Why are we sending soldiers to defend these people?
-
I’ve always thought for you as for a little retarded old man with a huge self-confidence and no respect to the facts, but now I’m changing my mind: you’re completely insane!
There is only one Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
Every word that I wrote is the absolute truth. No matter how loudly you yell, no matter upset you get, the historical facts remain. Check any dictionary you like, the etymology of the term "bugger" is "Bulgarian." And all of Western Europe used to assume that most folks in Bulgaria were queer as a three dollar bill, so much so that some corruption of Bulgarian means sodomite in most of Europe.
Deyan Georgiev wrote:
I’ve always thought for you as for a little retarded old man with a huge self-confidence and no respect to the facts
And I've always thought of you as someone who likes to attack people personally whenever he disagrees with them. :)
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
It was the arrogance of deciding everyone wanted to be American that is the basic problem. And that was decided by half a dozen men.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
Trollslayer wrote:
And that was decided by half a dozen men.
I understand that George Bush was also responsible for the Iceland Volcano explosion.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
Trollslayer wrote:
And that was decided by half a dozen men.
I understand that George Bush was also responsible for the Iceland Volcano explosion.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
No, but he is responsible for two unnecessary wars, the deaths of tens of thousands, a world-wide torture regime, and numerous violations of US law.
Majerus wrote:
No, but he is responsible for two unnecessary wars, the deaths of tens of thousands, a world-wide torture regime, and numerous violations of US law.
And also doing more to eradicate AIDS from the African Continent than the rest of the world put together. Look I hold no great brief for George Bush. Some folks back in the late great Soapbox called me a traitor because I listed my objection to his presidency. But I am amused by those who claim that America is responsible for every ill in the world. Do you really, for one second, actually maintain that America is the only country in the world to use torture? Or even the one that uses it the most? My view: the U.S. is neither a great saint nor the great Satan. We have been a force for good when we could and done things that caused great evils when we shouldn't. I certainly agree that we shouldn't have gone into Iraq; it was wrong for so many reasons that the elimination of Saddam's despotism doesn't counterbalance them in the slightest. We wasted a great many American and British lives and billions of dollars on a nation that was barbaric, is barbaric and will be barbaric. Bush's dream of turning both Iraq and Afghanistan into places fit for human habitation was misguided, stupid, and foolish. We should have left them on their own to kill each other in whatever ways they saw fit.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
Majerus wrote:
No, but he is responsible for two unnecessary wars, the deaths of tens of thousands, a world-wide torture regime, and numerous violations of US law.
And also doing more to eradicate AIDS from the African Continent than the rest of the world put together. Look I hold no great brief for George Bush. Some folks back in the late great Soapbox called me a traitor because I listed my objection to his presidency. But I am amused by those who claim that America is responsible for every ill in the world. Do you really, for one second, actually maintain that America is the only country in the world to use torture? Or even the one that uses it the most? My view: the U.S. is neither a great saint nor the great Satan. We have been a force for good when we could and done things that caused great evils when we shouldn't. I certainly agree that we shouldn't have gone into Iraq; it was wrong for so many reasons that the elimination of Saddam's despotism doesn't counterbalance them in the slightest. We wasted a great many American and British lives and billions of dollars on a nation that was barbaric, is barbaric and will be barbaric. Bush's dream of turning both Iraq and Afghanistan into places fit for human habitation was misguided, stupid, and foolish. We should have left them on their own to kill each other in whatever ways they saw fit.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
Oakman wrote:
And also doing more to eradicate AIDS from the African Continent than the rest of the world put together.
that is really great - no sarcasm - but that does nothing to mitigate anything that I have just said.
Oakman wrote:
But I am amused by those who claim that America is responsible for every ill in the world.
I've never run into those people. I have seen it used as a strawman countless times.
Oakman wrote:
Do you really, for one second, actually maintain that America is the only country in the world to use torture? Or even the one that uses it the most?
No. Just because others do it does not excuse us. Torture is still wrong regardless of who does it, or their motives.
-
Oakman wrote:
And also doing more to eradicate AIDS from the African Continent than the rest of the world put together.
that is really great - no sarcasm - but that does nothing to mitigate anything that I have just said.
Oakman wrote:
But I am amused by those who claim that America is responsible for every ill in the world.
I've never run into those people. I have seen it used as a strawman countless times.
Oakman wrote:
Do you really, for one second, actually maintain that America is the only country in the world to use torture? Or even the one that uses it the most?
No. Just because others do it does not excuse us. Torture is still wrong regardless of who does it, or their motives.
Majerus wrote:
that is really great - no sarcasm - but that does nothing to mitigate anything that I have just said.
Majerus wrote:
I've never run into those people
Majerus wrote:
Torture is still wrong regardless of who does it, or their motives.
I don't know how else to deal with a world view that seems as divorced from reality as yours. Life, I am afraid, is not a moral jungle gym and there is no gold medal for being nice. Nor are your personal contacts a sufficient sampling of the universe to be offered up as something other than anecdotal evidence. As to judging a man only by his failings, I sincerely hope that never happens to you.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
Majerus wrote:
that is really great - no sarcasm - but that does nothing to mitigate anything that I have just said.
Majerus wrote:
I've never run into those people
Majerus wrote:
Torture is still wrong regardless of who does it, or their motives.
I don't know how else to deal with a world view that seems as divorced from reality as yours. Life, I am afraid, is not a moral jungle gym and there is no gold medal for being nice. Nor are your personal contacts a sufficient sampling of the universe to be offered up as something other than anecdotal evidence. As to judging a man only by his failings, I sincerely hope that never happens to you.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
Oakman wrote:
And I've always thought of you as someone who likes to attack people personally whenever he disagrees with them.
[^] :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Thanks for that. Don't think I'll bother with reading your response. (Will he or won't he - eh, who cares?)
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
What happened in Bulgaria?
What happens in Bulgaria, stays in Bulgaria!
-
It was the arrogance of deciding everyone wanted to be American that is the basic problem. And that was decided by half a dozen men.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
Trollslayer wrote:
It was the arrogance of deciding everyone wanted to be American that is the basic problem.
Arrogant... Yes. Foolish... yes. We seem to just follow around old colonial powers (Great Britain, France, Spain, etc...) and try to clean up their messes. It didn't work for them and works no better for the US.
-
I have no problem with homosexuality, I do , however, have a problem with children being sodomised for the pleasure of old men. You, apparently, have no problem with that.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]
From the article "British officers in Helmand requested the study to help them understand the sexual behaviour of locals and Afghan comrades after young soldiers became uneasy they were being propositioned. American social scientists employed to help troops understand the local culture reported that homosexual sex was widespread among the Pashtun ethnic group in southern Afghanistan. Strict separation of men and women, coupled with poverty and the significant expense of getting married, contributed to young men turning to each other for sexual companionship. "To dismiss the existence of this dynamic out of desire to avoid western discomfort is to risk failing to comprehend an essential social force underlying Pashtun culture," the report said. ' Nothing here about either children or sodomy. "Older, powerful men boosted their social status by keeping boys as sexual playthings and the practice was celebrated in song and dance, a military study claimed. " OK, you're reading sodomy into it, and how does one define a boy here? Given that (apparently) the whole reason for the study was that the soldiers were being propositioned - are we talking late teenagers , prepubescent boys? It does say "where prepubescent boys are widely admired." which is worrying, but it does NOT say prepubescent boys are widely buggered. It also says "Western soldiers often report feeling unease at the attentions of their Afghan comrades, who are affectionate with each other and sometimes wear make-up. " Are their comrades prepubescent? No - so they seem to be saying that our wonderful boys are a bit homophobic? "British troops have also talked of their disgust at police or militias keeping young boys as hangers on. " Worrying - yes - but what is a hanger on (on to what are they hanging?) "She said: "They were having young men who were beginning to feel uncomfortable because they felt they were being approached." She said the study gave no advice about what action troops should take if they confronted paedophilia. " Seems to me that the reporter has asked the author about it, to which she has replied "No - the report says nothing about what troops should do if confronted by paedophilia" And then "Afghanistan is a sovereign nation with its own law under which the sexual abuse of children is illegal. " IN all, this news report is crap, says nothing and insinuates much.
Dalek Dave wrote:
You, apparently, have no problem with that.
-
Every word that I wrote is the absolute truth. No matter how loudly you yell, no matter upset you get, the historical facts remain. Check any dictionary you like, the etymology of the term "bugger" is "Bulgarian." And all of Western Europe used to assume that most folks in Bulgaria were queer as a three dollar bill, so much so that some corruption of Bulgarian means sodomite in most of Europe.
Deyan Georgiev wrote:
I’ve always thought for you as for a little retarded old man with a huge self-confidence and no respect to the facts
And I've always thought of you as someone who likes to attack people personally whenever he disagrees with them. :)
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
Okay, let's do the easiest thing - look at wikipedia: "Etymologically, a "Bugger" was a "Bulgre" (French Bougre). Originally, it was derived from the French word "Boulgrerie" ("of Bulgaria"), meaning the medieval Bulgarian clerical sect of the Bogomils." ... Meanwhile, the Bogomils "regarded every material being to be work of Satan, and therefore sinful", which made their lifestyle quite ascetic - but this info is for advanced "absolute truth" speakers... Oakman, kindly check the dictionaries YOURSELF before asking the others to do it. BTW, after Your statement I conclude that "all of Western Europe" was in desperate need of a word to name ..err.. a notable number of west-european countrymen... ;)
-
Okay, let's do the easiest thing - look at wikipedia: "Etymologically, a "Bugger" was a "Bulgre" (French Bougre). Originally, it was derived from the French word "Boulgrerie" ("of Bulgaria"), meaning the medieval Bulgarian clerical sect of the Bogomils." ... Meanwhile, the Bogomils "regarded every material being to be work of Satan, and therefore sinful", which made their lifestyle quite ascetic - but this info is for advanced "absolute truth" speakers... Oakman, kindly check the dictionaries YOURSELF before asking the others to do it. BTW, after Your statement I conclude that "all of Western Europe" was in desperate need of a word to name ..err.. a notable number of west-european countrymen... ;)
Petia Petrova wrote:
Oakman, kindly check the dictionaries YOURSELF before asking the others to do it. B
Now if you'd really meant that you would have provided a link to that page in wikipedia, like this[^] but for your sake let me complete the quote you found: "It became boulgre, later bougre in Old French meaning "heretic, traitor". It entered German as Buger meaning "peasant, blockhead" (and went on to English as bugger) and the French term also entered old Italian as buggero and Spanish as bujarrón, both in the meaning of "sodomite." As for other dictionaries: Miriam Webster: " Bulgarian; from the association of Bulgaria with the Bogomils, who were accused of sodomy." Dictionary.com: "Bulgarian, by assoc. of the Balkans with heretical sects such as the Bogomils and their alleged deviant sexual practices;" According to the BBC Etymology of British swear words: 'bugger' derives from Bulgaria and the Bogomils. These were originally a heretic Christian sect who were stigmatised as sodomites. Section 12 of the UK 1956 sexual offences act refers to buggery. According to this, buggery is sexual intercourse between males or between male and female in an 'unnatural manner', or between male or female with an animal in any manner whatsoever. And to round it out, since you are fond of Wikipedia, here's what it says about most of Western Europe: "The word went on towards Venetian Italian as buzerar, meaning "to do sodomy" (the sexual acts performed by homosexuals). This word entered German again (see reborrowing) as Buserant and went on to Hungarian as buzeráns, becoming buzi around the 1900s, a form still in use as a sexual slur for male homosexuals. The word also entered Swedish, through the mediation of August Strindberg[citation needed], as bög, meaning male homosexual." I am not suggesting that every Bulgarian likes it up the butt, by the way; I am sure that some of you don't. I am only reporting that from the renaissance until the 19th century, it was a country renown throughout Europe for being a home for those who did.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
Petia Petrova wrote:
Oakman, kindly check the dictionaries YOURSELF before asking the others to do it. B
Now if you'd really meant that you would have provided a link to that page in wikipedia, like this[^] but for your sake let me complete the quote you found: "It became boulgre, later bougre in Old French meaning "heretic, traitor". It entered German as Buger meaning "peasant, blockhead" (and went on to English as bugger) and the French term also entered old Italian as buggero and Spanish as bujarrón, both in the meaning of "sodomite." As for other dictionaries: Miriam Webster: " Bulgarian; from the association of Bulgaria with the Bogomils, who were accused of sodomy." Dictionary.com: "Bulgarian, by assoc. of the Balkans with heretical sects such as the Bogomils and their alleged deviant sexual practices;" According to the BBC Etymology of British swear words: 'bugger' derives from Bulgaria and the Bogomils. These were originally a heretic Christian sect who were stigmatised as sodomites. Section 12 of the UK 1956 sexual offences act refers to buggery. According to this, buggery is sexual intercourse between males or between male and female in an 'unnatural manner', or between male or female with an animal in any manner whatsoever. And to round it out, since you are fond of Wikipedia, here's what it says about most of Western Europe: "The word went on towards Venetian Italian as buzerar, meaning "to do sodomy" (the sexual acts performed by homosexuals). This word entered German again (see reborrowing) as Buserant and went on to Hungarian as buzeráns, becoming buzi around the 1900s, a form still in use as a sexual slur for male homosexuals. The word also entered Swedish, through the mediation of August Strindberg[citation needed], as bög, meaning male homosexual." I am not suggesting that every Bulgarian likes it up the butt, by the way; I am sure that some of you don't. I am only reporting that from the renaissance until the 19th century, it was a country renown throughout Europe for being a home for those who did.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
Oakman wrote:
I am only reporting that from the renaissance until the 19th century, it was a country renown throughout Europe for being a home for those who did.
Well, seems that 'word for word' is the only way: from the association of Bulgaria with the Bogomils means NOR that EVERYBODY in Bulgaria was ACTUALLY doing that, NOR that anybody in Europe went to Bulgaria and made statistics... It means that Bogomils were such a big factor in Europe (up to some authors enlisting them among the reasons of Renaissanse) that the countryname was wide heard for first in relation with people, officially presented by the clergy as sodomites. You really should finish the job by checking what bogomils did, shouldn't You?... Not that I didn't provide a hint... Not to mention that ANY heretics (no matter of their rules and habits) were blamed of practising and spread of the 'Sodom and Gomora sinful habits' - every sin listed in the Bible was a standard part of the accusations anyway. But this is a bigger dig than a check or two in the dictionaries...
-
Oakman wrote:
I am only reporting that from the renaissance until the 19th century, it was a country renown throughout Europe for being a home for those who did.
Well, seems that 'word for word' is the only way: from the association of Bulgaria with the Bogomils means NOR that EVERYBODY in Bulgaria was ACTUALLY doing that, NOR that anybody in Europe went to Bulgaria and made statistics... It means that Bogomils were such a big factor in Europe (up to some authors enlisting them among the reasons of Renaissanse) that the countryname was wide heard for first in relation with people, officially presented by the clergy as sodomites. You really should finish the job by checking what bogomils did, shouldn't You?... Not that I didn't provide a hint... Not to mention that ANY heretics (no matter of their rules and habits) were blamed of practising and spread of the 'Sodom and Gomora sinful habits' - every sin listed in the Bible was a standard part of the accusations anyway. But this is a bigger dig than a check or two in the dictionaries...
Petia Petrova wrote:
Not to mention that ANY heretics (no matter of their rules and habits) were blamed of practising and spread of the 'Sodom and Gomora sinful habits'
And yet, France get a reputation for raging heterosexuality in spite of hosting more heretical beliefs than a dozen Bulgarians could shake a. . .stick at. England, of course, gets a reputation for puritanicality in spite of being turned into an entire country of heretics (according to the Pope) and then outsources that reputation to America. Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
Petia Petrova wrote:
You really should finish the job by checking what bogomils did, shouldn't You?...
I tell you what. I'll write my posts to please me, and you write your posts to please you. Amazingly enough, I do not intend to listen to your complaints about my telling of your country's history any more.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
-
Petia Petrova wrote:
Not to mention that ANY heretics (no matter of their rules and habits) were blamed of practising and spread of the 'Sodom and Gomora sinful habits'
And yet, France get a reputation for raging heterosexuality in spite of hosting more heretical beliefs than a dozen Bulgarians could shake a. . .stick at. England, of course, gets a reputation for puritanicality in spite of being turned into an entire country of heretics (according to the Pope) and then outsources that reputation to America. Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
Petia Petrova wrote:
You really should finish the job by checking what bogomils did, shouldn't You?...
I tell you what. I'll write my posts to please me, and you write your posts to please you. Amazingly enough, I do not intend to listen to your complaints about my telling of your country's history any more.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
Oakman wrote:
Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
Actually, `absolute truths` don't stand curiosity just as seen above - curioser and LEFT UNCHECKED!? Mhe-he ;) And easy enough to answer - the land named Bulgaria was a neighbour of the Bisantium empire - which nobles continued the graeko-roman traditions of 'noble male friendship'... and later invaded by Turks which are(were) famous for gess what. (With excuses to the actual Turks, who may feel offended - I know that it's due to some specifis traditions and some far away already from the nowadays situation). Meanwhile males here are raging defendors of heterosexuality too - as they ever were - but obviously it's invisible because of being too far from West Europe and because of the 'absolute truth' vision in front, of course.
Oakman wrote:
I do not intend to listen to your complaints about my telling of your country's history any more.
Symptomatic enough - which was the goal to reveal after the 'absolute truth' alert I got. Thank You.
-
Petia Petrova wrote:
Not to mention that ANY heretics (no matter of their rules and habits) were blamed of practising and spread of the 'Sodom and Gomora sinful habits'
And yet, France get a reputation for raging heterosexuality in spite of hosting more heretical beliefs than a dozen Bulgarians could shake a. . .stick at. England, of course, gets a reputation for puritanicality in spite of being turned into an entire country of heretics (according to the Pope) and then outsources that reputation to America. Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
Petia Petrova wrote:
You really should finish the job by checking what bogomils did, shouldn't You?...
I tell you what. I'll write my posts to please me, and you write your posts to please you. Amazingly enough, I do not intend to listen to your complaints about my telling of your country's history any more.
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken
Oakman wrote:
And yet, France get a reputation for raging heterosexuality in spite of hosting more heretical beliefs than a dozen Bulgarians could shake a. . .stick at.
There was no such country “France” in the 10th century, stop manipulating the history. And of course when later they have invented their word for “heretics” they have probably used the name of one of the first heretic sects wildly spread in Europe, and yes – started from Bulgaria. Their name in translation means something like “Loved from God” and they’d wanted more independence from the Church and as a result had been accused in every existing sin. Something like the witches a few centuries later.
Oakman wrote:
England, of course, gets a reputation for puritanicality in spite of being turned into an entire country of heretics (according to the Pope) and then outsources that reputation to America. Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
This has nothing to do with England and how they are using the word nowadays. In Bulgarian the word “inquisition” stands for “tortures” and comes from the Spanish Inquisition. I don’t know any Bulgarian who is crazy enough to say that the Spaniards have invented torturing people and spread this practice in Europe. Anyway this whole thing has nothing to do with the Bogomils or their sexual practices. Probably they were perverted freaks, or probably real saints nobody knows for sure after more than a thousand years. The point is your first post in the thread and dragging Bulgaria into a conversation for some twisted freaks in Afghanistan. Everything after is a pathetic attempt from your side to justify your first haters post. Let me make myself clear – I’m not writing this for you, but for someone who are riding this crappy forum. We both know you don’t give a dead rat’s ass for the truth, the facts or for the Bulgarians.
Oakman wrote:
You Brits tried to free them from the Russians and Ottomans in the Crimean War and discovered their nasty little habits that way.
Do you have even a slightest idea what the Crimean War is?! Or you are not going to bother to check this either?
Oakman wrote:
Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
-
Oakman wrote:
And yet, France get a reputation for raging heterosexuality in spite of hosting more heretical beliefs than a dozen Bulgarians could shake a. . .stick at.
There was no such country “France” in the 10th century, stop manipulating the history. And of course when later they have invented their word for “heretics” they have probably used the name of one of the first heretic sects wildly spread in Europe, and yes – started from Bulgaria. Their name in translation means something like “Loved from God” and they’d wanted more independence from the Church and as a result had been accused in every existing sin. Something like the witches a few centuries later.
Oakman wrote:
England, of course, gets a reputation for puritanicality in spite of being turned into an entire country of heretics (according to the Pope) and then outsources that reputation to America. Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
This has nothing to do with England and how they are using the word nowadays. In Bulgarian the word “inquisition” stands for “tortures” and comes from the Spanish Inquisition. I don’t know any Bulgarian who is crazy enough to say that the Spaniards have invented torturing people and spread this practice in Europe. Anyway this whole thing has nothing to do with the Bogomils or their sexual practices. Probably they were perverted freaks, or probably real saints nobody knows for sure after more than a thousand years. The point is your first post in the thread and dragging Bulgaria into a conversation for some twisted freaks in Afghanistan. Everything after is a pathetic attempt from your side to justify your first haters post. Let me make myself clear – I’m not writing this for you, but for someone who are riding this crappy forum. We both know you don’t give a dead rat’s ass for the truth, the facts or for the Bulgarians.
Oakman wrote:
You Brits tried to free them from the Russians and Ottomans in the Crimean War and discovered their nasty little habits that way.
Do you have even a slightest idea what the Crimean War is?! Or you are not going to bother to check this either?
Oakman wrote:
Only Bulgaria is stuck with a rep for liking it up the butt. Curiouser and curiouser, as Alice said to the rabbit.
Here's a thought: why don't you run off to the lounge and tattle on me?. . .oh wait, you already tried that. How'd it work out for you?
Deyan Georgiev wrote:
There was no such country “France” in the 10th century, stop manipulating the history.
As apparently seems standard with you, you don't worry too much about facts when talking about history: The Franks began invading Gallia aka Gaul, in the 5th century and by the 8th century had conquered most of it, renaming whatever territory they held as "Francia." ("Land of the Franks"). Charles the Bald, grandson of Charlemagne ruled over what was called "Western Francia" which occupies almost the exact same territory as France does today. And that happened in the 9th frackin' century. During the tenth century, his descendants became known as the King of France.
Deyan Georgiev wrote:
What is wrong with you Oakman?
Tell me something. Not too long ago[^], you trashmouthed every VB programmer, and there are lots of them here at CP. If there weren't, Chris couldn't charge as much for the ads that keep this place going. And yet you think it's hilarious to spread out-and-out lies about the competence of all of these people, and make them feel unwelcome. (Though not too much later, you'l whine about not feeling welcome here, yourself.) You go out of your way to do so, introducing your hatred of a language you probably don't understand into a thread that had nothing to do with any programming language and which I imagine a lot of VB programmers had been chuckling as they read until they got to your post. Why did you do that? What's wrong with you? When you were whining in the lounge about my reporting on the etymology of the word, "Bugger," you deliberately slandered me and called me a prick, for citing so many facts and so many sources that you had no chance of arguing against me on any civil level and so resorted to name-calling and an attempt to get me silenced or thrown out. Why did you do that? What is wrong with you? Don't you know how to disagree without becoming an ass?
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imagina
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
What happened in Bulgaria?
What happens in Bulgaria, stays in Bulgaria!