VS 2010 - what are the shiny parts?
-
The WPF and Silverlight designers are much better - but I rather like typing xaml so I am not sure how much use I will get from them.
If you prefer editing the XAML you'll really enjoy the better editing story with IntelliSense improvements. Cheers, -jc
-
If you prefer editing the XAML you'll really enjoy the better editing story with IntelliSense improvements. Cheers, -jc
I hope so - the intellisense in the VS2008 XAML editor often freezes - typing in "
-
Try it and see for yourself. With 3rd party add-ins, you'll end up running into OoME. I believe some of the 3rd party add-ins even have workarounds for this. When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat. And I don't have to buy a 3rd party add-in to boot.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah Himango -
Judah Himango wrote:
When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat.
Boy, talk about subtle sarcasm. ;)
Gary
Nope. Try it yourself: VS without Resharper and with. See what kind of performance and memory usage you get.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah Himango -
Nope. Try it yourself: VS without Resharper and with. See what kind of performance and memory usage you get.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah Himango -
I find it a little ironic (and possibly amusing) that the first component on it's list to download/install is the "Microsoft Application Error Reporting" component, whatever that is. :)
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
If I wanted longer coffee breaks, I would have stayed with C++. :)
Christopher Duncan
www.PracticalUSA.com
Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
Copywriting Services -
The sarcasim was ANY Microsoft software without Overhead. I don't think it exists - anywhere. It is always bloated. :) And slow....
Gary
Yeah, but I didn't say "zero overhead". Nobody writes software with zero overhead. Instead, I said, "less overhead than loading a large 3rd party add-in".
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah Himango -
Yeah, but I didn't say "zero overhead". Nobody writes software with zero overhead. Instead, I said, "less overhead than loading a large 3rd party add-in".
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah Himango -
Yes, but the "large 3rd party add-in" would be smaller and faster than the MS built-in feature. It's all relative.
Gary
No, it isn't. Try using Resharpher on a large solution. Now try with VS2010. See it for yourself.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah Himango -
No, it isn't. Try using Resharpher on a large solution. Now try with VS2010. See it for yourself.
Religiously blogging on the intarwebs since the early 21st century: Kineti L'Tziyon
Judah HimangoJudah Himango wrote:
No, it isn't. Try using Resharpher on a large solution. Now try with VS2010. See it for yourself.
Judah Himango wrote:
Try it and see for yourself. With 3rd party add-ins, you'll end up running into OoME. I believe some of the 3rd party add-ins even have workarounds for this. When it's baked in, there's no overhead for the add-in. Less bloat. And I don't have to buy a 3rd party add-in to boot.
Okay Judah, I'll give you one bad add-in for one bloated application is possibly worse than MS build-in code. You made a generic statement about 3rd party apps, which is still wrong. But, from the resharper site: How ReSharper Helps Visual Studio Users Continuous code quality analysis in C#, XAML, XML, ASP.NET, and ASP.NET MVC. I don't program in those apps, so I have no need for resharper, I guess. Over and out.
Gary