dotPeek is out!
-
Beware, it is very buggy, but nice to see other options coming to the playing field.
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best, and since that's the bit I'm most interested in, well oops. The next version of R# holds more interest for me.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
-
Terrible decompilation (and reconstruction) from non-C# assemblies (in my case from IronScheme). I have reported the bug along with the 'culprit' assembly.
-
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best, and since that's the bit I'm most interested in, well oops. The next version of R# holds more interest for me.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best
Speaking of which. The JustDecompile from Telerik that you linked to the other day is a little suss in that respect too. Not in it's reliability but in its attempts at source code.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best
Speaking of which. The JustDecompile from Telerik that you linked to the other day is a little suss in that respect too. Not in it's reliability but in its attempts at source code.
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
Funnily enough, I noticed that later on.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
-
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best, and since that's the bit I'm most interested in, well oops. The next version of R# holds more interest for me.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best
I find it telling how we're all so used to stuff just not working as advertised.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
I haven't got the absolute latest version, but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best, and since that's the bit I'm most interested in, well oops. The next version of R# holds more interest for me.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
There's only one public build available at the moment (published yesterday), so unless you're a JetBrains insider, I'm pretty much sure you have the latest build. What do you mean by "view source code"? Do you mean the decompilation functionality per se, or reconstructing code from PDBs downloaded from a symbol server? Thanks
-
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
but I found the "view source code" worked intermittently at best
I find it telling how we're all so used to stuff just not working as advertised.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
We've tested all features outlined in Introducing JetBrains dotPeek[^]. If any of them are known to be not working reliably enough, there's always a "Known issue" mark there. As an additional line of defense, this is the _very first_ public build, and we're not even calling it a Beta (as opposed to certain vendors). Please let us know what exactly is not working as advertised for you. Thanks
-
There's only one public build available at the moment (published yesterday), so unless you're a JetBrains insider, I'm pretty much sure you have the latest build. What do you mean by "view source code"? Do you mean the decompilation functionality per se, or reconstructing code from PDBs downloaded from a symbol server? Thanks
I mean the decompilation functionality. There have been certain cases where it's just not shown the decompiled source. Closing and restarting seems to fix it.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
-
I mean the decompilation functionality. There have been certain cases where it's just not shown the decompiled source. Closing and restarting seems to fix it.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
I see. We'd appreciate if you report the exact cases (if at all reproducible) to dotPeek issue tracker at http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues/DOTP[^] Thank you
-
I see. We'd appreciate if you report the exact cases (if at all reproducible) to dotPeek issue tracker at http://youtrack.jetbrains.net/issues/DOTP[^] Thank you
OK. Next time it happens I'll try to report exactly what went wrong.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility