macs, what are those... [modified](death of mac he says)
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
The title alone tells me this is one more person who has no idea what an iPad is, or what it is for.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
Right now, you still need a computer to hook your iPad\iPhone up to in order to register it, back it up, transfer CDs onto it, get photos off it etc, etc. Possibly in 5-10 years time, when WiMax, with speeds of 100Mbits/s is everywhere, and your iTunes library is stored in the cloud, they may well discontinue Macs. Having said that, designers will still want to use Macs, because of having a proper keyboard and more importantly a mouse. I can't imagine trying to do fiddly design work using my sausage-like fingers.
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
The iPod line has been the star making Apple grow the most significantly since iTunes hit the PC. I recall reading in 2006 about how the Mac line was going to end because of the iPod. Again in 2009 because of the iPhone. I guess 2010 is time for the iPad to get this headline. Apple is not killing one of Steve Jobs' biggest babies (OSX is a repackaged NeXt OS with some improvements) and they aren't going to kill one of their most profitable divisions. In the really high end market ($1500+ per machine) Apple was dominant last I knew with over 80% of the market. That same market has the highest profit margin. (I'm not going to defend how much they cost, they had been competitive a few years ago but seem to be really putting the screws in of late. It's really insane right now.)
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
-
The title alone tells me this is one more person who has no idea what an iPad is, or what it is for.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
I agree: even the title strikes me as a complete non-sequitur. I mean, do companies usually kill off moderately successful products because another product is doing much better? (Especially when the less successful one serves as the only development platform for the successful one)
Before .NET 4.0, object Universe = NULL;
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
-
iSmile?
Workout progress:
Current arm size: 14.4in
Desired arm size: 18in
Next Target: 15.4in by Dec 2010Current training method: HIT
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
Me think the life cycle of computers and phones are not quite the same; and unless there are major innovation the new computers (from all makers) will only be incremental in features and performances, while phones (intelligent and dumb) are still in relative progression in regards of features and performance.
Watched code never compiles.
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
LOL! The article was funny. What the guy does not know is that sales of Mac's have been the best ever in recent times. But it is true that iPad like devices will be more for the general users and Mac and PC for more advanced users. But that's still a long way.
-
iSmile?
Workout progress:
Current arm size: 14.4in
Desired arm size: 18in
Next Target: 15.4in by Dec 2010Current training method: HIT
-
http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonic-shifts/2010/06/08/does-apple-s-iphone-4-signal-the-death-of-the-macintosh.html[^] I'm going to wait and see, but this does tend to go with the history of Apple and IPod sales eclipsing the sale of their computers.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
modified on Monday, June 14, 2010 11:50 AM
...and given that Microsoft too how many years to get Vista out there, I think I'd give Mr Jobs another few weeks before clamouring for more MacOS stuff and for performing the last rights. Lame.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
-
I agree: even the title strikes me as a complete non-sequitur. I mean, do companies usually kill off moderately successful products because another product is doing much better? (Especially when the less successful one serves as the only development platform for the successful one)
Before .NET 4.0, object Universe = NULL;
I was trying, unsuccessfully to be sarcastic. I don't think they're going away.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
I was trying, unsuccessfully to be sarcastic. I don't think they're going away.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
Actually I mean the title of the article, not your CP post :)
Before .NET 4.0, object Universe = NULL;
-
...and given that Microsoft too how many years to get Vista out there, I think I'd give Mr Jobs another few weeks before clamouring for more MacOS stuff and for performing the last rights. Lame.
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
Don't get me wrong. I don't think it's going away anytime soon, but I can't remember the last mac commercial.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
The title alone tells me this is one more person who has no idea what an iPad is, or what it is for.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
one more person who has no idea what an iPad is, or what it is for.
Just like the other million who bought one
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
-
Actually I mean the title of the article, not your CP post :)
Before .NET 4.0, object Universe = NULL;
I wasn't sure so I thought I'd be clearer. Thanks.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
The iPod line has been the star making Apple grow the most significantly since iTunes hit the PC. I recall reading in 2006 about how the Mac line was going to end because of the iPod. Again in 2009 because of the iPhone. I guess 2010 is time for the iPad to get this headline. Apple is not killing one of Steve Jobs' biggest babies (OSX is a repackaged NeXt OS with some improvements) and they aren't going to kill one of their most profitable divisions. In the really high end market ($1500+ per machine) Apple was dominant last I knew with over 80% of the market. That same market has the highest profit margin. (I'm not going to defend how much they cost, they had been competitive a few years ago but seem to be really putting the screws in of late. It's really insane right now.)
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
ragnaroknrol wrote:
OSX is a repackaged NeXt OS
Wrong. It's a repackaged version of BSD. NeXTOS was a fork of UNIX.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
Don't get me wrong. I don't think it's going away anytime soon, but I can't remember the last mac commercial.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
Hi. I'm a Mac, and I'm a PC.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
one more person who has no idea what an iPad is, or what it is for.
Just like the other million who bought one
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
ROTFL. How sad it must be to work so hard to rise above the masses, that you don't take the time to understand what you're mocking.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
ragnaroknrol wrote:
OSX is a repackaged NeXt OS
Wrong. It's a repackaged version of BSD. NeXTOS was a fork of UNIX.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Open BSD. I am aware. It is also HEAVILY based on how NeXTOS was designed for "look and feel" which I think we can all agree is what matters most to Mr. Jobs. As long as it looks the way he likes and acts how he wants, Steve Jobs wouldn't care if Mac OS and the iPhone OS were run on baby seal fur and Fairy farts.
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.