Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. 2030 China drops to #2

2030 China drops to #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlannouncement
22 Posts 15 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Albert Holguin

    time for india to adopt this policy?

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rob Graham
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I takes a pretty draconian government to make that work. I don't think India has a prayer.

    "People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them." Eric Hoffer "The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole'" John Scalzi

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Steve Mayfield

      in population[^] :omg:

      Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

      H Offline
      H Offline
      HimanshuJoshi
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      :omg: :wtf:

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Steve Mayfield

        in population[^] :omg:

        Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nemanja Trifunovic
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        No surprises there. China has had a pretty slow population growth for a while (one child policy).

        utf8-cpp

        S D 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • A Albert Holguin

          time for india to adopt this policy?

          S Offline
          S Offline
          SimulationofSai
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          It did, in the last two decades. But there was absolutely no enforcement and the benefits weren't advertised well enough. It's a cultural thing to have many kids and be surrounded by family, but people unfortunately do not look at the bigger picture. :(

          SG Aham Brahmasmi!

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S SimulationofSai

            It did, in the last two decades. But there was absolutely no enforcement and the benefits weren't advertised well enough. It's a cultural thing to have many kids and be surrounded by family, but people unfortunately do not look at the bigger picture. :(

            SG Aham Brahmasmi!

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Albert Holguin
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            not looking at the bigger picture is a problem in most cultures!

            U 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H HimanshuJoshi

              :omg: :wtf:

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nish Nishant
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Not surprising at all!

              Regards, Nish


              Are you addicted to CP? If so, check this out: The Code Project Forum Analyzer : Find out how much of a life you don't have! My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Henry Minute

                O....M....G Only a few more years before the first of that 180 Million types their first faltering "Codezzzzzzz Plzzzzzzzzz". AAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrgggghhhhh!!!

                Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rajesh R Subramanian
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                :cool:

                "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Albert Holguin

                  not looking at the bigger picture is a problem in most cultures!

                  U Offline
                  U Offline
                  urbane tiger
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Most of us can't even find the big picture ;) What will be the effect of gender imbalance I wonder. Put excess males in the army & send them off to war, else they may cause trouble at home.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                    No surprises there. China has had a pretty slow population growth for a while (one child policy).

                    utf8-cpp

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Steve Mayfield
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    What shocked me the most was that India has 1/8th the area of China

                    Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Albert Holguin

                      time for india to adopt this policy?

                      V Offline
                      V Offline
                      Vikram A Punathambekar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Too draconian, won't work in a democracy.

                      Cheers, विक्रम (Have gone past my troika - 4 CCCs!) "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A AspDotNetDev

                        I can't wait to book a ticket to Mars. Until then, perhaps I'll consider Canada.

                        [WikiLeaks Cablegate Cables]

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Same thing?

                        Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                          No surprises there. China has had a pretty slow population growth for a while (one child policy).

                          utf8-cpp

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dan Neely
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          With all the exceptions built into the system they actually have a "one and a half child" policy (1.47 for the nitpickers), before counting people sneaking around and having kids behind the govts back. China's official birthrate is 1.8; but since the official number has been flatlined at that level with zero variation for some years after decades of decline, most people think the real number is somewhat lower. Last year The Economist cited 1.6 as a likely correct value.

                          3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U urbane tiger

                            Most of us can't even find the big picture ;) What will be the effect of gender imbalance I wonder. Put excess males in the army & send them off to war, else they may cause trouble at home.

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Albert Holguin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            yeah, that imbalance is definitely going to be a big problem eventually

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                              Too draconian, won't work in a democracy.

                              Cheers, विक्रम (Have gone past my troika - 4 CCCs!) "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Albert Holguin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              well definitely forcing people to do it wouldn't work in a democracy, but there has to be some way to slow the population... that rate of growth is just ridiculous... maybe incentives for single child families?

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Albert Holguin

                                yeah, that imbalance is definitely going to be a big problem eventually

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Dan Neely
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Yeah. The first round of countries to have this problem (South Korea, Taiwan, etc) were able to mitigate the issue locally by importing brides from poorer regions until their rising affluence began to counter the selection problem. Mainland China and India are both too big to solve it that way, and because testing is much cheaper now than it was a few decades ago have much larger problems proportionally as well.

                                3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Albert Holguin

                                  well definitely forcing people to do it wouldn't work in a democracy, but there has to be some way to slow the population... that rate of growth is just ridiculous... maybe incentives for single child families?

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Dan Neely
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  There is. Rising affluence and urbanization. Huge families with a zillion kids are an asset for subsistence farmers because the kids can begin contributing labor very early in life; for factory/office workers who have to pay for childcare and education instead kids are a financial liability and family sizes shrink after a generation or two. This change is known as the demographic transition[^]. The good news is that the current round of developing countries are undergoing a more rapid transition than most of the current developed countries did.

                                  3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups