As a desktop app developer, would you target Mac OS and Linux?
-
What do your customers use?
Pete
-
With hollow-point ammunition, definitely.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
We target Mac. Linux users have no money, or, at least, prefer not to pay for software
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
We target Mac. Linux users have no money, or, at least, prefer not to pay for software
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
There's a nugget for all you s/w developers right there.
Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
-
Linux for the servers and Windows for the client, it's driven by customer demand. If someone decides to pay for a mac front end, we'll develop it.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
-
If I were creating an app targeting home users, I'd use Silverlight (unless I had a need for something it didn't offer). That would allow it to run on Windows and Macs, I wouldn't worry about Linux in that market.
-
We target Mac. Linux users have no money, or, at least, prefer not to pay for software
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
A quite reasonable approach. Especially if you have to earn a living by this. Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
-
No, but, as a C# developer, I would try to write pure .Net so that my apps would run under Mono with little or no effort.
Doesn't mono use it's own (GTK based??) UI library instead of winforms/wpf?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius
-
Doesn't mono use it's own (GTK based??) UI library instead of winforms/wpf?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius
-
With hollow-point ammunition, definitely.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
If your application is in the multimedia/sound/graphic domain :probably yes. (for example lightroom (photo), traktor (dj), resolume (vj) ) if not : no.
Watched code never compiles.
-
Doesn't mono use it's own (GTK based??) UI library instead of winforms/wpf?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius
There is a bit of a terminology issue here, I think. System.Windows.Forms (and whatever the WPF one is called, as well, I think) has been translated for Mono so that it works with the native operating system window manager. So from a .Net developer perspective, you don't need to do anything different, except allow for different control styles as the UI themes are different.
-
With hollow-point ammunition, definitely.
Software Zen:
delete this;:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That just made my day!
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
-
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That just made my day!
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
All part of the friendly service :-D.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
There is a bit of a terminology issue here, I think. System.Windows.Forms (and whatever the WPF one is called, as well, I think) has been translated for Mono so that it works with the native operating system window manager. So from a .Net developer perspective, you don't need to do anything different, except allow for different control styles as the UI themes are different.
I think I'm just out of date. Gtk#[^] is one of mono's UI libraries, and the history[^] for mono's winform library includes two initial failed attempts, implying it was a relative latecomer to the platform (although specific dates aren't given anywhere I can see).
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius
-
What are those? :confused:
-
I would think a 50 cal. sniper scope would do the job nicely?
I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other.