Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Old junk or rare and valuable hardware?

Old junk or rare and valuable hardware?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiongraphicshardwareperformance
85 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Really? If it's about soldering and building, and not about performance, then I would suggest you build an Elf :) The CPU is a bit hard to get, but still in production. Other antiquities, like the RAMs, can easily be replaced by more modern parts. Most of the rest will be simple TTL or (better) CMOS logic. If you like, I can show a user group over at Yahoo for new and ancient Elves. This here is the original Elf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:COSMAC_ELF_CHM.jpg[^] As you can see, not a too huge project. And this is a 'naked' Elf II, essentially the same with hex keyboard and bus slots: http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/accession/X1535.98[^] And finally an Elf II in its case with more IO and RAM: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wcrpaul/335035144/[^]

    "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
    "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

    Mike HankeyM Offline
    Mike HankeyM Offline
    Mike Hankey
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    You know looking back I think that is the unit I wanted to buy but couldn't afford. My ex-wife kept me poor...the more I made the poorer I got.

    CDP1802 wrote:

    Really? If it's about soldering and building, and not about performance, then I would suggest you build an Elf

    I really enjoy the uController I'm working with now and have had a lot of fun wiring all different kinds of peripherals to it. I'm still learning as they are a lot more powerful now but it keeps me busy since I'm semi-retired.

    If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Mike HankeyM Mike Hankey

      It's been 30 yrs and I've been learning AVR assembler lately so that came out instead. :-O

      If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #49

      And I was talking about the instructions on my old computer's CPU. But my Atari later also had a 6502 :)

      "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
      "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rajesh R Subramanian

        CDP1802 wrote:

        And now everything is worth what some fool may think it is. Minus the time and costs to find that fool, I might add

        Hey, be nice. They're customers! Not fools. :)

        "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #50

        Oh no! Not that again. That's exactly what our boss also preached a week ago :) And since then we are paying utmost attention to our customers. By making fun of them.

        "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
        "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Mike HankeyM Mike Hankey

          Yeah I know all 56 even as bad as my memory is I can still remember one. NOP = 0x00 :)

          If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

          J Offline
          J Offline
          JimmyRopes
          wrote on last edited by
          #51

          Mike Hankey wrote:

          NOP = 0x00

          That seems to be a constant in all assemblers I have worked with, I think (DEC-10, DEC-11) but these were in college (40+ years ogo) or early in my professional life (30+ years ago). I am not sure if IBM assembler (BAL) even had a NOP or NOOP. I don't remember it. In some sense what else would it be?

          Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
          Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
          I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

          M L Mike HankeyM 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • J JimmyRopes

            Mike Hankey wrote:

            NOP = 0x00

            That seems to be a constant in all assemblers I have worked with, I think (DEC-10, DEC-11) but these were in college (40+ years ogo) or early in my professional life (30+ years ago). I am not sure if IBM assembler (BAL) even had a NOP or NOOP. I don't remember it. In some sense what else would it be?

            Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
            Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
            I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mladen Jankovic
            wrote on last edited by
            #52

            0xEA... 0x90... to name a few :)

            [Genetic Algorithm Library]

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J JimmyRopes

              Mike Hankey wrote:

              NOP = 0x00

              That seems to be a constant in all assemblers I have worked with, I think (DEC-10, DEC-11) but these were in college (40+ years ogo) or early in my professional life (30+ years ago). I am not sure if IBM assembler (BAL) even had a NOP or NOOP. I don't remember it. In some sense what else would it be?

              Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
              Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
              I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #53

              As I wrote somewhere higher up: 0xC4 in case of my old machine. 0x00 would have been IDL (idle), which would for most purposes stop all execution until the next reset. The CPU would just keep executing IDL over and over again without incrementing the program counter.

              "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
              "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mladen Jankovic

                0xEA... 0x90... to name a few :)

                [Genetic Algorithm Library]

                J Offline
                J Offline
                JimmyRopes
                wrote on last edited by
                #54

                You're right. Now that I think of it Intel x86 uses one of those. I was trying to remember things from 20-30 years ago and as I have stated before I have a hard time remembering what I had for lunch.

                Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  As I wrote somewhere higher up: 0xC4 in case of my old machine. 0x00 would have been IDL (idle), which would for most purposes stop all execution until the next reset. The CPU would just keep executing IDL over and over again without incrementing the program counter.

                  "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
                  "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  JimmyRopes
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #55

                  You're right I just didn't remember things too well from 20-30 years ago.

                  Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                  Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                  I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Mine of course is priceless - to me. I had to let some sweat and blood to get it and kept it working for 32 years. And occasionally I take the old horse for a ride. Programming just one hex keyboard away from the CPU has something of Zen. And I like the old CPU. The CDP1802 was always considered to be 'different' or 'strange'. The truth is that it is one of the earliest processors going in the direction of RISC.

                    "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
                    "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jorgen Andersson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #56

                    CDP1802 wrote:

                    CDP1802 was always considered to be 'different' or 'strange'

                    This might be saying more about yourself than you intended. :)

                    List of common misconceptions

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J JimmyRopes

                      You're right I just didn't remember things too well from 20-30 years ago.

                      Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                      Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                      I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #57

                      Let's say that in a more impressive manner. How about this: You have forgotten more about programming than most young hotshots ever knew. And what's left is more as well :)

                      "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
                      "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

                      J B 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Let's say that in a more impressive manner. How about this: You have forgotten more about programming than most young hotshots ever knew. And what's left is more as well :)

                        "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
                        "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        JimmyRopes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #58

                        You are very gracious. :cool:

                        Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                        Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                        I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J JimmyRopes

                          You are very gracious. :cool:

                          Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                          Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                          I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #59

                          A certain young hotshot called me an arrogant a*** for saying this to him. :) In the last years he picked up a few things and from me went to college. Now he likes to say this himself and the other students think he's an arrogant a**. It must be contagious :)

                          "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
                          "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J JimmyRopes

                            Mike Hankey wrote:

                            NOP = 0x00

                            That seems to be a constant in all assemblers I have worked with, I think (DEC-10, DEC-11) but these were in college (40+ years ogo) or early in my professional life (30+ years ago). I am not sure if IBM assembler (BAL) even had a NOP or NOOP. I don't remember it. In some sense what else would it be?

                            Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                            Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                            I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                            Mike HankeyM Offline
                            Mike HankeyM Offline
                            Mike Hankey
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #60

                            JimmyRopes wrote:

                            That seems to be a constant in all assemblers I have worked with,

                            That's the only reason I remembered it. :)

                            If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Mike HankeyM Mike Hankey

                              JimmyRopes wrote:

                              That seems to be a constant in all assemblers I have worked with,

                              That's the only reason I remembered it. :)

                              If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              JimmyRopes
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #61

                              Mike Hankey wrote:

                              That's the only reason I remembered it.

                              I thought I remembered it also, but a couple folks proved me wrong. See the other responses to my statement. Sometimes my memory fails me especially after over 30 years. Perhaps it is so for the assembler you were working with, but it is not true, as I thought, for all assemblers. :-O

                              Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                              Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                              I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                              Mike HankeyM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J JimmyRopes

                                Mike Hankey wrote:

                                That's the only reason I remembered it.

                                I thought I remembered it also, but a couple folks proved me wrong. See the other responses to my statement. Sometimes my memory fails me especially after over 30 years. Perhaps it is so for the assembler you were working with, but it is not true, as I thought, for all assemblers. :-O

                                Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                Mike HankeyM Offline
                                Mike HankeyM Offline
                                Mike Hankey
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #62

                                I also was proven wrong...hey it's been close to 30 yrs. and with all the brain cells I've managed to exterminate over the years it's a wonder I can remember my name. :)

                                If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

                                J 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Mike HankeyM Mike Hankey

                                  I also was proven wrong...hey it's been close to 30 yrs. and with all the brain cells I've managed to exterminate over the years it's a wonder I can remember my name. :)

                                  If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  JimmyRopes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #63

                                  Oh well so much for memory. I think I remember when I could rely on mine, but not anymore. :-D I do a lot of googleing these days when I code. It is better than trying to remember how to do things.

                                  Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                  Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                  I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                  Mike HankeyM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J JimmyRopes

                                    Oh well so much for memory. I think I remember when I could rely on mine, but not anymore. :-D I do a lot of googleing these days when I code. It is better than trying to remember how to do things.

                                    Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                    Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                    I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                    Mike HankeyM Offline
                                    Mike HankeyM Offline
                                    Mike Hankey
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #64

                                    JimmyRopes wrote:

                                    Oh well so much for memory. I think I remember when I could rely on mine, but not anymore.

                                    I can't remember when I had memory. :)

                                    JimmyRopes wrote:

                                    I do a lot of googleing these days when I code. It is better than trying to remember how to do things.

                                    I do the same thing. Have a library of books but it's easier and faster to google...most of the time.

                                    If you keep doing what you been doing you'll keep getting what you been getting http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] [My Site]

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      I still have my first computer, a Netronics Elf II from 1978. It was a kit and I had to scrape together my allowance to get parts and components. I did what I could, but I never got all the neat expansions and had to content with 4k RAM and great black and white graphics at a resolution of 64 x 32 pixels or 64 x 64 pixels. Now I came across someone who wants to sell his old computer. Unlike mine it has practically everything the manufacturer had to offer, including several 4k and 16k memory expansion boards. The four 4k cards cost about 110$ each back then. I know. At least I have one of them. And the two 16k cards were extremely expensive. I would be crazy enough to buy it, but it's only sold completely and the seller wants at least 6000$ for it. That price probably would be equivalent to what the entire computer cost back in 1978. I suppose, I will pass on that offer, but what is the right price? The technology is more than obsolete. I could easily get a 64k RAM chip for a few dollars. It would need little additional logic and making the circuit board would be the hardest part. From that perspective, the price is laughable. On the other side it's a rare old machine. I would not hope to find 1000 of them in working condition on the entire planet. But are there really enough people around who are interested enough to pay such a price?

                                      "I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011 -----
                                      "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mark_Wallace
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #65

                                      If you pay $6,000 for it, then that becomes its market value. If you offer $50 and he accepts, then that becomes its market value. If you pay $6,000 for it, and later can't find a buyer who is willing to pay more than $50, you've been screwed. Never buy anything according to the "market value" or "book price". How much something is worth to a hypothetical person is irrelevant, it's what real people will pay that counts, and even if one idiot was stoopid enough to pay $6,000 for a similar pile of obsolete hardware (although I dare say that no-one ever did; it's probably an "estimated value") that doesn't mean that all such piles are worth that much. Consider how much the item is worth to you, and don't pay more than that.

                                      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mladen Jankovic

                                        CDP1802 wrote:

                                        Netronics Elf II from 1978

                                        Don't know about that, but if I ever bump into one of these[^], I'll be seiously tempted.

                                        [Genetic Algorithm Library]

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Dave Parker
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #66

                                        Interesting, hadn't heard of that before. Seems weird that they'd produce a C64 successor years after the Amiga already replaced it though?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J JimmyRopes

                                          Mike Hankey wrote:

                                          Back then I could, I knew the instruction set inside and out.

                                          Very impressive! :thumbsup:

                                          Mike Hankey wrote:

                                          One of the work shops was on self modifying code. The group said it couldn't be done until I showed them how.

                                          Some people can never get how to do that even after being shown how. Things like that are what I miss about coding in assembler the most.

                                          Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                          Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                          I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Rob Grainger
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #67

                                          I remember knowing the Z80 instruction set on a similar basis when coding with a ZX81, then Spectrum. That and the Complete Spectrum ROM Disassembly book helped write fairly efficient machine code (I had no assembler!)

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups