerell

        Judah Himango wrote:

        Nice to just have it baked-in, ya know?

        And you think, based on history, that the MS implementation is less bulky than the ones in Visual Assist (my choice!), ReSharper and CodeRush? ;)

        Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mike Winiberg
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        So - let me get this straight - the new features in VS2010 are things that have been available in my editor (Slickedit) since the days of VS2005? Hmm, perhaps I'll stick with VS2008 until I see a need to change (or MS offer it to me free) :laugh:

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Christopher Duncan

          I like stuff that's new and shiny just like any other geek (after all, I just upgraded to Windows 7 which is nothing but shiny). However, I've also spent a lot of money on MS upgrades over the years that really brought little new to the party. And so, I ask the more experienced among you:

          • What makes purchasing VS 2010 worthwhile?
          • Can I do things with it that I can't do in VS 2008?
          • Does it come in a hyper intelligent shade of the color blue?

          Christopher Duncan
          www.PracticalUSA.com
          Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
          Copywriting Services

          R Offline
          R Offline
          realJSOP
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          There are no shiny parts... because you can't polish a turd.

          .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
          -----
          "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
          -----
          "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Steve Mayfield

            surfaces of the disc just the underside of the disc(s) ;) (there are also really tiny holes)

            Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Alexander DiMauro
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            But I got the .iso download...no shiny disc with tiny holes... :sigh:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H hairy_hats

              Kevin McFarlane wrote:

              This appears to have been copied

              Well it is an MS product.

              K Offline
              K Offline
              Kevin McFarlane
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              viaducting wrote:

              Well it is an MS product

              Reminds me of Larry Ellison's (Oracle) quip about MS. "Microsoft's idea of innovation is to copy it and add it to Windows." Substitute Visual Studio for Windows. :) Actually, I don't mind that a software vendor copies, so long as it's a good implementation.

              Kevin

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christopher Duncan

                I like stuff that's new and shiny just like any other geek (after all, I just upgraded to Windows 7 which is nothing but shiny). However, I've also spent a lot of money on MS upgrades over the years that really brought little new to the party. And so, I ask the more experienced among you:

                • What makes purchasing VS 2010 worthwhile?
                • Can I do things with it that I can't do in VS 2008?
                • Does it come in a hyper intelligent shade of the color blue?

                Christopher Duncan
                www.PracticalUSA.com
                Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                Copywriting Services

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                Parts that glitter dont work & those that work does not glitter

                Ravie Busie Coding is my birth-right and bugs are part of feature my code has! _________________________________________ Me  Facebook  Twitter

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R realJSOP

                  There are no shiny parts... because you can't polish a turd.

                  .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
                  -----
                  "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                  -----
                  "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                  You can't polish a turd...

                  ...but you can roll it in glitter.

                  Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                    Christopher Duncan wrote:

                    What makes purchasing VS 2010 worthwhile?

                    Well, I can tell you why we're upgrading later this week: One thing I'm looking forward to, from an IDE and tooling perspective, is preventing bugs with Pex and tracking down bugs with IntelliTrace (aka Historical Debugging).

                    Christopher Duncan wrote:

                    Can I do things with it that I can't do in VS 2008?

                    Sure. Multi-monitor support, for example. This means you can have, for example, code file Foo.cs opened in one monitor, with Bar.cs opened on the other monitor. Another thing I like is Navigate To feature. In VS 2008, if I wanted to find a class or function or code file, I'd hit CTRL+F, search for a few seconds, then find the proper match in the search results. In 2010, I can hit CTRL+, and a "find as you type" tool window will find classes, functions, fields, etc, letting you navigate directly from there. It also works with PascalCasing, so typing in "SED" will find members with ShowEmailDialog in the name.

                    Christopher Duncan wrote:

                    Does it come in a hyper intelligent shade of the color blue?

                    :)

                    Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
                    Judah Himango

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    pg az
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    Judah Himango wrote:

                    tracking down bugs with IntelliTrace (aka Historical Debugging).

                    As-advertised, IntelliTrace simply won't work with C++, oh well.

                    pg--az

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mike Winiberg

                      So - let me get this straight - the new features in VS2010 are things that have been available in my editor (Slickedit) since the days of VS2005? Hmm, perhaps I'll stick with VS2008 until I see a need to change (or MS offer it to me free) :laugh:

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      I've been playing with 2010 in a VM. It's fine, but to me it isn't really an upgrade right now. I just moved from VS2005 to 2008 recently. Think I'll stay put for now. I'm getting a little tired of upgrading all the time. Used to make sense, but the stuff is so feature-laden now as it is that I find it difficult to justify the expense when I'm not using all the features as it is. Know what I mean? -Max

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P pg az

                        Judah Himango wrote:

                        tracking down bugs with IntelliTrace (aka Historical Debugging).

                        As-advertised, IntelliTrace simply won't work with C++, oh well.

                        pg--az

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Judah Gabriel Himango
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        Right. Which is fine by me, since I almost never do native development anymore.

                        Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
                        Judah Himango

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Johann Gerell

                          Judah Himango wrote:

                          Nice to just have it baked-in, ya know?

                          And you think, based on history, that the MS implementation is less bulky than the ones in Visual Assist (my choice!), ReSharper and CodeRush? ;)

                          Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time - Bertrand Russel

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Judah Gabriel Himango
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #37

                          Try it and see for yourself. With 3rd party add-ins, you'll end up running into OoME. I believe some of the 3rd party add-ins even have workarounds for this. When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat. And I don't have to buy a 3rd party add-in to boot.

                          Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
                          Judah Himango

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christopher Duncan

                            I like stuff that's new and shiny just like any other geek (after all, I just upgraded to Windows 7 which is nothing but shiny). However, I've also spent a lot of money on MS upgrades over the years that really brought little new to the party. And so, I ask the more experienced among you:

                            • What makes purchasing VS 2010 worthwhile?
                            • Can I do things with it that I can't do in VS 2008?
                            • Does it come in a hyper intelligent shade of the color blue?

                            Christopher Duncan
                            www.PracticalUSA.com
                            Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                            Copywriting Services

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            It has much better integration with Entity Framework. For example, you can add/edit Complex types right in the Visual Designer instead of resorting to the XML files.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris Losinger

                              without it, you're not a true MS fan.

                              image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                              E Offline
                              E Offline
                              Earl Truss
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              "it"? You mean the sarcasm?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Christopher Duncan

                                I like stuff that's new and shiny just like any other geek (after all, I just upgraded to Windows 7 which is nothing but shiny). However, I've also spent a lot of money on MS upgrades over the years that really brought little new to the party. And so, I ask the more experienced among you:

                                • What makes purchasing VS 2010 worthwhile?
                                • Can I do things with it that I can't do in VS 2008?
                                • Does it come in a hyper intelligent shade of the color blue?

                                Christopher Duncan
                                www.PracticalUSA.com
                                Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                                Copywriting Services

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                TheyCallMeMrJames
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #40

                                I am liking VS2010 for the better IntelliSense (especially with javascript/jquery), the tooling refresh (particularly ASP.NET MVC and the Silverlight/WPF experience), multi-targeting, the better deploy/publish paradigm for web-based projects. I use multi-monitor support daily. I like the debug experience a lot better. If you haven't tried watch-variable pinning yet you'll certainly enjoy that. Pex looks like the solution to the 70% of code that we can't find budget for to write tests. The WPF-based code-editor is great for moving around in the code file. Block-shaped editing is awesome. When editing, you also get better visibility and highlighting of tokens/classes/params/etc (when your caret is in one, it lights up all other instances in the class file). Those are some...I've been using it for quite some time so it's hard to remember what isn't there in 2008. As for comments around 'upgrading all the time'...two times in five years isn't by any means 'all the time'. I would suggest that anyone not using the tools available from one version to the next is either maintaining legacy code or stuck in their ways and not willing to spend the time to learn new, valuable career skills. Cheers, -jc

                                They Call me Mister James

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R RugbyLeague

                                  The WPF and Silverlight designers are much better - but I rather like typing xaml so I am not sure how much use I will get from them.

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  TheyCallMeMrJames
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #41

                                  If you prefer editing the XAML you'll really enjoy the better editing story with IntelliSense improvements. Cheers, -jc

                                  They Call me Mister James

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T TheyCallMeMrJames

                                    If you prefer editing the XAML you'll really enjoy the better editing story with IntelliSense improvements. Cheers, -jc

                                    They Call me Mister James

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    RugbyLeague
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #42

                                    I hope so - the intellisense in the VS2008 XAML editor often freezes - typing in "

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                                      Try it and see for yourself. With 3rd party add-ins, you'll end up running into OoME. I believe some of the 3rd party add-ins even have workarounds for this. When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat. And I don't have to buy a 3rd party add-in to boot.

                                      Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
                                      Judah Himango

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      ghle
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #43

                                      Judah Himango wrote:

                                      When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat.

                                      Boy, talk about subtle sarcasm. ;)

                                      Gary

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G ghle

                                        Judah Himango wrote:

                                        When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat.

                                        Boy, talk about subtle sarcasm. ;)

                                        Gary

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Judah Gabriel Himango
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #44

                                        Nope. Try it yourself: VS without Resharper and with. See what kind of performance and memory usage you get.

                                        Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
                                        Judah Himango

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                                          Nope. Try it yourself: VS without Resharper and with. See what kind of performance and memory usage you get.

                                          Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
                                          Judah Himango

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          ghle
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #45

                                          The sarcasim was ANY Microsoft software without Overhead. I don't think it exists - anywhere. It is always bloated. :) And slow....

                                          Gary

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups