Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Science geek brain teasers

Science geek brain teasers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++phpdatabasecomgame-dev
77 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Maunder

    I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

    cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Phil Martin
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    The classic that is far too easy to google for now. If you have an aircraft on a conveyor belt. The air craft attempts to take off and the conveyor belt runs in the opposite direction matching the speed of the air craft. Does the plane take off?

    J D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Maunder

      I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

      cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Phil Martin
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      And the even more classic Monty Hall problem: Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

      J S A R 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Maunder

        Exactly. Gold elephant stamp for you.

        cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ian Shlasko
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        *checks his profile*... Bah, lies! ;P This reminds me of the good old days, writing violent flash games with ballistic trajectories...

        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
        Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Phil Martin

          The classic that is far too easy to google for now. If you have an aircraft on a conveyor belt. The air craft attempts to take off and the conveyor belt runs in the opposite direction matching the speed of the air craft. Does the plane take off?

          J Offline
          J Offline
          J Dunlap
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          It does, because the source of thrust is the air moving through the jet engines or propellers, not the wheels on the ground. The wheels will end up just spinning super fast. It might affect the speed of the aircraft a little due to friction, but not by enough to prevent takeoff.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

            cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Not Active
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            What is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?


            I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              Q. How many roads must a man walk down? :-D

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Steve Mayfield
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind ... Bob Dylan / Peter, Paul & Mary

              Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

                cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gregory Gadow
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Here's one from biological sciences: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? (And yes, there actually is a correct answer. ;P ) (For those outside the US, "woodchuck" is an American name for Marmota monax, better known as the groundhog.)

                P D 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • P Phil Martin

                  And the even more classic Monty Hall problem: Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jorgen Andersson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  You had one chance out of three that door number one had a car behind it which leaves 2/3 that it's behind one of the other doors. The fact that the host opens one door and shows you the goat doesn't change that fact. So picking door number two doubles your chances. It's a classic and possibly a repost I believe.

                  "When did ignorance become a point of view" - Dilbert

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Maunder

                    I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

                    cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Q. What alcohol and in what quantities will bring Mick to a stand still?

                    Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                    C P 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • P Phil Martin

                      And the even more classic Monty Hall problem: Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Sandeep Mewara
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Yes always switch... probability of winning has just doubled after what host has done... :cool:

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Maunder

                        I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

                        cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CPallini
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        You simply cannot do that. :)

                        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                        This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                        [My articles]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Maunder

                          I was thinking that there's enough geeks here - maths, computing, physics, you name it - that we could easily put together a bunch of questions that are answerable by most, but a little tricky. I'll start the ball rolling: Q. In a constant graviational field, how can you accelerate while keeping a steady speed? Hmm - just found braingle.com[^]. There goes a productive day...

                          cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jeron1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Q. How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J J Dunlap

                            It does, because the source of thrust is the air moving through the jet engines or propellers, not the wheels on the ground. The wheels will end up just spinning super fast. It might affect the speed of the aircraft a little due to friction, but not by enough to prevent takeoff.

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Dan Neely
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Wrong. The engines are moving it forward but the belt is moving it backwards at the same speed. As a result its net velocity is zero meaning the wings aren't generating lift so it stays put. The only way it could get aloft is if it's a helicopter/vtol/or it's a windy day and the AC is an ultralight with a takeoff velocity lower than the wind speed. Edit: ooops.

                            3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                            modified on Tuesday, May 4, 2010 3:53 PM

                            C R L S M 5 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • G Gregory Gadow

                              Here's one from biological sciences: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? (And yes, there actually is a correct answer. ;P ) (For those outside the US, "woodchuck" is an American name for Marmota monax, better known as the groundhog.)

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PJ Arends
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Gregory.Gadow wrote:

                              How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

                              A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as it could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.


                              You may be right I may be crazy -- Billy Joel -- Within you lies the power for good - Use it!

                              G 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G Gregory Gadow

                                Here's one from biological sciences: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? (And yes, there actually is a correct answer. ;P ) (For those outside the US, "woodchuck" is an American name for Marmota monax, better known as the groundhog.)

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Dan Neely
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                He'd chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Unfortunately for the freaks in Punxsutawney he can't. Flying log lobotomies all around would do that town a world of good. :laugh:

                                3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D Dan Neely

                                  Wrong. The engines are moving it forward but the belt is moving it backwards at the same speed. As a result its net velocity is zero meaning the wings aren't generating lift so it stays put. The only way it could get aloft is if it's a helicopter/vtol/or it's a windy day and the AC is an ultralight with a takeoff velocity lower than the wind speed. Edit: ooops.

                                  3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                                  modified on Tuesday, May 4, 2010 3:53 PM

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Christopher Duncan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  Or it fires one of its missles at the idiot running the conveyor belt.

                                  Christopher Duncan
                                  www.PracticalUSA.com
                                  Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes
                                  Copywriting Services

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P PJ Arends

                                    Gregory.Gadow wrote:

                                    How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

                                    A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as it could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.


                                    You may be right I may be crazy -- Billy Joel -- Within you lies the power for good - Use it!

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    Gregory Gadow
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Good! The answer I learned was slightly different: As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if he could chuck wood.

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J jeron1

                                      Q. How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      Gregory Gadow
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      Three.

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Dan Neely

                                        Wrong. The engines are moving it forward but the belt is moving it backwards at the same speed. As a result its net velocity is zero meaning the wings aren't generating lift so it stays put. The only way it could get aloft is if it's a helicopter/vtol/or it's a windy day and the AC is an ultralight with a takeoff velocity lower than the wind speed. Edit: ooops.

                                        3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                                        modified on Tuesday, May 4, 2010 3:53 PM

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        ragnaroknrol
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        Mythbusters launched an airplane using these conditions. He's right, the thing just takes off.

                                        If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                        Q 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Gregory Gadow

                                          Three.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jeron1
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          You're showing your age. ;)

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups