Is this common everywhere?
-
Hey linux and opensource is the final answer to everything. If you can't deal with that then it's your problem. If you don't believe in that you will be in the last circle of hell.
Can't anyone see the Joke Icon.... ???? Bloomin' UniVoter...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Can't anyone see the Joke Icon.... ???? Bloomin' UniVoter...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
Thank you sire on noticing the joke icon. :rose:
-
Hey linux and opensource is the final answer to everything. If you can't deal with that then it's your problem. If you don't believe in that you will be in the last circle of hell.
Hint for the 1-voter... See that joke icon on HimanshuJoshi's post? Think about it...
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Well, this is one my first posts here in the Lounge... I just wanted to expose a situation I find very often. And rant a little. Oh well. First, a disclaimer: I am currently working as a software developer in a mostly-Linux shop. We develop and maintain mission-critical systems for telecommunications. Naturally, most of work is done in C++ using vi and emacs in remote terminals. So I have no problems working with either C++, Linux, Windows or C# (which is my personal favorite). For me it is just a question of working with different tools to get the job done. But the problem is: very often I find people who seems to be completely anti-Microsoft. They would refuse to use any Microsoft technology, and when questioned why, they would just reply: "Because it is from Microsoft". It would be OK if they said: "It didn't attend our needs", "It does not have feature X", or "we needed true platform independence" (which sometimes just isn't true, as platform independence is used only as a marketing feature). But the only reason I hear is that it was not even considered because "it was from Microsoft". How could that be? By the way, in one of the most prestigiated universities here, students are supposed to know Linux and only Linux. They aren't even allowed to be creative in their user interfaces, because most of the exercises are corrected by an automated system which simply pass things to the input of a student's program and waits for an expected output. It is like if Linux and open-source software were the only truth they would need in life. For me, this whole anti-Microsoft, pro-free software fanatism is just ridiculous. I use free and open-source software, but I also use commercial ones. I actually develop free and open-source software, but I also work on a commercial one. There are people out there who thinks anything that comes from a commercial corporation is evil and should be avoided at all costs, even if this implies using sub-optimal software just because it is "libre". I don't even dare anymore to explain why my preferred language is C# to those people. When they ask, they aren't really interested in the answer. They just get amused because, in their own closed mind, anything Microsoft must suck. So, does this happen in the rest of the world as well? How do you deal with it?
Interested in Machine Learning in .NET? Check the Accord.NET Framework. See also
And there is a good reason. Although, many of their tools and technologies are great most are designed with a technician and a 2 year life-cycle in mind. ADO.NET and data readers solved most business software problems related to database handling. Yet, since 2001, how many technologies have spewed forth and how many, "frameworks" have leapt off the page to make this trivial concept easier? Worse, how many are no longer supported or in favor? Students need to learn the fundamental concepts of how to develop, not which button to click. Systems need to be maintainable 10 years down the road. MS isn't stupid; they provide both but the anti-MS crowd, for good reason, see the technician half and frown.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
-
Thank you sire on noticing the joke icon. :rose:
My kids hate me for noticing things... If they could, they'd univote me for that. ---You're welcome---
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Well, this is one my first posts here in the Lounge... I just wanted to expose a situation I find very often. And rant a little. Oh well. First, a disclaimer: I am currently working as a software developer in a mostly-Linux shop. We develop and maintain mission-critical systems for telecommunications. Naturally, most of work is done in C++ using vi and emacs in remote terminals. So I have no problems working with either C++, Linux, Windows or C# (which is my personal favorite). For me it is just a question of working with different tools to get the job done. But the problem is: very often I find people who seems to be completely anti-Microsoft. They would refuse to use any Microsoft technology, and when questioned why, they would just reply: "Because it is from Microsoft". It would be OK if they said: "It didn't attend our needs", "It does not have feature X", or "we needed true platform independence" (which sometimes just isn't true, as platform independence is used only as a marketing feature). But the only reason I hear is that it was not even considered because "it was from Microsoft". How could that be? By the way, in one of the most prestigiated universities here, students are supposed to know Linux and only Linux. They aren't even allowed to be creative in their user interfaces, because most of the exercises are corrected by an automated system which simply pass things to the input of a student's program and waits for an expected output. It is like if Linux and open-source software were the only truth they would need in life. For me, this whole anti-Microsoft, pro-free software fanatism is just ridiculous. I use free and open-source software, but I also use commercial ones. I actually develop free and open-source software, but I also work on a commercial one. There are people out there who thinks anything that comes from a commercial corporation is evil and should be avoided at all costs, even if this implies using sub-optimal software just because it is "libre". I don't even dare anymore to explain why my preferred language is C# to those people. When they ask, they aren't really interested in the answer. They just get amused because, in their own closed mind, anything Microsoft must suck. So, does this happen in the rest of the world as well? How do you deal with it?
Interested in Machine Learning in .NET? Check the Accord.NET Framework. See also
-
Hint for the 1-voter... See that joke icon on HimanshuJoshi's post? Think about it...
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Hey linux and opensource is the final answer to everything. If you can't deal with that then it's your problem. If you don't believe in that you will be in the last circle of hell.
So true. I know last weekend when I was up till 4AM compiling my custom linux kernel to run on my toaster I almost wet myself with excitement (or perhaps I'd just blown something in my kidneys after sitting so long waiting for the compile to finish) to see the kernel boot up and running
$ ls /proc/toast
All Hail GNU! All Hail the Might of RMS and his doughty blowhards, the Foundation of Silly Freetards (FSF)!
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
And there is a good reason. Although, many of their tools and technologies are great most are designed with a technician and a 2 year life-cycle in mind. ADO.NET and data readers solved most business software problems related to database handling. Yet, since 2001, how many technologies have spewed forth and how many, "frameworks" have leapt off the page to make this trivial concept easier? Worse, how many are no longer supported or in favor? Students need to learn the fundamental concepts of how to develop, not which button to click. Systems need to be maintainable 10 years down the road. MS isn't stupid; they provide both but the anti-MS crowd, for good reason, see the technician half and frown.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
Yes, but unlike many people in the anti-MS crowd, you actually have well thought out reasons, as opposed to the ignorant tripe that most of the lemmings on Slashdot will spew on about.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
Apparently not only. Our university is member of the MSDNAA, so all Microsoft products (except Office) are completely free of charge.
Interested in Machine Learning in .NET? Check the Accord.NET Framework. See also Handwriting Recognition Revisited: Kernel Support Vector Machines
-
Well, this is one my first posts here in the Lounge... I just wanted to expose a situation I find very often. And rant a little. Oh well. First, a disclaimer: I am currently working as a software developer in a mostly-Linux shop. We develop and maintain mission-critical systems for telecommunications. Naturally, most of work is done in C++ using vi and emacs in remote terminals. So I have no problems working with either C++, Linux, Windows or C# (which is my personal favorite). For me it is just a question of working with different tools to get the job done. But the problem is: very often I find people who seems to be completely anti-Microsoft. They would refuse to use any Microsoft technology, and when questioned why, they would just reply: "Because it is from Microsoft". It would be OK if they said: "It didn't attend our needs", "It does not have feature X", or "we needed true platform independence" (which sometimes just isn't true, as platform independence is used only as a marketing feature). But the only reason I hear is that it was not even considered because "it was from Microsoft". How could that be? By the way, in one of the most prestigiated universities here, students are supposed to know Linux and only Linux. They aren't even allowed to be creative in their user interfaces, because most of the exercises are corrected by an automated system which simply pass things to the input of a student's program and waits for an expected output. It is like if Linux and open-source software were the only truth they would need in life. For me, this whole anti-Microsoft, pro-free software fanatism is just ridiculous. I use free and open-source software, but I also use commercial ones. I actually develop free and open-source software, but I also work on a commercial one. There are people out there who thinks anything that comes from a commercial corporation is evil and should be avoided at all costs, even if this implies using sub-optimal software just because it is "libre". I don't even dare anymore to explain why my preferred language is C# to those people. When they ask, they aren't really interested in the answer. They just get amused because, in their own closed mind, anything Microsoft must suck. So, does this happen in the rest of the world as well? How do you deal with it?
Interested in Machine Learning in .NET? Check the Accord.NET Framework. See also
-
And there is a good reason. Although, many of their tools and technologies are great most are designed with a technician and a 2 year life-cycle in mind. ADO.NET and data readers solved most business software problems related to database handling. Yet, since 2001, how many technologies have spewed forth and how many, "frameworks" have leapt off the page to make this trivial concept easier? Worse, how many are no longer supported or in favor? Students need to learn the fundamental concepts of how to develop, not which button to click. Systems need to be maintainable 10 years down the road. MS isn't stupid; they provide both but the anti-MS crowd, for good reason, see the technician half and frown.
Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost
I'm not pro per say but definitely not anti. I kind of hate most of the haters(yourself excluded). :-O For once, because the whole free stuff it's just an illusion. And I'm not talking about the MS campaigns about how much you lose or earn from using free vs ms software. I hate the hypocrisy of things like Google that pretend that they are creating software for the benefits of the mass. A big Bull... As I'm sure you know almost no software is created for free. It has some financing behind it. Opera, Mozilla, Mono(Novel and MS behind with $ and support) etc. to name a few. Besides people(not IT guys, developers and the likes) get the feeling that software is something very easy and cheap to create. Don't get me wrong, in a perfect world, if it was for me to decide, I would totally eradicate the monetary system from the face of this planet. But, it's not a perfect world and in this world it does not make much sense other than to bart at the likes of MS, Apple, Oracle and so on, for how evil they are. At least they have the guts to admit that they are creating software and/or hardware for profit.
I used to think.... Finally I realized it's no good.
-
Hey linux and opensource is the final answer to everything. If you can't deal with that then it's your problem. If you don't believe in that you will be in the last circle of hell.
