Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. As we move inexorably towards the 10th anniversary

As we move inexorably towards the 10th anniversary

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
toolsphpcomhelpquestion
45 Posts 14 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Pete OHanlon

    Fair enough. So you're opposed to the organisation of religion as opposed to the individuality of religion then.

    Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

    My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

    G Offline
    G Offline
    GParkings
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    this is pretty much my view. Most religious people i have come across are genuinely likable, likewise the moral code that most religions encourage is commendable. Its the organisations that tend to deviate from their own moral codes and generally care more for seeking power and influence than for the teachings of their creed. Fairly recently in the UK a decision was made in the church of england that several high up bishops didn't like, so they defected to catholicism. Either: 1. The 2 branches of christianty are so similar that there is negligible difference in the teachings, actions, etc. In which case, why have both? 2. There is significant difference in the teachings of the 2 branches that they are both justified in existing. In which case, switching their beliefs because of a political decision within the church of england suggests that their beliefs weren't that strong and, in fact, the driving force of their membership within the religious organization was something else such as power, wealth, politics, etc

    Pedis ex oris

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G GParkings

      this is pretty much my view. Most religious people i have come across are genuinely likable, likewise the moral code that most religions encourage is commendable. Its the organisations that tend to deviate from their own moral codes and generally care more for seeking power and influence than for the teachings of their creed. Fairly recently in the UK a decision was made in the church of england that several high up bishops didn't like, so they defected to catholicism. Either: 1. The 2 branches of christianty are so similar that there is negligible difference in the teachings, actions, etc. In which case, why have both? 2. There is significant difference in the teachings of the 2 branches that they are both justified in existing. In which case, switching their beliefs because of a political decision within the church of england suggests that their beliefs weren't that strong and, in fact, the driving force of their membership within the religious organization was something else such as power, wealth, politics, etc

      Pedis ex oris

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #35

      GParkings wrote:

      1. The 2 branches of christianty are so similar that there is negligible difference in the teachings, actions, etc. In which case, why have both?

      Both are very similar. The deviation was a purely political decision when king and pope had a falling out (this is a simplification of the politics of the time, but for convenience it will do).

      Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

      G 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Pete OHanlon

        I'd like to take this opportunity to remember Gavin MacMahon who was killed in the Twin Towers on 9/11. He was on the 99th floor when the plane hit and had only recently moved to America. He was so excited to be relocated there. It was his big adventure. I'd also like to remember his family, especially his dad Terry who had flown over to help him set up his apartment. Please, at this time, remember not only the people who lost their lives, but all those who were touched by the events of the day. The workers in the immediate vicinity - they will never forget the fear and horror. The emergency services. The families and friends. And please - no votes on this thread. This is a memorial, however feeble, to one of the nicest lads ever to walk the planet. Gav, you daft nowt, you're missed.

        Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

        My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

        C Offline
        C Offline
        charlieg
        wrote on last edited by
        #36

        Now there is a hijacked thread.

        Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Dalek Dave

          Sad as it undoubtedly was, I feel that once this 10th anniversary is done with, the whole thing should be left to fall into the arms of history. The morbid fascination and national hand-wringing is capitalised upon by media outlets, each vying to be more sombre and socially aware than the next. We do not mourn for the millions who died in WW2 in such a way, and I feel that the 10th year since it happened should be sufficient time for a nation to reflect on the matter, then move on. One cannot mourn forever, it is unhealthy. Let the dead rest, let the living move on.

          ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mycroft Holmes
          wrote on last edited by
          #37

          Dalek Dave wrote:

          The morbid fascination and national hand-wringing is capitalised upon by media outlets

          And what happens every year around the time Diana got parked in a pole! I wonder what it would be like to just have the facts reported without the emotional overload.

          Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C charlieg

            Now there is a hijacked thread.

            Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #38

            charlieg wrote:

            Now there is a hijacked thread.

            Well, it was about hijacked aeroplanes, so..... :)

            ============================== Nothing to say.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Pete OHanlon

              GParkings wrote:

              1. The 2 branches of christianty are so similar that there is negligible difference in the teachings, actions, etc. In which case, why have both?

              Both are very similar. The deviation was a purely political decision when king and pope had a falling out (this is a simplification of the politics of the time, but for convenience it will do).

              Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

              My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

              G Offline
              G Offline
              GParkings
              wrote on last edited by
              #39

              im (somewhat) familiar with the events that lead up tot he formation of the english church, what i was getting at is: for the continued existence of 2 sepperate branches to be justified there needs to be significant difference between the two and there are, i believe, a number of differences with regards to things like: - the authority of the pope coming from god - confession - possession of wealth - proliferation of giant wooden thermometers - love of tea thus, if you are a devout bishop in CofE, no political/managerial decision within that organization should magically change your belief with regards to the authority of the pope (for example).If, therefore, bishops defect from CofE over a managerial decision they either did not fully believe what they were preaching in the CofE or will not believe what they are preaching in the catholic church

              Pedis ex oris

              H 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nagy Vilmos

                The Ickles had temporary guilt about bonfire night when I explained it was remembering the killing of a Catholic who wanted to kill the King. But with hotdogs and sparkers, they soon got over any moral objections. :-D


                Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                H Offline
                H Offline
                hairy_hats
                wrote on last edited by
                #40

                Many people can be made to abandon moral objections if distracted with something shiny.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G GParkings

                  im (somewhat) familiar with the events that lead up tot he formation of the english church, what i was getting at is: for the continued existence of 2 sepperate branches to be justified there needs to be significant difference between the two and there are, i believe, a number of differences with regards to things like: - the authority of the pope coming from god - confession - possession of wealth - proliferation of giant wooden thermometers - love of tea thus, if you are a devout bishop in CofE, no political/managerial decision within that organization should magically change your belief with regards to the authority of the pope (for example).If, therefore, bishops defect from CofE over a managerial decision they either did not fully believe what they were preaching in the CofE or will not believe what they are preaching in the catholic church

                  Pedis ex oris

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hairy_hats
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #41

                  The CofE and Catholicism are political power structures. Religion is often an inconvenience to their struggles to cling onto what power and influence they have.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Dalek Dave wrote:

                    WTF is poppy day?

                    What? You, UK citizen, and ex army, and you dont know what poppy day is? Lets see what google says:http://www.google.co.uk/#sclient=psy&hl=en&site=&source=hp&q=%22poppy+day%22&pbx=1&oq=%22poppy+day%22&aq=f&aqi=g5&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1700l3510l0l3697l11l9l0l0l0l0l546l2043l0.1.1.3.0.1l6l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=b52565719a354932&biw=1272&bih=631[^] Oh look, there it is, as broad as daylight. Trying to hide your fallacy with feined ignorance? Tut tu, won't work here Dave. :) Oh, and yes, probably 10 years after WW1 widows were crying, and names were read out. I am sure in 100 years sept 11th will be a small ceremony. Give it time Dave, give it time. The wound is stil raw, the flesh not yet closed over.

                    ============================== Nothing to say.

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    wizardzz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #42

                    I actually have to agree with you here. I think Dave is upset at how much attention the US is getting on the tellie, or wishes he could meet Rachel Uchitel. I haven't watched tv in days, so maybe I'd be annoyed with how early it started. However, 10 years after a violent history changing event is not very long.

                    "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson My comedy.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Pete OHanlon

                      I'd like to take this opportunity to remember Gavin MacMahon who was killed in the Twin Towers on 9/11. He was on the 99th floor when the plane hit and had only recently moved to America. He was so excited to be relocated there. It was his big adventure. I'd also like to remember his family, especially his dad Terry who had flown over to help him set up his apartment. Please, at this time, remember not only the people who lost their lives, but all those who were touched by the events of the day. The workers in the immediate vicinity - they will never forget the fear and horror. The emergency services. The families and friends. And please - no votes on this thread. This is a memorial, however feeble, to one of the nicest lads ever to walk the planet. Gav, you daft nowt, you're missed.

                      Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      Geordie_Wilber
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #43

                      Pete, I already knew that we'd walked many of the same streets from some of your previous posts, but dammit man I've got tears rolling down me bloody face now coz I've been thinking about the same daft get even more these last few days an' all. I've still got his AON business card on me desk, the last email he sent us in me inbox and I still know his mam's phone number from 30 years ago off by heart... I miss him man. Thanks for taking the time to let the other CPians know about him and for the chance to salute him too.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        BobJanova wrote:

                        (I don't believe for a moment they knew the towers would collapse like that).

                        No one thought they would collapse so readilly. I was shocked (ex structural engineer in steel buildings). Lots of planes have hit lots of buildings, never has one come aprt so easilly. When I read an inquest into the design I was not surprised though, it was shoddillly built.

                        ============================== Nothing to say.

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BobJanova
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #44

                        No, exactly :)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Geordie_Wilber

                          Pete, I already knew that we'd walked many of the same streets from some of your previous posts, but dammit man I've got tears rolling down me bloody face now coz I've been thinking about the same daft get even more these last few days an' all. I've still got his AON business card on me desk, the last email he sent us in me inbox and I still know his mam's phone number from 30 years ago off by heart... I miss him man. Thanks for taking the time to let the other CPians know about him and for the chance to salute him too.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          Pete OHanlon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #45

                          Damn man, but it's good to know that he's living on with us. Here's to you Gav, and here's to you bonnie lad. Let's hoist a pint in his memory.

                          Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

                          My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups