Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. @Microsoft

@Microsoft

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharplinq
51 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Henry Minute

    In that case, if you know you will not be using LINQ, target .NET 3.0 right from the start. Don't blame Microsoft for your lack of foresight.

    Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Christian Graus
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    3.0 was a patch to add WPF ( and LINQ, I thought ) to 2.0. Why would you target the patch version ( I believe you install it by running an installer on top of 2.0 ) and not 2.0 or 3.5 ?

    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

    H A 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Christian Graus

      Why on earth would anyone target .NET 3.0 ? What happens, in any case ?

      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

      H Offline
      H Offline
      Henry Minute
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      There is no System.Linq namespace in 3.0. So if you change from 3.5 to 3.0 you have to go through removing the autoinserted 'Using System.Linq' references.

      Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L lepipele

        Screw you, and your: using System.Linq; %#$^#$Y$%GH$%ET#$%T$$@#!!!

        A Offline
        A Offline
        AspDotNetDev
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        I personally dislike that it adds that to new files. I rarely ever use it and it clutters up Intellisense (until I get annoyed enough to go and delete it from the top of the file). I wonder if the template for new files can be changed so that that using statement isn't part of it... that'd be nice.

        [Forum Guidelines]

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Henry Minute

          There is no System.Linq namespace in 3.0. So if you change from 3.5 to 3.0 you have to go through removing the autoinserted 'Using System.Linq' references.

          Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christian Graus
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          OK, so does search and replace not work in VS2008 ? Works for me.

          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

          H P 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Christian Graus

            3.0 was a patch to add WPF ( and LINQ, I thought ) to 2.0. Why would you target the patch version ( I believe you install it by running an installer on top of 2.0 ) and not 2.0 or 3.5 ?

            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

            H Offline
            H Offline
            Henry Minute
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Your knowledge of these things is probably greater than mine but I thought that when VS2008 was released it was with .NET 3.0 and 3.5 came along later.

            Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Christian Graus

              OK, so does search and replace not work in VS2008 ? Works for me.

              Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

              H Offline
              H Offline
              Henry Minute
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Works for me too. Apparently not for the OP though. And of course there is always the 'Remove and Sort Unused Usings' context menu. Although you have to do that file by file.

              Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                OK, so does search and replace not work in VS2008 ? Works for me.

                Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pete OHanlon
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                You and your fancy-dance technology tricks. :rolleyes:

                I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be

                My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Pete OHanlon

                  You and your fancy-dance technology tricks. :rolleyes:

                  I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be

                  My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Christian Graus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Well, I was going to say, if it works for me, surely it's not hard ? :P I keep meaning to ask, what do you think of the new Maiden ?

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Henry Minute

                    Your knowledge of these things is probably greater than mine but I thought that when VS2008 was released it was with .NET 3.0 and 3.5 came along later.

                    Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Christian Graus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    I don't believe so. .NET 3.0 was a patch that gave VS it's first ability to create WPF projects. The next IDE along was .NET 3.5.

                    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                    H S 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • C Christian Graus

                      3.0 was a patch to add WPF ( and LINQ, I thought ) to 2.0. Why would you target the patch version ( I believe you install it by running an installer on top of 2.0 ) and not 2.0 or 3.5 ?

                      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      AspDotNetDev
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      So why not target a lower version for those silly users that don't like to upgrade until absolutely necessary?

                      [Forum Guidelines]

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A AspDotNetDev

                        So why not target a lower version for those silly users that don't like to upgrade until absolutely necessary?

                        [Forum Guidelines]

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Christian Graus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        I guess that depends on your method of distribution. .NET 3.0 was pretty buggy, although .NET 3.5 is not perfect. If you're distributing over the web, why not ask them to download one thing instead of two, and if you're distributing on a CD/DVD, why not give them the more up to date version on the DVD ?

                        Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Christian Graus

                          Well, I was going to say, if it works for me, surely it's not hard ? :P I keep meaning to ask, what do you think of the new Maiden ?

                          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          Pete OHanlon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          I like it - a lot. It's not classic Maiden, but it's better than a shed load of the dross that's being churned out now. Following your advice I got the new A7X CD yesterday. I prefer that, if truth be told - but The Final Frontier is a good album. Mind you, Maiden have the best music video I've seen in a very long time - WHAT KEPT YOU EDDIE? Clickety[^]

                          I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be

                          My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christian Graus

                            I don't believe so. .NET 3.0 was a patch that gave VS it's first ability to create WPF projects. The next IDE along was .NET 3.5.

                            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                            H Offline
                            H Offline
                            Henry Minute
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            Yes. You are correct. 3.0 was released during the life of VS2005 to bring WPF etc. VS2008 was released with 3.5.

                            Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Christian Graus

                              I guess that depends on your method of distribution. .NET 3.0 was pretty buggy, although .NET 3.5 is not perfect. If you're distributing over the web, why not ask them to download one thing instead of two, and if you're distributing on a CD/DVD, why not give them the more up to date version on the DVD ?

                              Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              AspDotNetDev
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Christian Graus wrote:

                              why not ask them to download one thing instead of two

                              What do you mean? How would targetting .NET 3.5 mean they need to download 1 thing instead of 2?

                              [Forum Guidelines]

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A AspDotNetDev

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                why not ask them to download one thing instead of two

                                What do you mean? How would targetting .NET 3.5 mean they need to download 1 thing instead of 2?

                                [Forum Guidelines]

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Christian Graus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                3.0 was a patch to 2.0. 3.5 is a single download. I thought you were advocating targeting the 'earlier' framework, which is 3.0, and which is what the OP is talking about.

                                Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Pete OHanlon

                                  I like it - a lot. It's not classic Maiden, but it's better than a shed load of the dross that's being churned out now. Following your advice I got the new A7X CD yesterday. I prefer that, if truth be told - but The Final Frontier is a good album. Mind you, Maiden have the best music video I've seen in a very long time - WHAT KEPT YOU EDDIE? Clickety[^]

                                  I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be

                                  My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Christian Graus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Yeah, the clip is great. The first two songs on the CD are the best, IMO, and I agree, I like A7X a lot more, but the Maiden is still very, very good.

                                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Christian Graus

                                    3.0 was a patch to 2.0. 3.5 is a single download. I thought you were advocating targeting the 'earlier' framework, which is 3.0, and which is what the OP is talking about.

                                    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    AspDotNetDev
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    I thought 3.5 was also built atop 2.0[^]. Also, Vista comes with .Net 3.0, so it seems like there may be a reasonably large user base out there who may not have upgraded but who do use 3.0. Don't see a reason to target a later version when all you need is the earlier version. More users may be able to use the software that way.

                                    [Forum Guidelines]

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • H Henry Minute

                                      Works for me too. Apparently not for the OP though. And of course there is always the 'Remove and Sort Unused Usings' context menu. Although you have to do that file by file.

                                      Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Marc Clifton
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Henry Minute wrote:

                                      'Remove and Sort Unused Usings'

                                      That's a good Zen question. What's the sort order of an unused using after it's been removed. ;) Marc

                                      H 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L lepipele

                                        Screw you, and your: using System.Linq; %#$^#$Y$%GH$%ET#$%T$$@#!!!

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mycroft Holmes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        right click sort and delete - difficult stuff this programming!

                                        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Marc Clifton

                                          Henry Minute wrote:

                                          'Remove and Sort Unused Usings'

                                          That's a good Zen question. What's the sort order of an unused using after it's been removed. ;) Marc

                                          H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          Henry Minute
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          Hang on, I'll just get my Harley Manual out and check. I'll get back to you. :)

                                          Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups