Recursive Fail
-
Go to Google and search for "f# recursion" (without quotes). Then keep clicking "Did you mean: f# recursion". :laugh:
To understand what is happening, first see this [^] and continue down the thread :-).
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Oh those wacky Google engineers. They are so zany, and by zany I mean totally unfunny. :rolleyes:
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
They are so zany, and by zany I mean totally unfunny
:doh: See my reply....
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Wow, you amuse amaze me. You're answering yourself recursively :-D
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
They are so zany, and by zany I mean totally unfunny
:doh: See my reply....
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Now yours was funny, which was why I voted 5.
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
To understand what is happening, first see this [^] and continue down the thread :-).
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Cheeze, I dun get dat wid all da fancy recushawn stuff y'all talkin' 'bout. You done had me goin' round in circles 'til I got dizzy :confused: :laugh:
modified on Tuesday, January 4, 2011 6:14 PM
-
aspdotnetdev wrote:
[WikiLeaks Cablegate Cables]
take 5 for your signature! :-D can I borrow it?
Rosendo Lopez wrote:
can I borrow it?
No, but you can have it! I have plenty more where that came from. :-D
-
To understand what is happening, first see this [^] and continue down the thread :-).
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]I think this explains it better. ;)
-
I think this explains it better. ;)
Stop it already y'all. I'm a clickin' and a clickin' an I'm gettin' nowheres. :laugh:
-
reminds me of the old schoolyard joke about how to keep an idiot busy: write "turn over" on both sides of a piece of paper and give it to the idiot.
Fight Big Government:
http://obamacareclassaction.com/
http://obamacaretruth.org/ -
Go to Google and search for "f# recursion" (without quotes). Then keep clicking "Did you mean: f# recursion". :laugh:
-
Go to Google and search for "f# recursion" (without quotes). Then keep clicking "Did you mean: f# recursion". :laugh:
-
You guys must have set the 'enable_recursion' flag, because I don't get the 'Did you mean'...
must be google in english: http://www.google.com/#q=f%23+recursion&hl=en&fp=851980d222c50060[^]
(why you wanna see a signature here?)
-
Go to Google and search for "f# recursion" (without quotes). Then keep clicking "Did you mean: f# recursion". :laugh:
Its odd, it seems to happen with a large number of "X# recursion" where X is any single letter it doesn't happen with z# or p#...if it was intentional i'd have expected "vb recusion" and only c# f# and possibly j# to do this... I'd imagine this is a bug rather than an intentional thing...
-
Go to Google and search for "f# recursion" (without quotes). Then keep clicking "Did you mean: f# recursion". :laugh:
http://www.tastefullyoffensive.com/2011/01/5-minutes.html Damn you programmers...
-
Go to Google and search for "f# recursion" (without quotes). Then keep clicking "Did you mean: f# recursion". :laugh:
It's the "#". Try C# and you get the same thing. VB recursion asks if you meant "vba recursion" but behaves normally afterwards. C++ recursion, js recursion and python recursion all return hits without the "did you mean..." But that's funny. Wonder how many people have just clicked and clicked and clicked............. :)
Everybody SHUT UP until I finish my coffee...