Oops
-
Well by posting a link to his article in the Lounge, you may be righting your own wrong. :cool:
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
Yeah, good thing it looks rubbish now. :laugh:
Wout
-
Well by posting a link to his article in the Lounge, you may be righting your own wrong. :cool:
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
Then again, maybe posting it in "Site Bugs and Suggestions" would have been even better... ;)
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Don't tell my folks I'm a computer programmer - They think I'm a piano player in a cat house...
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects - Will Rogers, 1924 -
In my blind anger over a spam article from one of my competitors here on Code Project (here[^]), I nuked it sort of accidentally by pressing the "Rollback" button in the revisions tab. I was expecting it not to work to be honest, but I couldn't resist pressing it, so I did. And presto, now I nuked it... rolled back all the way to the first revision or so which looks rubbish (mission accomplished I guess). So, I'm reporting myself to the police now. Was I supposed to be able to do the rollback thing, or is this a CP bug? Anyways, someone higher up please undo my mess up. ;P
Wout
Better post this in the site suggestions / bugs forum where you can request Chris to undo your undo'ing :) Looks like the revisions are still there (all 21 of them) so shouldn't be to much trouble for him.
-
Better post this in the site suggestions / bugs forum where you can request Chris to undo your undo'ing :) Looks like the revisions are still there (all 21 of them) so shouldn't be to much trouble for him.
Argh, can't flipping copy & paste the message without messing up the url. To heck with it.
Wout
-
What? requesting to undo an undo? .... ..... HamsterException caught: Cyclical reference found.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--either way, you are right." — Henry Ford
That would make it a un-deux or a re-deux?
If you are cross-eyed and have dyslexia, can you read all right? http://www.hq4thmarinescomm.com[^] JaxCoder.com[^]WinHeist - Windows Electronic Inventory SysTem
-
In my blind anger over a spam article from one of my competitors here on Code Project (here[^]), I nuked it sort of accidentally by pressing the "Rollback" button in the revisions tab. I was expecting it not to work to be honest, but I couldn't resist pressing it, so I did. And presto, now I nuked it... rolled back all the way to the first revision or so which looks rubbish (mission accomplished I guess). So, I'm reporting myself to the police now. Was I supposed to be able to do the rollback thing, or is this a CP bug? Anyways, someone higher up please undo my mess up. ;P
Wout
Just out of curiosity as I haven't downloaded the source and looked deeply into the article in question, but why would you claim it to be spam? On the surface that doesn't appear to be the case?
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Just out of curiosity as I haven't downloaded the source and looked deeply into the article in question, but why would you claim it to be spam? On the surface that doesn't appear to be the case?
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
Admittedly I may be a tiny bit biased. There is actual free content, but the value is so little that in practise you would need more features and that's where they'll kindly tell you to please have a look at their commercial product or contact them to discuss the options. They can't make the article hugely useful anyway, because they would cut into their own flesh, so because they sell commercial CAD products they cannot do otherwise but give away a teaser.
Wout
-
In my blind anger over a spam article from one of my competitors here on Code Project (here[^]), I nuked it sort of accidentally by pressing the "Rollback" button in the revisions tab. I was expecting it not to work to be honest, but I couldn't resist pressing it, so I did. And presto, now I nuked it... rolled back all the way to the first revision or so which looks rubbish (mission accomplished I guess). So, I'm reporting myself to the police now. Was I supposed to be able to do the rollback thing, or is this a CP bug? Anyways, someone higher up please undo my mess up. ;P
Wout
I've fixed it. Cheers Smitha Vijayan
Are you an aspiring author? Read how to submit articles to CodeProject: Article Submission Guidelines[^] More questions? Ask an editor here...
-
Just out of curiosity as I haven't downloaded the source and looked deeply into the article in question, but why would you claim it to be spam? On the surface that doesn't appear to be the case?
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
Marcus Kramer wrote:
Just out of curiosity as I haven't downloaded the source and looked deeply into the article in question, but why would you claim it to be spam? On the surface that doesn't appear to be the case?
I was wondering the same. It does not look like spam at all. :~
Regards, Nish
New article available: Resetting a View Model in WPF MVVM applications without code-behind in the view My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Admittedly I may be a tiny bit biased. There is actual free content, but the value is so little that in practise you would need more features and that's where they'll kindly tell you to please have a look at their commercial product or contact them to discuss the options. They can't make the article hugely useful anyway, because they would cut into their own flesh, so because they sell commercial CAD products they cannot do otherwise but give away a teaser.
Wout
wout de zeeuw wrote:
Admittedly I may be a tiny bit biased. There is actual free content, but the value is so little that in practise you would need more features and that's where they'll kindly tell you to please have a look at their commercial product or contact them to discuss the options
Yeah, but that does not excuse what you did. You clearly abused the site by doing this sort of thing. I reckon Chris should raise the bar, because you are a silver author and yet you were able to damage an arbitrary article. Maybe that needs to be raised to Gold and higher members who I hope will behave with a little more maturity.
Regards, Nish
New article available: Resetting a View Model in WPF MVVM applications without code-behind in the view My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
I've fixed it. Cheers Smitha Vijayan
Are you an aspiring author? Read how to submit articles to CodeProject: Article Submission Guidelines[^] More questions? Ask an editor here...
Thanks.
Wout
-
I've fixed it. Cheers Smitha Vijayan
Are you an aspiring author? Read how to submit articles to CodeProject: Article Submission Guidelines[^] More questions? Ask an editor here...
Ah, good ol' Ctrl-Y :thumbsup:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am