Is "binary" a language?
-
firegryphon wrote:
10,000 other people have already written one
Never questioned that, just never crossed any. Specially a web-based, which I don't need to install or anything and it's ASCII decoder. Luckly it was ASCII text encoding, or else it wouldn't be so easy to figure the message out.
No doubt. You are a far more diligent man than I. Go to this website though. http://www.roubaixinteractive.com/PlayGround/Binary\_Conversion/Binary\_To\_Text.asp
ragnaroknrol: Yes, but comparing a rabid wolverine gnawing on your face while stabbing you with a fountain pen to Vista is likely to make the wolverine look good, so it isn't exactly that big of a compliment.
-
No doubt. You are a far more diligent man than I. Go to this website though. http://www.roubaixinteractive.com/PlayGround/Binary\_Conversion/Binary\_To\_Text.asp
ragnaroknrol: Yes, but comparing a rabid wolverine gnawing on your face while stabbing you with a fountain pen to Vista is likely to make the wolverine look good, so it isn't exactly that big of a compliment.
Oh man, where is the creativity these days....
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
I would argue that Binary Code is a formal language. Based on wiki's language disambiguation[^], there is a distinction between human, natural, and artificial languages. A formal language, i.e. an artificial language - a language created for a specific purpose, is a concept used in mathematics and computer science. Thus[^], a formal language L over an alphabet Σ is a subset of Σ*, that is, a set of words over that alphabet. In computer science and mathematics, which do not usually deal with natural languages, the adjective "formal" is often omitted as redundant. While formal language theory usually concerns itself with formal languages that are described by some syntactical rules, the actual definition of the concept "formal language" is only as above: a (possibly infinite) set of finite-length strings, no more nor less. In practice, there are many languages that can be described by rules, such as regular languages or context-free languages. The notion of a formal grammar may be closer to the intuitive concept of a "language," one described by syntactic rules. By an abuse of the definition, a particular formal language is often thought of as being equipped with a formal grammar that describes it. If by binary[^] we understand binary code[^], a way of representing text or computer processor instructions by the use of the binary number system's two-binary digits 0 and 1, then we have a formal language. For another example, Braille is a type of binary code that is widely used by blind people to read and write. This system consist of 6 dot positions, three in each column. Each dot has two states, raised or not raised. Braille is a language, right? : )
I would imagine if you could understand Morse Code, a tap dancer would drive you crazy. -- Mitch Hedberg (American Comedian, 1968-2005)
-
Oh man, where is the creativity these days....
Obviously not with ovaltine as evidenced by the special note.
ragnaroknrol: Yes, but comparing a rabid wolverine gnawing on your face while stabbing you with a fountain pen to Vista is likely to make the wolverine look good, so it isn't exactly that big of a compliment.
-
Obviously not with ovaltine as evidenced by the special note.
ragnaroknrol: Yes, but comparing a rabid wolverine gnawing on your face while stabbing you with a fountain pen to Vista is likely to make the wolverine look good, so it isn't exactly that big of a compliment.
Exactly
-
Binary is a base 2 number system. It is not a language and does not exhibit language charactistics, such as grammar, constructs, declarations, logic etc.
I would argue that Binary Code is a formal language. Based on wiki's language disambiguation[^], there is a distinction between human, natural, and artificial languages. A formal language, i.e. an artificial language - a language created for a specific purpose, is a concept used in mathematics and computer science. Thus[^], a formal language L over an alphabet Σ is a subset of Σ*, that is, a set of words over that alphabet. In computer science and mathematics, which do not usually deal with natural languages, the adjective "formal" is often omitted as redundant. While formal language theory usually concerns itself with formal languages that are described by some syntactical rules, the actual definition of the concept "formal language" is only as above: a (possibly infinite) set of finite-length strings, no more nor less. In practice, there are many languages that can be described by rules, such as regular languages or context-free languages. The notion of a formal grammar may be closer to the intuitive concept of a "language," one described by syntactic rules. By an abuse of the definition, a particular formal language is often thought of as being equipped with a formal grammar that describes it. If by binary[^] we understand binary code[^], a way of representing text or computer processor instructions by the use of the binary number system's two-binary digits 0 and 1, then we have a formal language. For another example, Braille is a type of binary code that is widely used by blind people to read and write. This system consist of 6 dot positions, three in each column. Each dot has two states, raised or not raised. Braille is a language, right? : )
I would imagine if you could understand Morse Code, a tap dancer would drive you crazy. -- Mitch Hedberg (American Comedian, 1968-2005)
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
Upon further thought... Perhaps the argument is really: There exists at least one language which is based on a binary alphabet. vs. There exist exactly zero languages which are based on a binary alphabet.
-
I can't believe I was dumb-nerd enough to write a decoder...
-
Henry Minute wrote:
Definitely a language
Well, I came down in the other camp, not a language. But if you're sure. ;-) Which definition of language are you rolling with there? Personally, I'd say any language needed more than just symbols to constitute meaning. The fact that binary can be used to convey meaning is not sufficient - just as an alphabet is not a language - the langage needs constructional forms that define valid sentences and structure. Even comparing it to an alphabet is dubious - I'd go along with the definition of "a base 2 number system" as being the best I've seen here.
It's definitively a language - otherwise assembly (language) wouldn't be a 'language' ... It's equal if you JNZ xxx or 68 xxx (codes not verified - just an example)
-
No doubt. You are a far more diligent man than I. Go to this website though. http://www.roubaixinteractive.com/PlayGround/Binary\_Conversion/Binary\_To\_Text.asp
ragnaroknrol: Yes, but comparing a rabid wolverine gnawing on your face while stabbing you with a fountain pen to Vista is likely to make the wolverine look good, so it isn't exactly that big of a compliment.
01110100011010000110100101110011001000000110100101110011001000000110000100100000011000110110111101101111011011000010000001110011011010010111010001100101
-
01110100011010000110100101110011001000000110100101110011001000000110000100100000011000110110111101101111011011000010000001110011011010010111010001100101
0100010001101111011011100010011101110100001000000110110101100001011010110110010100100000011011010110010100100000011010000111010101110010011101000010000001111001011011110111010100100000011001100110111101110010001000000111000001101111011100110111010001101001011011100110011100100000011101000110100001101001011100110010111000100000001000000011101100101001
ragnaroknrol: Yes, but comparing a rabid wolverine gnawing on your face while stabbing you with a fountain pen to Vista is likely to make the wolverine look good, so it isn't exactly that big of a compliment.
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
Emrak123 wrote:
Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language".
What say you? Is binary a language?
I say there is a problem with term definition. And the responses to this thread demonstrate that. The first step is to define "binary" and "language".
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
There's only one thing that defines something as a 'language': That the person delivering/receiving it thinks/knows it is being used in order to communicate If you speak English to me, I know you're speaking English, and I can understand and respond, therefore we are using language. If you speak Russian to me, it will sound like gibberish, but I know you're using a language - we can't communicate using words alone, but I know you're using a language. If you sneeze, gargle and spit, I think/know you are not using language and you think/know you are not using a language, therefore it is not a language and various combinations of sneezing, gargling and spitting cannot communicate anything to me. If, however, an alien were to see you sneeze, gargle and spit and thought you were using it as a language in order to communicate, it becomes a language to the alien, even though to you, the deliverer, it is not being used in this way. If you are speaking binary to me, "one zero one zero zero" etc., only if I think/know you are using it in order to communicate will it become a language, otherwise it's interpreted as English gibberish. It gets even hairier because technically you're communicating English through (presumably) ASCII through binary. So, it comes down to an "Einsteinianism" (totally copyrighting that word) - "each observer is entitled to their own opinion, and each is equally correct". Or that thing they tell hideously obese women "beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
Is Morse Code a language? No, its a representation of the alphabet. Is Ascii a language? No, just represents text. Put it together, it can become a language. If binary is a language, we will need to deal with big and little endian.
-
I would argue that Binary Code is a formal language. Based on wiki's language disambiguation[^], there is a distinction between human, natural, and artificial languages. A formal language, i.e. an artificial language - a language created for a specific purpose, is a concept used in mathematics and computer science. Thus[^], a formal language L over an alphabet Σ is a subset of Σ*, that is, a set of words over that alphabet. In computer science and mathematics, which do not usually deal with natural languages, the adjective "formal" is often omitted as redundant. While formal language theory usually concerns itself with formal languages that are described by some syntactical rules, the actual definition of the concept "formal language" is only as above: a (possibly infinite) set of finite-length strings, no more nor less. In practice, there are many languages that can be described by rules, such as regular languages or context-free languages. The notion of a formal grammar may be closer to the intuitive concept of a "language," one described by syntactic rules. By an abuse of the definition, a particular formal language is often thought of as being equipped with a formal grammar that describes it. If by binary[^] we understand binary code[^], a way of representing text or computer processor instructions by the use of the binary number system's two-binary digits 0 and 1, then we have a formal language. For another example, Braille is a type of binary code that is widely used by blind people to read and write. This system consist of 6 dot positions, three in each column. Each dot has two states, raised or not raised. Braille is a language, right? : )
I would imagine if you could understand Morse Code, a tap dancer would drive you crazy. -- Mitch Hedberg (American Comedian, 1968-2005)
You can program in binary, not as easily as assembler, not as easier as C,FORTRAN, etc. Back in the very old days, you did program you computer using binary switches.
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
-
Help us settle a programmatic civil war here at my job... The first camp says "binary is NOT any kind of language". The second camp says "binary IS a kind of language". Neither camp is implying that there are teams of binary programmers out there or anything, there's just a debate on what constitutes a "language". What say you? Is binary a language? Thanks!
-
I can't believe I was dumb-nerd enough to write a decoder...
It's nice to write a decoder, but for this quick task i've 1) merged it to long string 2) divided by groups of 8 bits 3) copy-pasted to excel 4) used to excel functions bin2dec and char, and voila! in 2 minutes. steps 1 and two i did with Textpad macro, but it for such small length it can also be done manually.
-
The binary I posted is actually one of the responses of "Group 2" above. The point being, if the block of binary "says" anything, then by default "Group 1" must admit that it's a programming language. If it does not "say" anything and is just random gibberish, then it's not a language.
Those bits don't say anything by themselves. They make sense iff we assume they're in ASCII. So, in this case, ASCII *IS* a language, and "binary" is its particular alphabet. The same could also be written with decimal or hex, like the English words can be written with "regular" letters or with Braille. Latin letters or braille dots are not language, are they?