Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. while (*s++ = ((*t & 0x60) == 0x40 ? *t ^ 0x20 : *t)) t++;

while (*s++ = ((*t & 0x60) == 0x40 ? *t ^ 0x20 : *t)) t++;

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
rubyquestion
40 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rob Philpott

    It's turning into one of 'those' Friday afternoons. Any takers for what this gem does?

    Regards, Rob Philpott.

    P Offline
    P Offline
    PHLIPH
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Yeah, converts to lower case is right - but don't forget it also does '@' => '`', '[' => '{', '\' => '|', ']' => '}', '^' => '-', and '_' => del. Just felt the need to punctuate it. :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rob Philpott

      It's turning into one of 'those' Friday afternoons. Any takers for what this gem does?

      Regards, Rob Philpott.

      N Offline
      N Offline
      neil hudson
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      It corrupts strings with @ [ \ ] ^ and _ in them.

      Neil Hudson

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jonas Hammarberg

        Copying string, turning upper case into lower case...

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rosenne
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        Only in America... I mean, only for US ASCII. :thumbsdown:

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Pete OHanlon

          Rob Philpott wrote:

          Any takers for what this gem does?

          Why that's obvious. It makes you hate the coder who spewed it into your source.

          I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be

          My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

          Y Offline
          Y Offline
          yoni at jefco
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          I was going to say "Hopefully get someone sacked". Maybe a bit harsh on my part.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Larry G Grimes

            It definitely returns a string with all lowercase characters.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Matthew Barnett
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            Larry G. Grimes wrote:

            It definitely returns a string with all lowercase characters.

            It'll change other characters too, such as '@' to '`'!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rosenne

              Only in America... I mean, only for US ASCII. :thumbsdown:

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jonas Hammarberg
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Worked for ANSI to, albeit only the lower parts :rolleyes:

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rob Philpott

                It's turning into one of 'those' Friday afternoons. Any takers for what this gem does?

                Regards, Rob Philpott.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lev Vayner
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                maybe the author should start writing normal code.. in c#, this would be done with s.ToLower() yeah.. thats it.. no non-sense pointer code with an inline loop referencing hex values

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jonas Hammarberg

                  Worked for ANSI to, albeit only the lower parts :rolleyes:

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rosenne
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  I the context of software, only as well as but generally mean a bug.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rob Philpott

                    It's turning into one of 'those' Friday afternoons. Any takers for what this gem does?

                    Regards, Rob Philpott.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    stevee1984
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    Maybe something like this would work better, then we can use the code for email addresses etc. while (*s++ = (*t >='A' && *t <= 'Z' ? *t ^ 0x20 : *t) ) t++;

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rob Philpott

                      ..just for fun really. It's nearly the weekend..

                      Regards, Rob Philpott.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DominLondon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      Robbo!

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D DominLondon

                        Robbo!

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rob Philpott
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        Dude!

                        Regards, Rob Philpott.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rob Philpott

                          It's turning into one of 'those' Friday afternoons. Any takers for what this gem does?

                          Regards, Rob Philpott.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          leonej_dt
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          I will assume both s and t are char*. *t & 0x60: Filters all but two bits of *t. I will call those bits xy (the most significant one first). (*t & 0x60) == 0x40: Tests whether xy is 10. (*t & 0x60) == 0x40 ? *t ^0x20 : *t: If xy is 10, it returns a new character equal to *t, but with xy equal to 11. Otherwise, it returns the original character. The whole loop iterates through a C string starting at s and copies it to another C string starting at t, but characters from 0x40 to 0x5F are converted into characters from 0x60 to 07F. The original string is left untouched, unless s equals t. (If t points to another character actually inside the C string pointed by s or vice versa, the program goes crazy.) To the end user, this means the following: Uppercase characters are converted into lowercase characters, square brackets are converted into braces, the backslash is converted into a vertical line character, the French circumflex accent character is converted into the tilde character, and the underline character is converted into a DEL character.

                          If you can play The Dance of Eternity (Dream Theater), then we shall make a band.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Rob Philpott

                            It's turning into one of 'those' Friday afternoons. Any takers for what this gem does?

                            Regards, Rob Philpott.

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Atanas Palavrov
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            This is trivial ToLover() ... well, if you know ASCII. This is better: while (*s++ = ((*t & ~0x1F) == 0x40 ? *t ^ 0x20 : *t)) t++; And this is more clear: #define mask (~('a'-'B')) while (*s++ = ((*t & mask == ('A' & mask) ? *t ^ ('a'-'A') : *t)) t++;

                            www.codigi.net .NET touch screen GUI components suite

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups