Why VS2010 Sucks ©...
-
:)
cheers, Super ------------------------------------------ Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
Damn! Wish I'd thought of that, it's so much sexier! :laugh:
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
The I claim: Why VS2K10 Sucks© Why Visual Studio 2K10 Sucks© and y vs2K10 sux© [edit]I'll have it without an 'n' instead...][/edit]
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
:)
cheers, Super ------------------------------------------ Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
VS-MMX compiles to MMX instructions. :)
-
Just wanted to be first to say it... :) Note the copyright - don't anyone dare to use my line in future!
Isn't "Why * sucks" copyrighted by CG? Of course he is kind enough to let the other CPians use it every now and then. * - Replace with anything e.g. Windows, WPF, Telstra etc.
-
Damn! Wish I'd thought of that, it's so much sexier! :laugh:
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
Isn't "Why * sucks" copyrighted by CG? Of course he is kind enough to let the other CPians use it every now and then. * - Replace with anything e.g. Windows, WPF, Telstra etc.
-
Isn't "Why * sucks" copyrighted by CG? Of course he is kind enough to let the other CPians use it every now and then. * - Replace with anything e.g. Windows, WPF, Telstra etc.
Fortunately not - but only because he can't! (I found this on a copyright info site a while ago)
What isn't eligible
If a work is not tangible, copyright protection will not apply. This can lead to confusion, so here are a few categories not eligible for protection from copyright: 1. Works that are not fixed. For example, the statements made by experts at a round table discussion or a comedian's stage act. 2. Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans. These materials may be eligible for patent protection. 3. Ideas, procedures and methods.
"Why * sucks" is not fixed. "Why * sucks" is definately CG's slogan "Why * sucks" is very much CG 's main idea, and his main procedure!
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
Fortunately not - but only because he can't! (I found this on a copyright info site a while ago)
What isn't eligible
If a work is not tangible, copyright protection will not apply. This can lead to confusion, so here are a few categories not eligible for protection from copyright: 1. Works that are not fixed. For example, the statements made by experts at a round table discussion or a comedian's stage act. 2. Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans. These materials may be eligible for patent protection. 3. Ideas, procedures and methods.
"Why * sucks" is not fixed. "Why * sucks" is definately CG's slogan "Why * sucks" is very much CG 's main idea, and his main procedure!
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
OriginalGriff wrote:
the statements made by experts at a round table discussion or a comedian's stage act.
:laugh:
-
Just wanted to be first to say it... :) Note the copyright - don't anyone dare to use my line in future!
-
Fortunately not - but only because he can't! (I found this on a copyright info site a while ago)
What isn't eligible
If a work is not tangible, copyright protection will not apply. This can lead to confusion, so here are a few categories not eligible for protection from copyright: 1. Works that are not fixed. For example, the statements made by experts at a round table discussion or a comedian's stage act. 2. Titles, names, short phrases, and slogans. These materials may be eligible for patent protection. 3. Ideas, procedures and methods.
"Why * sucks" is not fixed. "Why * sucks" is definately CG's slogan "Why * sucks" is very much CG 's main idea, and his main procedure!
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
OriginalGriff wrote:
3. Ideas, procedures and methods.
That would automatically imply that Softwares and Algorithms are not copyright able and under certain light, it would also encompass downloadable software applications. Can you provide the original link please?
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
3. Ideas, procedures and methods.
That would automatically imply that Softwares and Algorithms are not copyright able and under certain light, it would also encompass downloadable software applications. Can you provide the original link please?
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
I can't remember the original link - it was some time ago, and I abstracted the bits I needed. I'll see if I can find any reference, but I don't hold out much hope. Software is copyrightable as a "literary work", (presumably since you can read it!) Methods and algorithms are not tangible, so they are not copyrightable - they may be patentable though.
You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
3. Ideas, procedures and methods.
That would automatically imply that Softwares and Algorithms are not copyright able and under certain light, it would also encompass downloadable software applications. Can you provide the original link please?
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
write and publish a book (a real one, one that requires some trees to die for you), or write an article and get it published in print. That gives you copyright. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
-
Isn't "Why * sucks" copyrighted by CG? Of course he is kind enough to let the other CPians use it every now and then. * - Replace with anything e.g. Windows, WPF, Telstra etc.
There's certainly mountains of evidence for prior usage....