HimanshuJoshi wrote:
Hey linux and opensource is the final answer to everything
So, Linux == 42 ?
-
I'm not pro per say but definitely not anti. I kind of hate most of the haters(yourself excluded). :-O For once, because the whole free stuff it's just an illusion. And I'm not talking about the MS campaigns about how much you lose or earn from using free vs ms software. I hate the hypocrisy of things like Google that pretend that they are creating software for the benefits of the mass. A big Bull... As I'm sure you know almost no software is created for free. It has some financing behind it. Opera, Mozilla, Mono(Novel and MS behind with $ and support) etc. to name a few. Besides people(not IT guys, developers and the likes) get the feeling that software is something very easy and cheap to create. Don't get me wrong, in a perfect world, if it was for me to decide, I would totally eradicate the monetary system from the face of this planet. But, it's not a perfect world and in this world it does not make much sense other than to bart at the likes of MS, Apple, Oracle and so on, for how evil they are. At least they have the guts to admit that they are creating software and/or hardware for profit.
I used to think.... Finally I realized it's no good.
MDL=>Moshu wrote:
I would totally eradicate the monetary system from the face of this planet
Interesting. How would that work for the elderly or infirm members of society?
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
-
Well, this is one my first posts here in the Lounge... I just wanted to expose a situation I find very often. And rant a little. Oh well. First, a disclaimer: I am currently working as a software developer in a mostly-Linux shop. We develop and maintain mission-critical systems for telecommunications. Naturally, most of work is done in C++ using vi and emacs in remote terminals. So I have no problems working with either C++, Linux, Windows or C# (which is my personal favorite). For me it is just a question of working with different tools to get the job done. But the problem is: very often I find people who seems to be completely anti-Microsoft. They would refuse to use any Microsoft technology, and when questioned why, they would just reply: "Because it is from Microsoft". It would be OK if they said: "It didn't attend our needs", "It does not have feature X", or "we needed true platform independence" (which sometimes just isn't true, as platform independence is used only as a marketing feature). But the only reason I hear is that it was not even considered because "it was from Microsoft". How could that be? By the way, in one of the most prestigiated universities here, students are supposed to know Linux and only Linux. They aren't even allowed to be creative in their user interfaces, because most of the exercises are corrected by an automated system which simply pass things to the input of a student's program and waits for an expected output. It is like if Linux and open-source software were the only truth they would need in life. For me, this whole anti-Microsoft, pro-free software fanatism is just ridiculous. I use free and open-source software, but I also use commercial ones. I actually develop free and open-source software, but I also work on a commercial one. There are people out there who thinks anything that comes from a commercial corporation is evil and should be avoided at all costs, even if this implies using sub-optimal software just because it is "libre". I don't even dare anymore to explain why my preferred language is C# to those people. When they ask, they aren't really interested in the answer. They just get amused because, in their own closed mind, anything Microsoft must suck. So, does this happen in the rest of the world as well? How do you deal with it?
Interested in Machine Learning in .NET? Check the Accord.NET Framework. See also
Your description of university is exactly how mine was here in the US. I once got a 0 on a major project because I accidentally and subconsciously corrected a spelling error in the expected primary output. Needless to say, I chose not to remain at that institution. I got an internship in the private sector doing .NET development and was woefully unprepared. It was awesome! Fortunately they were patient with me and I'm much better off now. :)
-
MDL=>Moshu wrote:
I would totally eradicate the monetary system from the face of this planet
Interesting. How would that work for the elderly or infirm members of society?
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
We wouldn't have to worry about it. After all it would be a perfect world. In other words, beats the hell out of me. :) Some exchange(not server) based system, like ok X produces bread(works at a bread company) Z grows vegetables and fruit and so on. And everybody gets it well deserved peace of bread and fruit and.... Ok this is more than perfect it's a dreamy/irealistic world but I have my right to dream.
I used to think.... Finally I realized it's no good.
-
We wouldn't have to worry about it. After all it would be a perfect world. In other words, beats the hell out of me. :) Some exchange(not server) based system, like ok X produces bread(works at a bread company) Z grows vegetables and fruit and so on. And everybody gets it well deserved peace of bread and fruit and.... Ok this is more than perfect it's a dreamy/irealistic world but I have my right to dream.
I used to think.... Finally I realized it's no good.
Dream on!
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
-
Neat phrase! Those are some really hardcore nuns.
-
MDL=>Moshu wrote:
I would totally eradicate the monetary system from the face of this planet
Interesting. How would that work for the elderly or infirm members of society?
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
Henry Minute wrote:
MDL=>Moshu wrote: I would totally eradicate the monetary system from the face of this planet Interesting. How would that work for the elderly or infirm members of society?
Easy, in such a system they would have to be the food.
He said, "Boy I'm just old and lonely, But thank you for your concern, Here's wishing you a Happy New Year." I wished him one back in return.
-
I'm not trying to take sides, but have you ever considered that people can have different views on what's funny and not?